14 research outputs found

    Editorial

    No full text

    Supply chain management and firm performance: An analysis of the literature

    No full text
    The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a systematic literature review carried out for the period (1996-2015) for the theme of ‘supply chain management and firm performance’. A systematic literature review process was conducted by which two databases were consulted and after filtering the data, 183 papers were selected for analysis. The findings point out that the research is conservative in its selection of theories, methodologies and topics, with the RBV, survey questionnaire and ‘SC integration and its impact on financial and operational performance’ being a typical research title. Future research avenues are identified as counteracting this trend, i.e. by the use of more novel theories, methods and topics, which could illuminate future research directions

    Simulation analysis of the sustainability performance of a supply chain subject to disruption

    Get PDF
    In recent years, two main concerns have surfaced in relation to improving manufacturing supply chains; one is their sustainability and the other is their resilience to major disruptions. This first concern relates to the optimal use of ever-scarcer natural resources. Hence, supply chains need to be assessed and re-designed to accommodate this trend and take in to account the triple bottom line of environmental, economic and social measures. The second concern stems from the globalisation of supply chains which increases complexity and vulnerability to major disruptions. To survive, organisations within supply chains must be resilient in the face of such disruptions. This paper’s study addresses these two concerns, i.e. sustainability and resilience, by using computer simulations to explore the effects of disruptions on the sustainability performance of a supply chain

    Mapping the Operations and Supply Chain Management field: a journal governance perspective

    Get PDF
    Purpose The paper addresses the research questions: how do the interlocking editorial advisory boards (EABs) of operations and supply chain (OSCM) journals map out the field’s diverse academic communities and how demographically diverse is the field and its communities? Design/methodology/approach The study applies Social Network Analysis to web-based editorial advisory board data for 38 journals listed under Operations Management in the 2010 ABS academic journal quality guide. Findings Members of editorial advisory boards of the 38 journals are divided in to seven distinct communities which are mapped to the field’s knowledge structures and further aggregated in to a core and periphery of the network. A burgeoning community of supply chain management (SCM) academics forms the core along with those with more traditional interests. Male academics affiliated to USA institutions and to business schools predominate in the sample. Research limitations/implications A new strand of research is opened up connecting journal governance networks to knowledge structures in the OSCM field. OM is studied separately from its reference and associated disciplines. The use of the ABS list might attract comments that the study has an implicit European perspective - however we do not believe this to be the case. Practical implications The study addresses the implications of the lack of diversity for the practice of OM as an academic discipline. Originality/value As the first study of its kind, i.e. SNA of editorial advisory board members of OSCM journals, this study marks out a new perspective and acts as a benchmark for the future
    corecore