Risk of Death and Recurrent Ventricular Arrhythmias in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest Concurrent With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Patients with concurrent CA and AMI were found to be at high risk of recurrent VA, with VA-free survival rates significantly worse than those of patients with AMI but no CA, and comparable to those with CA only. Accordingly, these patients should be considered for ICD implantation

Predictors of Mortality Amongst Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Secondary Prevention of Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND: Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) reduce mortality in survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). We investigated the predictors of mortality after ICD implantation in survivors of CA. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical records and social security death index of all patients who received an ICD in a preexisting database of survivors of CA at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center was performed. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model were performed with backward elimination to identify independent predictors of the time to death, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. RESULTS: Eighty patients (64 men) with a mean age of 64.4+/-12.5 years were followed for 4.7+/-2.3 years after ICD implantation. Survival rates were 93.8%, 65% and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Independent predictors of time to death were determined to include age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.91 per 10-year increase, p = 0.003), serum creatinine > or = 1.3 mg/dL (HR = 2.56, p = 0.004), and QRS width >120 ms (HR = 5.14, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of ICD recipients secondary to CA, older age, elevated serum creatinine, and wider QRS duration were independent predictors of mortality. The presence of more than one risk factor in the same patient was associated with higher mortality rates. Whether interventions such as biventricular pacing can offset this increase risk of death warrants further investigation

Microvolt T-wave alternans as a predictor of mortality and severe arrhythmias in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies have demonstrated that the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is effective for the primary prevention of arrhythmic events but due to imposing costs, there remains a need to identify which patients will derive the greatest benefit. Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) has been proposed to assist in this stratification.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We systematically searched the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, the Cochrane Library, INAHTA, and the Web of Science to identify all primary prevention randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies with at least 12 months of follow-up examining MTWA as a predictor of mortality and severe arrhythmic events in patients with severe left-ventricular dysfunction. The search was limited to full-text English publications between January 1990 and May 2007. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and severe arrhythmias. Data were synthesized using Bayesian hierarchical models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified no trials and 8 published cohort studies involving a total of 1,946 patients, including 332 positive, 656 negative, 84 indeterminate, and 874 non-negative (which includes both positive and indeterminate tests) MTWA test results. The risk of mortality or severe arrhythmic events was higher in patients with a positive MTWA compared to a negative test (RR = 2.7, 95% credible interval (CrI) = 1.4, 6.1). Similar results were obtained when comparing non-negative MTWA to a negative test.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A positive MTWA test predicts mortality or severe arrhythmic events in a population of individuals with severe left ventricular dysfunction. However, the wide credible interval suggests the clinical utility of this test remains incompletely defined, ranging from very modest to substantial. Additional high quality studies are required to better refine the role of MTWA in the decision making process for ICD implantation.</p