Life After Critical Illness: Neurocognitive Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life of Children After PICU Admission, and the Role of Late Parenteral Nutrition

The results of the PEPaNIC (pediatric early versus late parenteral nutrition in the pediatric intensive care unit) follow-up study are described in this dissertation. Neurocognitive functioning of children who participated in the PEPaNIC randomized controlled trial was assessed two and four years after admission to the intensive care. Health-related quality of life of children and parents was assessed six months and two years after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. In addition to the comparison between patients who received early versus late parenteral nutrition, the group of critically ill children was compared with a group of healthy control children

Health-related quality of life of children and their parents 2 years after critical illness

Background: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) survivors are at risk for prolonged morbidities interfering with daily life. The current study examined parent-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in former critically ill children and parents themselves and aimed to determine whether withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) in the first week of critical illness affected children’s and parents’ HRQoL 2 years later. Methods: Children who participated in the pediatric early versus late parenteral nutrition in critical illness (PEPaNIC) trial and who were testable 2 years later (n = 1158) were included. Their HRQoL outcomes were compared with 405 matched healthy controls. At PICU admission, childre

Role of age of critically ill children at time of exposure to early or late parenteral nutrition in determining the impact hereof on long-term neurocognitive development: A secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC-RCT

Background & aims: Early use of parenteral nutrition (early-PN), as compared with withholding it for one week (late-PN), in the PICU, has shown to slow down recovery from critical illness and impair long-term development of 6 neurocognitive/behavioural/emotional functions assessed 2 years later. Given that key steps in brain maturation occur at different times during childhood, we hypothesised that age at time of exposure determines long-term developmental impact of early-PN. Methods: The 786 children who were neurocognitively tested 2 years after participation in the PEPaNIC-RCT were included in this study. First, for each studied long-term outcome, interaction between randomisation to early-PN versus late-PN and age was assessed with multivariable linear regression analysis. Subsequently, for outcomes with an interaction p ≤ 0.15, the impact of early-PN versus late-PN was analysed, after adjustment for risk factors, for 4 subgroups defined based on developmentally-relevant age at time of exposure [≤28 days (n = 121), 29 days to 11 months (n = 239), 11 months to <5 years (n = 223) and ≥5 years (n = 203)]. Results: Interaction between randomisation and age was present for weight, and parent-reported inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, planning/organisation, metacognition, total executive functioning, and internalising and total behavioural/emotional problems. Subgroup analyses revealed that none of the age-groups revealed benefit, whereas children aged 29 days to <11 months were most vulnerable to harm by early-PN for development of inhibitory control (p = 0.008), working memory (p = 0.009), planning/organisation (p = 0.004), metacognition (p = 0.008), and total executive functioning (p = 0.004), and for internalising (p = 0.005) and total behavioural/emotional problems (p = 0.01). Children aged 11 months to <5 years revealed harm by early-PN for development of inhibitory control (p = 0.003). In contrast, children aged ≥5 years and neonates aged ≤28 days appeared less vulnerable. Conclusions: Critically ill children aged 29 days to 11 months at time of exposure were identified as most vulnerable to developmental harm evoked by early-PN. Clinical trials.gov: NCT01536275