The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric

Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal condition characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, with a consequent increase in susceptibility to fracture. Hence, osteoporosis would be best diagnosed by in vivo measurements of bone strength. As this is not clinically feasible, our goal is to estimate bone strength through the assessment of elastic properties, which are highly correlated to strength. Previously established relations between morphological parameters (volume fraction and fabric) and elastic constants could be applied to estimate cancellous bone stiffness in vivo. However, these relations were determined for normal cancellous bone. Cancellous bone from osteoporotic patients may require different relations. In this study we set out to answer two questions. First, can the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone be estimated from morphological parameters? Second, do the relations between morphological parameters and elastic constants, determined for normal bone, apply to osteoporotic bone as well? To answer these questions we used cancellous bone cubes from femoral heads of patients with (n=26) and without (n=32) hip fractures. The elastic properties of the cubes were determined using micro-finite element analysis, assuming equal tissue moduli for all specimens. The morphological parameters were determined using microcomputed tomography. Our results showed that, for equal tissue properties, the elastic properties of cancellous bone from fracture patients could indeed be estimated from morphological parameters. The morphology-based relations used to estimate the elastic properties of cancellous bone are not different for women with or without fractures

Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution

STUDY DESIGN: A finite-element study to investigate the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture and the distribution of load between trabecular core and cortical shell, for healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae. OBJECTIVES: To determine differences between healthy, osteopenic, and osteoporotic vertebrae with regard to the risk of fracture and the load distribution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The literature contains no reports on the effects of osteopenia and osteoporosis on load distribution in vertebral bodies, nor any reports on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture. METHODS: Computed tomography data of vertebral bodies were used to construct patient-specific finite-element models. These models were then used in finite-element analyses to determine the physiologic stresses and strains in the vertebrae. RESULTS: For all three classes of vertebrae the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load transfer decreased from about 70% near the endplates to about 50% in the midtransverse region. The amount of trabecular bone that is at risk of fracture was about 1% for healthy vertebrae, about 3% for osteopenic vertebrae, and about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: Our finite-element models indicated that neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis had any effect on the contribution of the trabecular core to the total load placed on the vertebra. The trabecular core carried about half the load. Our finite-element models indicated that osteoporosis had a significant effect on the amount of trabecular bone at risk of fracture, which increased from about 1% in healthy vertebrae to about 16% for osteoporotic vertebrae

Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level

Osteoporosis is currently defined in terms of low bone mass. However, the source of fragility leading to fracture has not been adequately described. In particular, the contributions of bone tissue properties and architecture to the risk or incidence of fracture are poorly understood. In an earlier experimental study, it was found that the architectural anisotropy of cancellous bone from the femoral heads of fracture patients was significantly increased compared with age- and density-matched control material (Ciarelli et al., J Bone Miner Res 15:32-40; 2000). Using a combination of compression testing and micro-finite element analysis on a subset of cancellous bone specimens from that study, we calculated the hard tissue mechanical properties and the apparent (macroscopic) mechanical properties. The tissue modulus was 10.0 GPa (SD 2.2) for the control group and 10.8 GPa (SD 3.3) for the fracture group (not significant). There were no differences in either the apparent yield strains, percentages of highly strained tissue, or the relationship between apparent yield stress and apparent elastic modulus. Hence, a difference in the tissue yield properties is unlikely. At the apparent level, the fracture group had a significantly decreased transverse stiffness, resulting in increased mechanical anisotropy. These changes suggest that bone in the fracture group was overadapted to the primary load axis, at the cost of fragility in the transverse direction. We conclude that individuals with a history of osteoporotic fractures do not have weaker bone tissue. Architectural and mechanical anisotropy alone renders their bone weaker in the nonprimary loading direction

The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent error loads

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures typically have a gradual onset, frequently remain clinically undetected, and do not seem to be related to traumatic events. The osteoporotic vertebrae may therefore be expected to display a less optimal bone architecture, leading to an uneven load distribution over the bone material. We evaluated the trabecular load distribution in an osteoporotic and a healthy vertebra under normal daily loading by combining three recent innovations: high resolution computed tomography (microCT) of entire bones, microfinite element analyses (microFEA), and parallel supercomputers. Much to our surprise, the number of highly loaded trabeculae was not higher in the osteoporotic vertebra than in the healthy one under normal daily loads (8% and 9%, respectively). The osteoporotic trabeculae were more oriented in the longitudinal direction, compensating for effects of bone loss and ensuring adequate stiffness for normal daily loading. The increased orientation did, however, make the osteoporotic structure less resistant against collateral error loads. In this case, the number of overloaded trabeculae in the osteoporotic vertebra was higher than in the healthy one (13% and 4%, respectively). These results strengthen the paradigm of a strong relationship between bone morphology and external loads applied during normal daily life. They also indicate that vertebral fractures result from actions like forward flexion or lifting, loads that may not be daily but are normally not traumatic either. If future clinical imaging techniques would enable such high-resolution images to be obtained in vivo, the combination of microCT and microFEA would produce a powerful tool to diagnose osteoporosis