3 research outputs found

    Sensitivity of western Canadian <i>Pyrenophora teres</i> f. <i>teres</i> and <i>P. teres</i> f. <i>maculata</i> isolates to propiconazole and pyraclostrobin

    No full text
    <p><i>Pyrenophora teres</i> f. <i>teres</i> (<i>Ptt</i>) and <i>Pyrenophora teres</i> f. <i>maculata</i> (<i>Ptm</i>), the causal agents of the net and spot forms of net blotch of barley, respectively, can be managed in western Canada with fungicides containing propiconazole and pyraclostrobin. Given the potential for development of fungicide resistance, the sensitivity of a collection of <i>Ptt</i> and <i>Ptm</i> isolates to propiconazole and pyraclostrobin was evaluated using microtitre plate bioassays. The concentration of propiconazole needed to inhibit fungal growth by 50% (EC<sub>50</sub>) was 1.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ptt</i> and 2.3 mg L<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ptm</i>, while the EC<sub>50</sub> of pyraclostrobin was 0.015 mg L<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ptt</i> and 0.024 mg L<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ptm</i>. Subsequently, 39 <i>Ptt</i> and 27 <i>Ptm</i> isolates were screened with discriminatory doses of 5 mg propiconazole L<sup>−1</sup> and 0.15 mg pyraclostrobin L<sup>−1</sup>. Inhibition of growth as a result of propiconazole was 12–95% for <i>Ptt</i> and 48–92% for <i>Ptm</i>; growth inhibition as a result of pyraclostrobin was 40–100% and 24–100%, respectively. Two <i>Ptt</i> isolates were insensitive to propiconazole, while one <i>Ptm</i> isolate was insensitive to pyraclostrobin. The latter also showed decreased sensitivity to propiconazole. The identification of net blotch isolates insensitive to these fungicides emphasizes the need for farmers to employ integrated crop management strategies to avoid fungicide resistance build-up.</p

    Race characterization of <i>Pyrenophora tritici-repentis</i> and sensitivity to propiconazole and pyraclostrobin fungicides

    No full text
    <p>Tan spot, caused by <i>Pyrenophora tritici-repentis</i> (<i>Ptr</i>), is one of the most destructive leaf spot diseases of wheat in Canada. Several races of the fungus are known to occur. Wheat growers have adopted fungicides to manage tan spot; however, intensive spraying may lead to development of reduced sensitivity to fungicides in the pathogen. In this study, 62 <i>Ptr</i> isolates were collected from across Saskatchewan and Alberta and characterized to race on a wheat differential set, with confirmation of race designations by polymerase chain reaction. This same set of isolates, and 27 isolates from an earlier study, were also evaluated for sensitivity to propiconazole and pyraclostrobin fungicides by determining the effective concentration of each needed to inhibit radial growth and conidiospore germination by 50%. Races 1 and 2 were predominant in western Canada, with 57% of isolates classified as race 1 and 40% as race 2. In Alberta, race 1 was most common (76%), while in Saskatchewan, it was race 2 (57%). Two of 26 isolates were classified as race 3, which was detected only in Saskatchewan in 2013. There was no evidence of reduced sensitivity of either fungicide in the <i>Ptr</i> isolates examined. This study provides a baseline for <i>Ptr</i> sensitivity to propiconazole and pyraclostrobin to which future collections of the pathogen may be compared.</p

    Virulence of <i>Pyrenophora teres</i> populations in western Canada

    No full text
    <p>Net blotch, caused by <i>Pyrenophora teres</i>, is an economically important disease of barley. The pathogen has two morphologically similar but genetically distinct forms: <i>P. teres</i> f. <i>teres</i> (<i>Ptt</i>) and <i>P. teres</i> f. <i>maculata</i> (<i>Ptm</i>), which cause net form net blotch (NFNB) and spot form net blotch (SFNB), respectively. The virulence of a collection of 39 <i>Ptt</i> and 27 <i>Ptm</i> isolates collected from western Canada was evaluated by inoculating these isolates onto sets of barley differential hosts. One week following inoculation, the second and third leaves of each plant were rated for disease severity on scales of 1–10 (for <i>Ptt</i>) or 1–9 (for <i>Ptm</i>). Plants rated <5 and ≥5 were scored as resistant and susceptible to <i>Ptt</i>, respectively, while plants rated 1–3 and >3 were scored as resistant and susceptible to <i>Ptm</i>. The experiment was repeated. Cluster analysis revealed 16 and 13 distinct pathotype groups, respectively, among the 39 and 27 representative <i>Ptt</i> and <i>Ptm</i> isolates. The barley differentials CI 5791 and CI 9820 were resistant to all isolates of <i>Ptt</i> except one, whilst the differential CI 9214 was resistant to all isolates of <i>Ptm</i> except two. Therefore, the differential lines CI 5791 and CI 9820, for <i>Ptt</i>, and CI 9214, for <i>Ptm</i>, can still be considered as potentially useful sources of resistance for Canadian barley breeding programmes.</p
    corecore