1,068 research outputs found

    Om historiske og nutidige begreber brugt til at beskrive Lili Elvenes

    Get PDF

    Antidepressant utilization after hospitalization with depression:a comparison between non-Western immigrants and Danish-born residents

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Antidepressant (AD) therapy is recommended for patients 4–12 months after remission from depression. The aim was to examine whether immigrants (refugees or family reunited immigrants) from non-Western countries are at greater risk than Danish-born residents of 1) not initiating AD therapy after discharge and 2) early AD discontinuation. METHODS: A cohort of immigrants from non-Western countries (n = 132) and matched Danish-born residents (n = 396) discharged after first admission with moderate to severe depression between 1 January 1996 and 31 May 2008 was followed in the Danish registries. Logistic regression models were applied to explore AD initiation within 30 days after discharge, estimating odds ratio (OR) for immigrants versus Danish-born residents. Early discontinuation was explored by logistic regression, estimating OR for no AD dispensing within 180 days after the first dispensing, and by Cox regression, estimating hazard ratio (HR) for discontinuation (maximum drug supply gap) within 180 days. RESULTS: Immigrants had higher odds for not initiating AD treatment after discharge than Danish-born residents (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.38). When income was included in the model, the strength of the association was attenuated. Odds for early discontinuation was non-significantly higher among immigrants than Danish-born residents (OR = 1.80; 0.87-3.73). Immigrants also had a non-significantly higher hazard of early discontinuation (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.87-2.45). Including income had only minor impact on these associations. CONCLUSION: Immigrants seem less likely to receive the recommended AD treatment after hospitalization with depression. This may indicate a need for a better understanding of the circumstances of this vulnerable group

    Generation of mesenchymal stem cells from induced pluripotent stem cells for regenerative medicine

    Get PDF
    Adult stem cells represent self-renewing, multipotent cells that are capable of producing mature cells of another tissue through differentiation. Stem cells can be sourced from a variety of tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, and cord blood. Bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) have the ability to differentiate, lack of ethical concerns, no teratoma potential, easily cultured and expanded ex vivo, and are immunomodulatory via paracrine effects. Thus, BM-MSCs have been actively used as a therapeutic agent in a variety of clinical trials to treat diverse diseases including neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hepatic diseases, lung injury, renal failure, cancers, wound healing and infections. However, concerns have been raised related to high cell population heterogeneity, poorly understood homing capabilities, and a tendency to lose biological functions in vitro with each passage. Recently, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have emerged as a new class of stem cells with greater versatility. iPSC technology allows for potential treatment of any degenerative diseases or injury due to the pluripotent potentials and unlimited manufacturing. In this study, we established a method to generate iPSC-derived MSCs (iMSCs). The International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) have imposed several criteria for MSCs, which include 1) plastic adherence, 2) stable expression of CD90, CD105, and CD73 cell surface markers, and 3) ability to differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. Our results demonstrated that iMSCs have similar property to that of BM-MSCs by satisfying the criteria. Future directions include creating clinical grade iMSCs which can be used for future regenerative therapies

    Multimorbidity and mortality thereof, among non-western refugees and family reunification immigrants in Denmark:A register based cohort study

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background The prevalence of multimorbidity, defined by having two or more chronic diseases, is increasing in many Western countries. Simultaneously, the migrant population in Western countries has increased, making up a growing proportion of European populations. This study aims i) to determine the quantity and quality of multimorbidity patterns among refugees and family reunification immigrants from non-Western countries compared to Danish-born, and ii) to compare the mortality burden among those with multimorbidity in the two groups. Methods Through the Danish Immigration Service, we conducted a historically prospective cohort study. We identified a total of 101,894 adult migrants who were sub-categorised into refugees and family reunification immigrants, and matched them to a Danish-born comparison group 1:6 on age and sex. Through the Danish National Patient Registry, we obtained information on all in- and outpatient data on hospitalised and ambulatory patients. To assess multimorbidity we used Charlson Comorbidity Index based on ICD-10 codes, together with ICD-10 diagnostic categories for psychiatric disease. We used Cox regression analysis to calculate risk of multimorbidity and risk of mortality in people with multimorbidity. Results Overall refugees had higher risk of multimorbidity compared to Danish-born, while family reunification immigrants had a lower risk. When adjusting for civil status and mean income, the risk was lower for all migrant groups compared to Danish-born. Risk of mortality in people with multimorbidity, was lower for all migrant groups, compared to Danish-born. Conclusion Refugees are an at-risk group for multimorbidity, however, mortality among those with multimorbidity is lower in all migrant groups compared to Danish-born

    The effect of a combined gluten-and casein-free diet on children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders:A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    There has been a growing interest in the gastrointestinal system and its significance for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including the significance of adopting a gluten-free and casein-free (GFCF) diet. The objective was to investigate beneficial and safety of a GFCF diet among children with a diagnosis of ASD. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020 for existing systematic reviews and individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were included if they investigated a GFCF diet compared to a regular diet in children aged 3 to 17 years diagnosed with ASD, with or without comorbidities. The quality of the identified existing reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and overall quality of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). We identified six relevant RCTs, which included 143 participants. The results from a random effect model showed no effect of a GFCF diet on clinician-reported autism core symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.31 (95% Cl. −0.89, 0.27)), parent-reported functional level (mean difference (MD) 0.61 (95% Cl −5.92, 7.14)) or behavioral difficulties (MD 0.80 (95% Cl −6.56, 10.16)). On the contrary, a GFCF diet might trigger gastrointestinal adverse effects (relative risk (RR) 2.33 (95% Cl 0.69, 7.90)). The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low due to serious risk of bias, serious risk of inconsistency, and serious risk of imprecision. Clinical implications of the present findings may be careful consideration of introducing a GFCF diet to children with ASD. However, the limitations of the current literature hinder the possibility of drawing any solid conclusion, and more high-quality RCTs are needed. The protocol is registered at the Danish Health Authority website
    • …
    corecore