Interview

Jeanne Delbaere interviewed Jack Hodgins in Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, on 7 September 1987

Interview and Extract from Innocent Cities

Interview and Extract from Innocent Citie

Do Geometric Models Affect Judgments of Human Motion?

Human figures have been animated using a wide variety of geometric models including stick figures, polygonal models, and NURBS-based models with muscles, flexible skin, or clothing. This paper reports on experiments designed to ascertain whether a viewer's perception of motion characteristics is affected by the geometric model used for rendering. Subjects were shown a series of paired motion sequences and asked if the two motions in each pair were "the same" or "different." The two motion sequences in each pair used the same geometric model. For each trial, the pairs of motion sequences were grouped into two sets where one set was rendered with a stick figure model and the other set was rendered with a polygonal model. Sensitivity measures for each trial indicate that for these sequences subjects were better able to discriminate motion variations with the polygonal model than with the stick figure model

Two Methods for Display of High Contrast Images

High contrast images are common in night scenes and other scenes that include dark shadows and bright light sources. These scenes are difficult to display because their contrasts greatly exceed the range of most display devices for images. As a result, the image contrasts are compressed or truncated, obscuring subtle textures and details. Humans view and understand high contrast scenes easily, "adapting" their visual response to avoid compression or truncation with no apparent loss of detail. By imitating some of these visual adaptation processes, we developed two methods for the improved display of high contrast images. The first builds a display image from several layers of lighting and surface properties. Only the lighting layers are compressed, drastically reducing contrast while preserving much of the image detail. This method is practical only for synthetic images where the layers can be retained from the rendering process. The second method interactively adjusts the displayed image to preserve local contrasts in a small "foveal" neighborhood. Unlike the first method, this technique is usable on any image and includes a new tone reproduction operator. Both methods use a sigmoid function for contrast compression. This function has no e ect when applied to small signals but compresses large signals to fit within an asymptotic limit. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches by comparing processe