44 research outputs found

    Giant Hepatic Hemangioma With Kasabach–Merritt Syndrome: Is the Appropriate Treatment Enucleation or Liver Transplantation?

    Get PDF
    We present a case of giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (Kasabach–Merritt syndrome) which was cured by enucleation. The 51 year old woman presented with increased abdominal girth and easy bruisability. Workup elsewhere revealed a massive hepatic hemangioma and she was started on radiation therapy to the lesion and offered an orthotopic liver transplant. After careful preoperative preparation, we felt that resection was possible and she underwent a successful enucleation. The operation and postoperative course were complicated by bleeding but she recovered and remains well in followup after 6 months. All coagulation parameters have returned to normal. Enucleation should be considered the treatment of choice for hepatic hemangiomas, including those presenting with Kasabach–Merritt syndrome. The benefits of enucleation as compared to liver transplantation for these lesions are discussed

    Primary presacral neuroendocrine tumor associated with imperforate anus

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Presacral masses are unusual growths that have a limited differential diagnosis, typically not including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Classically, NETs are well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic tumors of probable benign behavior. These tumors are associated with a typical morphologic pattern and involve the distal colon, rectum, and genitourinary tract; they are considered less aggressive, frequently asymptomatic, and rarely cause carcinoid syndrome, even when metastatic. Neuroendocrine tumors of the presacral region are extremely rare and few have been described in the literature. They have not been previously reported as being associated with imperforate anus.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We present an interesting case of a woman with a history of imperforate anus that was found to have a primary neuroendocrine tumor of the presacral region with no rectal wall involvement.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We argue that this is a primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor which likely originated from cells of hindgut origin that underwent an abnormal migration during embryonic development.</p

    Predictors of Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Pathologic Major Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy and Surgery: The Impact of Chemotherapy Protocols

    Get PDF
    Tumor recurrence is an important problem threatening esophageal cancer patients after surgery, even when they achieve a pathologic major response (pMR) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). The predictors related to overall survival and disease progression for these patients remain elusive. We aimed to identify factors that predict disease progression and overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients who achieve a pMR after neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the factors influencing survival and disease progression after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients who had a major response to CCRT, which is defined by complete pathological response or microscopic residual disease without lymph node metastasis. From our study cohort, 285 patients underwent CCRT and subsequent esophagectomy; 171 (60%) of these patients achieved pMR. After excluding patients with lymph node metastases, incomplete clinical data, and adenocarcinomas, we enrolled 117 patients in this study. We found that the CCRT regimen was the only factor that influenced overall survival. The overall survival of the patients receiving taxane-incorporated CCRT was superior to that of patients receiving traditional cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) ( = 0.011). The CCRT regimen can significantly influence the clinical outcome of esophageal SCC patients who achieve pMR after neoadjuvant CCRT and esophagectomy. Incorporation of taxanes into cisplatin-based CCRT may be associated with prolonged survival

    The value of enhanced CT scanning for predicting lymph node metastasis along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

    Get PDF
    Background: The right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RRLN) is the region most prone to lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Nodal involvement may be underestimated by traditional imaging prediction criteria, such as a short axis diameter of 10 mm. The purpose of this study was to determine a more accurate imaging criterion to guide clinical treatment strategy selection. Methods: The clinical data of 307 patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent surgery at Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2018 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Utilizing 1-mm layer thickness enhanced computed tomography (CT), the RRLN lymph node short diameter (LNSD) size was measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for lymph node metastasis along the RRLN. Results: In our study, RRLN lymph node metastasis occurred in 60 (19.5%) patients and general lymph node metastasis occurred in 150 (48.9%) patients. Of the resected lymph nodes along the RRLN, 14.5% (121/832) were positive. Multivariate analysis identified LNSD [odds ratio (OR), 1.236] as an independent risk factor for RRLN lymph node metastasis. In CT evaluation, a short diameter of 6.5 mm in the RRLN lymph nodes is a critical predictor of metastasis at this site (sensitivity =50%, specificity =83.4%) and a larger short diameter was associated with a higher risk of metastasis (P<0.001). Conclusions: A 6.5 mm cutoff in LNSD can be applied to clinically predict lymph node metastasis in the RRLN region for patients with ESCC

    Ablative Therapies for Colorectal Polyps and Malignancy

    No full text
    Endoscopic techniques are gaining popularity in the management of colorectal polyps and occasionally superficial cancers. While their use is in many times palliative, they have proven to be curative in carefully selected patients with polyps or malignancies, with less morbidity than radical resection. However, one should note that data supporting local and ablative therapies for colorectal cancer is scarce and may be subject to publication bias. Therefore, for curative intent, these techniques should only be considered in highly select cases as higher rates of local recurrences have also been reported. The aim of this review is to explain the different modalities of local and ablative therapies specific to colorectal neoplasia and explain the indications and circumstances where they have been most successful

    Ablative Therapy for Esophageal Dysplasia and Early Malignancy: Focus on RFA

    No full text
    Ablative therapies have been utilized with increasing frequency for the treatment of Barrett’s esophagus with and without dysplasia. Multiple modalities are available for topical ablation of the esophagus, but radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains the most commonly used. There have been significant advances in technique since the introduction of RFA. The aim of this paper is to review the indications, techniques, outcomes, and most common complications following esophageal ablation with RFA

    Evolving Ablative Therapies for Hepatic Malignancy

    No full text
    The liver is a common site for both primary and secondary malignancy. Hepatic resection and transplantation are the two treatment modalities that have been shown to achieve complete cure, but only 10 to 20% of patients are candidates for these treatments. For the remaining patients, tumor ablation has emerged as the most promising alternative modality. In addition to providing local control and improving survival outcomes, tumor ablation also helps to down stage patients for potential curative treatments, both alone as well as in combination with other treatments. While tumor ablation can be achieved in multiple ways, the introduction of newer ablative techniques has shifted the focus from palliation to potentially curative treatment. Because the long-term safety and survival benefits are not substantive at present, it is important that we strive to evaluate the results from these studies using appropriate comparative outcome methodologies
    corecore