121 research outputs found

    Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis

    Get PDF
    Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis.BackgroundIn peritoneal dialysis (PD) total net ultrafiltration (NUF) is dependent on transport through small pores and through water channels in the peritoneum. These channels are impermeable to solutes, and therefore, crystalloid osmotic-induced free water transport occurs through them. Several indirect methods to assess free water transport have been suggested. The difference in NUF between a 3.86% and a 1.36% solution gives a rough indication, but is very time consuming. The magnitude of the dip in dialysate/plasma (D/P) sodium in the initial phase of a 3.86% exchange is another way to estimate free water transport. In the present study, a method was applied to calculate free water transport by calculating sodium-associated water transport in one single 3.86% glucose dwell.MethodsForty PD patients underwent one standard peritoneal permeability analysis (SPA) with a 1.36% glucose solution, and another with a 3.86% glucose solution. At different time points intraperitoneal volume and sodium concentration were assessed. This made it possible to calculate total sodium transport. By subtracting this transport (which must have occurred through the small pores) from the total fluid transport, free water transport remained. These results were compared with the other methods to estimate free water transport.ResultsFor the 1.36% glucose dwell, total transcapillary ultrafiltration in the first hour (TCUF0-60) was 164 mL, transport through the small pores was 129 mL, and free water transport was 35 mL (21%). For the 3.86% glucose solution, total TCUF0-60 was 404 mL, transport through the small pores was 269 mL, and free water transport was 135 mL (34%). The contribution of free water transport in the first minute (TCUF0-1) was 39% of the total fluid transport. From the 40 patients, 11 patients had ultrafiltration failure (NUF <400 mL after 4 hours). For these patients the contribution of free water to TCUF0-1 was significantly lower than for those with normal ultrafiltration (20% vs. 48%, P < 0.05). A strong correlation was present between free water transport as a percentage of total fluid transport and the maximum dip in D/P sodium (r = 0.84). The correlation was not significant with the difference in net ultrafiltration of 3.86% and 1.36% solutions (r = 0.24, P = 0.3).ConclusionThe method applied here is the first direct quantification of free water transport, calculated from a single standard peritoneal function test. It offers a quick possibility to evaluate patients suffering from ultrafiltration failure. In these patients free water transport was impaired, but the origin of this impairment is still to be determined

    Augmenting solute clearance in peritoneal dialysis

    Get PDF
    Augmenting solute clearance in peritoneal dialysis.BackgroundThe removal of low molecular weight solutes by peritoneal dialysis is less than by hemodialysis. The targets for Kt/Vurea and creatinine clearance formulated in the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative are unlikely to be achieved in a substantial portion of peritoneal dialysis patients. Possibilities to increase small solute clearances have therefore been subject to many investigations.MethodsA review of the literature and of recent new data on determinants of solute removal, such as residual renal function, the role of drained dialysate volume and manipulation of the diffusive capacity of the peritoneum are presented.ResultsThe contribution of residual GFR is more important for the clearance of creatinine than for Kt/Vurea. It is even more important for the removal of organic acids that are removed from the body by tubular secretion. High dosages of furosemide increase the urinary volume and the fractional Na+ excretion, but have no effect on the magnitude of residual GFR, renal creatinine clearance, renal urea clearance, and peritoneal transport characteristics. The drained dialysate volume per day is the main determinant of the peritoneal removal of urea. Its effect decreases the higher the molecular weight of a solute. It can be augmented by using large instillation volumes, by the application of more exchanges, and by increasing peritoneal ultrafiltration. A large exchange volume is especially effective in patients with an average transport state, but in those with high solute transport rates, Kt/Vurea is especially influenced by the number of exchanges. Possibilities to increase ultrafiltration are discussed. The diffusive capacity of the peritoneum can be augmented by using low dosages of intraperitoneally administered nitroprusside. This increases solute transport most markedly when it is applied in combination with icodextrin as osmotic agent.ConclusionsSmall solutes clearances cannot be increased by furosemide. Increasing the instilled volume of dialysis fluid and the number of exchanges both affect solute clearance. Studies are necessary on long-term effects of manipulation of the peritoneal membrane with nitroprusside

    Icodextrin as salvage therapy in peritoneal dialysis patients with refractory fluid overload

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Icodextrin is a high molecular weight, starch-derived glucose polymer, which is capable of inducing sustained ultrafiltration over prolonged (12–16 hour) peritoneal dialysis (PD) dwells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of icodextrin to alleviate refractory, symptomatic fluid overload and prolong technique survival in PD patients. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, pre-test/post-test study was conducted in 17 PD patients (8 females/9 males, mean age 56.8 ± 2.9 years) who were on the verge of being transferred to haemodialysis because of symptomatic fluid retention that was refractory to fluid restriction, loop diuretic therapy, hypertonic glucose exchanges and dwell time optimisation. One icodextrin exchange (2.5 L 7.5%, 12-hour dwell) was substituted for a long-dwell glucose exchange each day. RESULTS: Icodextrin significantly increased peritoneal ultrafiltration (885 ± 210 ml to 1454 ± 215 ml, p < 0.05) and reduced mean arterial pressure (106 ± 4 to 96 ± 4 mmHg, p < 0.05), but did not affect weight, plasma albumin concentration, haemoglobin levels or dialysate:plasma creatinine ratio. Diabetic patients (n = 12) also experienced improved glycaemic control (haemoglobin Alc decreased from 8.9 ± 0.7% to 7.9 ± 0.7%, p < 0.05). Overall PD technique survival was prolonged by a mean of 11.6 months (95% CI 6.0–17.3 months). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, extension of technique survival by icodextrin was only significantly predicted by baseline net daily peritoneal ultrafiltration (adjusted HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.13–5.62, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Icodextrin significantly improved peritoneal ultrafiltration and extended technique survival in PD patients with symptomatic fluid overload, especially those who had substantially impaired peritoneal ultrafiltration

    Safety Issues of Long-Term Glucose Load in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis—A 7-Year Cohort Study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Effects of long-term glucose load on peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient safety and outcomes have seldom been reported. This study demonstrates the influence of long-term glucose load on patient and technique survival. METHODS: We surveyed 173 incident PD patients. Long-term glucose load was evaluated by calculating the average dialysate glucose concentration since initiation of PD. Risk factors were assessed by fitting Cox's models with repeatedly measured time-dependent covariates. RESULTS: We noted that older age, higher glucose concentration, and lower residual renal function (RRF) were significantly associated with a worse patient survival. We found that female gender, absence of diabetes, lower glucose concentration, use of icodextrin, higher serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and higher RRF were significantly associated with a better technique survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term glucose load predicted mortality and technique failure in chronic PD patients. These findings emphasize the importance of minimizing glucose load in PD patients

    Selection of modalities, prescription, and technical issues in children on peritoneal dialysis

    Get PDF
    Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is widely employed as a dialytic therapy for uraemic children, especially in its automated form (APD), that is associated with less burden of care on patient and family than continuous ambulatory PD. Since APD offers a wide range of treatment options, based on intermittent and continuous regimens, prescription can be individualized according to patient’s age, body size, residual renal function, nutritional intake, and growth-related metabolic needs. Transport capacity of the peritoneal membrane of each individual patient should be assessed, and regularly monitored, by means of standardized peritoneal function tests validated in pediatric patients. To ensure maximum recruitment of peritoneal exchange area, fill volume should be scaled to body surface area and adapted to each patient, according to clinical tolerance and intraperitoneal pressure. PD solutions should be employed according to their biocompatibility and potential ultrafiltration capacity; new pH-neutral, glucose-free solutions can be used in an integrated way in separate dwells, or by appropriately mixing during the same dialytic session. Kinetic modelling software programs may help in the tailoring of PD prescription to individual patients’ characteristics and needs. Owing to advances in the technology of new APD machines, greater programming flexibility, memorized delivery control, and tele-dialysis are currently possible

    Water channels in the peritoneum

    No full text
    corecore