Mechanical thrombectomy with the Trevo ProVue device in ischemic stroke patients: does improved visibility translate into a clinical benefit?

Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of the Trevo ProVue (TPV) stent retriever in stroke patients with large artery occlusions, with particular attention to the full structural radiopacity of the TPV. Materials and methods Case files and images of TPV treatments were reviewed for clinical and technical outcome data, including revascularization rates, device and procedure related complications, and outcome at discharge and after 90days. Results 76 patients were treated with TPV. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 18 and 68% had additional intravenous thrombolysis. 63 occlusions were in the anterior circulation: 44 M1 (58%), 8 M2 (11%), 8 internal carotid artery-terminus (11%), 2 internal carotid artery- left (3%), 1 A2 (1%), and 13 vertebrobasilar (17%). 58 of 76 (76%) were solely treated with TPV; the remainder were treated with additional stent retrievers. Mean number of passes in TPV only cases was 2.2 (SD 1.2). In rescue cases, 3.2 (SD 2.2) passes were attempted with the TPV followed by 2.6 rescue device passes (SD 2). TPV related adverse events occurred in 4/76 cases (5%) and procedural events in 6/76 cases (8%). Mean procedural duration was 64min (SD 42). Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b/3 recanalization was achieved in 69/76 patients (91%), including 50% TICI 3. Of 56 survivors (74%), 37 (49%) showed a favorable outcome at 90days (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy trial criteria), statistically associated with age, baseline NIHSS, onset to revascularization time, and TICI 2b-3 reperfusion. TPV radiopacity allowed for visual feedback, changing the methodology of stent retriever use in 44/76 cases (58%). Conclusions Neurothrombectomy with TPV is feasible, effective, and safe. The recanalization rate compares favorably with reported data in the literature. Improved structural radiopacity may facilitate neurothrombectomy or influence the course of action during retrieval

Intraoperative Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Monitoring the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Objectives: To investigate the effects of low- and high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) on the nucleus accumbens (ACC) and the adjacent internal capsule in 3 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under intraoperative conditions. Methods: After placement of the electrode in the right ACC, the patients underwent an MR scan inside the operating room. BOLD imaging was performed and interpreted using a boxcar paradigm with alternating high-frequency stimulation of the ACC and the internal capsule versus rest. Correlation maps were calculated employing SPM99. Results: During high-frequency stimulation of the right ACC, focal activation could be found in the right striatum, the right frontal lobe and the right hippocampus, whereas low-frequency stimulation was correlated to right insular activation. Interpretation: Intraoperative BOLD-fMRI is feasible during DBS surgery of OCD patients. Our results support the existence of an ipsilateral hemispheric circuit involving the frontal lobe, anterior cingulate, parahippocampal gyrus and striatum. Intraoperative fMRI may be used to acquire additional information regarding the pathophysiology of OCD that can be used to improve the results of DBS in OCD. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Base

Implantation of venous access devices under local anesthesia: patients' satisfaction with oral lorazepam

Objective: The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with implantation of venous access devices under local anesthesia (LA) with and without additional oral sedation. Materials and methods: A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the prospective descriptive study over a period of 6 months. Subcutaneous implantable venous access devices through the subclavian vein were routinely implanted under LA. Patients were offered an additional oral sedative (lorazepam) before each procedure. The level of anxiety/tension, the intensity of pain, and patients' satisfaction were evaluated before and immediately after the procedure using a visual analog scale (ranging from 0 to 10) with a standardized questionnaire. Results: Patients' satisfaction with the procedure was high (mean: 1.3 +/- 2.0) with no significant difference between the group with premedication and the group with LA alone (P=0.54). However, seven out of 30 patients (23.3%) in the group that received premedication would not undergo the same procedure without general anesthesia. There was no significant influence of lorazepam on the intensity of pain (P=0.88). In 12 out of 30 patients (40%) in the premedication group, the level of tension was higher than 5 on the visual analog scale during the procedure. In 21 out of 77 patients (27.3%), the estimate of the level of tension differed between the interventionist and the patient by 3 or more points in 21 out of 77 patients (27.3%). Conclusion: Overall patient satisfaction is high for implantation of venous access devices under LA. A combination of LA with lorazepam administered orally might not be adequate for patients with a high level of anxiety and tension. The level of tension is often underestimated by the interventionist. Pre-procedural standardized questionnaires could be used to identify patients for whom a gradual approach of individualized sedation may be more effective