Neural RNA-binding protein Musashi1 inhibits translation initiation by competing with eIF4G for PABP

Musashi1 (Msi1) is an RNA-binding protein that is highly expressed in neural stem cells. We previously reported that Msi1 contributes to the maintenance of the immature state and self-renewal activity of neural stem cells through translational repression of m-Numb. However, its translation repression mechanism has remained unclear. Here, we identify poly(A) binding protein (PABP) as an Msi1-binding protein, and find Msi1 competes with eIF4G for PABP binding. This competition inhibits translation initiation of Msi1's target mRNA. Indeed, deletion of the PABP-interacting domain in Msi1 abolishes its function. We demonstrate that Msi1 inhibits the assembly of the 80S, but not the 48S, ribosome complex. Consistent with these conclusions, Msi1 colocalizes with PABP and is recruited into stress granules, which contain the stalled preinitiation complex. However, Msi1 with mutations in two RNA recognition motifs fails to accumulate into stress granules. These results provide insight into the mechanism by which sequence-specific translational repression occurs in stem cells through the control of translation initiation

Cap-dependent eukaryotic initiation factor-mRNA interactions probed by cross-linking

Cap-dependent ribosome recruitment to eukaryotic mRNAs during translation initiation is stimulated by the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F complex and eIF4B. eIF4F is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three subunits: eIF4E, a 7-methyl guanosine cap binding protein; eIF4A, a DEAD-box RNA helicase; and eIF4G. The interactions of eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4B with mRNA have previously been monitored by chemical- and UV-based cross-linking approaches aimed at characterizing the initial protein/mRNA interactions that lead to ribosome recruitment. These studies have led to a model whereby eIF4E interacts with the 7-methyl guanosine cap structure in an ATP-independent manner, followed by an ATP-dependent interaction of eIF4A and eIF4B. Herein, we apply a splint-ligation-mediated approach to generate 4-thiouridine-containing mRNA adjacent to a radiolabel group that we utilize to monitor cap-dependent cross-linking of proteins adjacent to, and downstream from, the cap structure. Using this approach, we demonstrate interactions between eIF4G, eIF4H, and eIF3 subunits with the mRNA during the cap recognition process

RNA aptamers to mammalian initiation factor 4G inhibit cap-dependent translation by blocking the formation of initiation factor complexes

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) plays a crucial multimodulatory role in mRNA translation and decay by interacting with other translation factors and mRNA-associated proteins. In this study, we isolated eight different RNA aptamers with high affinity to mammalian eIF4G by in vitro RNA selection amplification. Of these, three aptamers (apt3, apt4, and apt5) inhibited the cap-dependent translation of two independent mRNAs in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. The cap-independent translation directed by an HCV internal ribosome entry site was not affected. Addition of exogenous eIF4G reversed the aptamer-mediated inhibition of translation. Even though apt3 and apt4 were selected independently, they differ only by two nucleotides. The use of truncated eIF4G variants in binding experiments indicated that apt4 (and probably apt3) bind to both the middle and C-terminal domains of eIF4G, while apt5 binds only to the middle domain of eIF4G. Corresponding to the difference in the binding sites in eIF4G, apt4, but not apt5, hindered eIF4G from binding to eIF4A and eIF3, in a purified protein solution system as well as in a crude lysate system. Therefore, the inhibition of translation by apt4 (and apt3) is due to the inhibition of formation of initiation factor complexes involving eIF4A and eIF3. On the other hand, apt5 had a much weaker affinity to eIF4G than apt4, but inhibited translation much more efficiently by an unknown mechanism. The five additional aptamers have sequences and predicted secondary structures that are largely different from each other and from apt3 through apt5. Therefore, we speculate that these seven sets of aptamers may bind to different regions in eIF4G in different fashions