Method of refining 2,2-isopropylidenebis-3,5- dibromophenylene-4-oxydiethanol

A method of refining 2,2-isopropylidenebis-3,5-dibromophenylene-4-oxydiethanol is described which is characterized by recrystallization of 2,2-isopropylidenebis-3,5-dibromophenylene-4-oxydiethanol using one or more aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, xylene, toluene, ethylbenzene or pseudocumene

How should tracers be injected to detect for sentinel nodes in gastric cancer – submucosally from inside or subserosally from outside of the stomach?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In sentinel node (SN) detection for cases of early gastric cancer, the submucosal dye injection method appears to be more reasonable than the subserosal injection. To compare the two injection methods, we have focused on the rate of concordance between hot nodes (HNs) obtained from the radioisotope (RI) method and green nodes (GNs) obtained from the dye-guided method in addition to the number and distribution of GNs detected, and the sensitivity of metastatic detection.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The subjects of this study were 63 consecutive patients with gastric cancer (sT1–T2, sN0, tumor diameter ≦ 4 cm) in whom we attempted SN detection using a combination of RI and dye methods. ^99mTc-tin colloid was injected a day before the surgery, and indocyanine green was injected either submucosally (n = 43) with endoscopes or subserosally (n = 20) by direct vision.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>An average of hot and green nodes (H&G: 4 ± 3 vs. 4 ± 3), hot and non-green nodes (H&NG: 2 ± 3 vs. 1 ± 2), cold and green nodes (C&G: 2 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 4), and the rate of concordance (H&G/H&G + H&NG + C&G: 45 + 27% vs. 48 ± 30%) were not significantly different between the submucosal and subserosal injection methods. The spread of GNs to tier 2 stations (24% vs. 30%) and metastatic detection sensitivity (86% vs. 100%) were also not different between the submucosal and subserosal injection methods.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The tracer injection sites do not have to be limited to the submucosa.</p

Identification of the high-risk group for metastasis of gastric cancer cases by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 overexpression in peripheral blood

Identification of an isolated tumour cell with metastatic ability is important for predicting the recurrence and prognosis of gastric cancer. A biological marker for evaluating the metastatic ability of gastric cancer cells has not yet been identified. We assessed vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 mRNA expression by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 mRNA in peripheral blood was more highly expressed in perioperative metastasis-positive and postoperative recurrence cases than in normal control cases, early cancer cases and nonmetastatic advanced cancer cases. The peripheral blood vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 mRNA-positive group was associated with advanced clinical stage, deep invasion beyond the muscularis propria, lymphatic involvement, vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, positive peritoneal lavage cytology, preoperative metastasis and postoperative recurrence. Flow cytometry analysis disclosed that vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 expressing cells in the peripheral blood were more abundant in cancer cases with metastases than in cases without metastases. Our data suggest that the amount of positive cells may provide information on the clinical features of gastric cancer, especially in regard to gastric cancer metastasis