Water Governance in Decentralising Indonesia

Under new democratic regimes in the country of the South, governance innovation is often found at the regional level. This article, using the concept of institutional capacity, shows that powerful efforts affecting regional water resource coordination emerge locally. The paper analyzes fresh water cooperation in the urban region of Cirebon, Indonesia. It is shown that city and their surrounding regions in decentralizing Indonesia show signs of increasing institutional capacity between local actors. An informal approach and discretionary local decision-making, influenced by logic of appropriateness and tolerance are influential. At the same time, these capacities are compromised by significant inequality and a unilateral control of water resources, and they are being challenged by a strong authoritarian political culture inherited from a history of centralized government. The paper points to the need to establish greater opportunities for water governance at the regional level to transcend inter-local rivalry, and thus improve decentralized institutional capacity further

Nutrition in agricultural development: Land settlement in coast province, Kenya

ASC – Publicaties niet-programma gebonde

Reduction in the cost of pre-combustion CO2 capture through advancements in sorption-enhanced water-gas-shift

AbstractSorption-enhanced water-gas-shift (SEWGS) is a pre-combustion decarbonisation technology combining adsorption of CO2 with the water-gas-shift reaction. This process maximises the production of hydrogen from syngas whilst simultaneously capturing and separating CO2.Simulations have been completed to evaluate the use of SEWGS for power generation from natural gas with carbon capture. The modelling results show that using the SEWGS process could significantly reduce the cost of capturing CO2 versus a reference design that uses amine absorption. Work has also been completed to show that using a counter-current steam-rinse step may be an improvement over a co-current CO2-rinse cycle proposed previously

The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) on the health status of postlingually deaf adults. METHODS: Participants comprised 45 postlingually deaf adult multichannel CI users and 46 deaf candidates on the waiting list for a CI. The latter group acted as control subjects to corroborate the validity of retrospective completion of the questionnaires by the CI recipients. Three HRQOL instruments were used: a) a specially developed CI questionnaire (NCIQ); b) a generic HRQOL questionnaire (SF-36); and c) a health-state classification system (HUI-2) suited to estimate single preference scores. RESULTS: Retrospectively estimated pre-implant scores in the CI user group corresponded very well with the scores in the control group. Postimplant scores in the CI users were substantially higher in all six domains (p < .001) of the NCIQ than the scores in the control group. Effects due to a CI were also observed with the SF-36 in five of the seven domains (p < .01). Statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = .001) were observed in two of the six domains of the HUI-2. CONCLUSIONS: All three questionnaires detected improvements in HRQOL due to CI use. To make a detailed assessment of the effect of a CI on functional outcomes and well-being, a special purpose HRQOL instrument is far more adequate than a general HRQOL instrument. This study also showed that a CI affects several other health domains besides auditory performance. The effect of CI use on general functioning and well-being proved to be considerable

Corrigendum: Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (vol. 123, pg. 756, 2000)

Hinderink JB, Krabbe PFM, van den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:756-765. (Original DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.108203) In the Code book portion of the Appendix for this article, the “Advanced Sound Perception” and “Speech Production” rows were interchanged in the “Question” column. Additionally, item 53 should be recorded in the “Social Interactions” row, “Recording” colum