8 research outputs found

    Feasibility of telemedicine program using a hand-held nonmydriatic retinal camera in Panama

    No full text
    AimTo evaluate the image quality of a telemedicine screening program for retinal disease using a nonmydriatic camera among rural island communities in Bocas del Toro, Panama.MethodsIn June 2018, a group of three medical students volunteered at clinics operated by the Floating Doctors in the province of Bocas del Toro, Panama. Non-mydriatic images of the retina were obtained using the Pictor Plus (Volk Optical, Mentor OH), randomized, and sent to two board-certified ophthalmologists at the University of California, Irvine for analysis using a modified version of the FOTO-ED scale. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using the kappa statistic.ResultsSeventy patients provided a total of 127 images. Average image quality was 3.31, and most frequent image quality was 4/5 on the FOTO-ED scale. Thirty patients had at least one eye image with ideal quality (42.86%), while only one patient had no adequate photos taken (1.43%). However, high quality images were obtained in both eyes in only 12 patients (17.14%). The inter-rater reliability between the two ophthalmologists was 0.614.ConclusionFurther improvements are necessary to acquire higher quality images more reliably. This may include further training and experience or mydriasis

    Abstract Number ‐ 137: Delayed aneurysmal rupture of a giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysm after flow‐diversion embolization with adjunctive coiling

    No full text
    Introduction Vertebrobasilar aneurysms carry a high risk of operative morbidity and high mortality risk with rupture. Treatment with flow diversion embolization has gained popularity. While adjunctive coiling may lower the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture (DAR), DAR can occur during stent endothelialization. describe a case of DAR following flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization of a giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm and review the literature to further characterize this phenomenon. Methods PubMed was queried using search terms: “delayed,” “aneurysm,” “rupture,” “flow diverter,” “flow diversion,” and “flow diverting stent” yielding 220 results. There were 47 studies describing 89 patients with DAR after flow diversion. Results A forty‐five‐year‐old male presented with posterior fossa compression symptoms secondary to a 30‐mm fusiform basilar artery aneurysm, which grew during short‐interval follow‐up to 35 mm. The patient consented to endovascular embolization. Tri‐axial catheter access system was used to deploy seven telescoping flow diverters from the basilar tip to the intradural left vertebral artery, and nine coils were subsequently deployed in the aneurysm dome. The right vertebral artery was coil embolized. The procedure was uncomplicated and the patient was continued on dual‐antiplatelet therapy. Four weeks later, the patient became unresponsive with absent brainstem reflexes, workup revealed diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage. Digital subtraction angiography demonstrated contrast extravasation at the aneurysm neck. He succumbed to his neurological injury two days later. Out of 89 patients with DAR after flow diversion, only 3 occurred in fusiform basilar aneurysms treated with adjunctive coil embolization. Only one case, a 37.1‐mm aneurysm treated with 3 flow diverters with adjunctive embolization, occurred at greater than 30 days post‐intervention. Conclusions This case highlights the need to better characterize the role of adjunctive coiling with flow diversion for large or giant aneurysms, and to better understand risk factors related to delayed aneurysm rupture

    Cost analysis comparison between anterior and posterior cervical spine approaches.

    No full text
    BackgroundThe costs of cervical spine surgery have steadily increased. We performed a 5-year propensity scoring-matched analysis of 276 patients undergoing anterior versus posterior cervical surgery at one institution.MethodsWe performed propensity score matching on financial data from 276 patients undergoing 1-3 level anterior versus posterior cervical fusions for degenerative disease (2015-2019).ResultsWe found no significant difference between anterior versus posterior approaches for hospital costs (42,529.63vs.42,529.63 vs. 45,110.52), net revenue (40,877.25vs.40,877.25 vs. 34,036.01), or contribution margins (14,230.19vs.14,230.19 vs. 6,312.54). Multivariate regression analysis showed variables significantly associated with the lower contribution margins included age (β = -392.3) and length of stay (LOS; β = -1151). Removing age/LOS from the analysis, contribution margins were significantly higher for the anterior versus posterior approach (17,824.16vs.17,824.16 vs. 6,312.54, P = 0.01).ConclusionAnterior cervical surgery produced higher contribution margins compared to posterior approaches, most likely because posterior surgery was typically performed in older patients requiring longer LOS

    Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review

    No full text
    Abstract Introduction Interventional treatment options for the lumbar degenerative spine have undergone a significant amount of innovation over the last decade. As new technologies emerge, along with the surgical specialty expansion, there is no manuscript that utilizes a review of surgical treatments with evidence rankings from multiple specialties, namely, the interventional pain and spine communities. Through the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS), the purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced evidence review of available surgical treatments. Methods The PSPS Research Committee created a working group that performed a comprehensive literature search on available surgical technologies for the treatment of the degenerative spine, utilizing the ranking assessment based on USPSTF (United States Preventative Services Taskforce) and NASS (North American Spine Society) criteria. Results The surgical treatments were separated based on disease process, including treatments for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis. Conclusions There is emerging and significant evidence to support multiple approaches to treat the symptomatic lumbar degenerative spine. As new technologies become available, training, education, credentialing, and peer review are essential for optimizing patient safety and successful outcomes
    corecore