Real-Life ILUVIEN (Fluocinolone Acetonide) Case Study: Rapid Drying of the Macula and Improved Vision within 2 Years after Therapy Initiation

Importance: A case showing sustained structural and functional responses 2 years after a single treatment with ILUVIEN (0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide, FAc) despite suboptimal responses to ranibizumab. Observations: A 68-year-old female patient with diabetic macular oedema (DME) from type 2 diabetes mellitus was first diagnosed in October 2010 and had a baseline visual acuity (VA) of 46 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the left eye. Central foveal thickness (CFT) was 712 microns. The patient was treated with 11 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (5 in combination with a small-interfering RNA agent), and by March 2014, VA and CFT were largely unchanged (55 ETDRS letters and 774 microns). The patient was treated with ILUVIEN as she had a pseudophakic lens and a clearly suboptimal response to the prior therapy with ranibizumab. An implant releasing FAc at a dosage of 0.2 µg/day was administered in March 2014, and the optical coherence tomography indicated that the macula was dry after 7 days (CFT was below 300 microns). This was sustained at 6, 12, and 24 months after the treatment. VA improved by 5 letters within 7 days and by 15 letters within 14 days, and this was maintained after 24 months. Throughout the duration of this study, the intraocular pressure was ≤22 mm Hg, and no glaucoma medication was administered. Conclusions and Relevance: In real-life UK practice, this DME patient showed a suboptimal response to multiple intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. When subsequently treated with a single injection of ILUVIEN, there were large and rapid improvements in VA and CFT that were maintained for the following 2 years

Case Series Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Bilateral Fluocinolone Acetonide (ILUVIEN®) in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: 10 Eyes with 12 Months Follow-up

<p><b>Article full text</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>The full text of this article can be found here<b>.</b> <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40123-016-0049-3?view=classic">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40123-016-0049-3?view=classic</a></p><p></p> <p><br></p> <p><b>Provide enhanced content for this article</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/”mailto:[email protected]”"><b>[email protected]</b></a>.</p> <p><br></p> <p>The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:</p> <p><br></p> <p>• Slide decks</p> <p>• Videos and animations</p> <p>• Audio abstracts</p> <p>• Audio slides</p

Ruthenium plaque radiotherapy in the current era of retinoblastoma treatment

BACKGROUND: Two major treatment modalities for retinoblastoma, intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravitreal chemotherapy (IVitC), have superseded external beam radiotherapy for eye salvage. In this new setting our objectives were to evaluate the indications for plaque radiotherapy, complications, and recurrence rates. METHODS: Retrospective detailed review of patient's charts was performed for all subjects treated with plaque radiotherapy for retinoblastoma between January 2015 and December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 12 eyes of 12 patients were included. Mean age at plaque insertion was 45 months (median 29, range 17-150). The treatment dose was 40 Gy to the tumor apex. The indication for plaque radiotherapy was salvage therapy in 11 eyes (92%) and primary treatment in one eye (8%). At last follow-up from plaque insertion (mean 36 months, range 3-67), four (33%) patients had visual acuity better than 0.5 LogMAR and four (33%) had visual acuity worse than 1.0 LogMAR. Radiation-related complications were: one (8%) vitreous haemorrhage, two (16%) non-proliferative radiation retinopathy and one (8%) cataract. Recurrence was detected in four (33%) patients at a mean of 7.8 months (median 5, range 1-20) post-plaque. Globe salvage rate was 75%, as three eyes required enucleation, one to treat recurrence of the tumor treated with plaque and two to treat recurrence of other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era of retinoblastoma management, a role for plaque radiotherapy remains for salvage or primary treatment in eyes with localised active tumor, providing tumor control in 66%. Close observation is recommended to both detect recurrence and radiation-related complications