Capabilities overview of the MORET 5 Monte Carlo code

The MORET code is a simulation tool that solves the transport equation for neutrons using the Monte Carlo method. It allows users to model complex three-dimensional geometrical configurations, describe the materials, define their own tallies in order to analyse the results. The MORET code has been initially designed to perform calculations for criticality safety assessments. New features has been introduced in the MORET 5 code to expand its use for reactor applications. This paper presents an overview of the MORET 5 code capabilities, going through the description of materials, the geometry modelling, the transport simulation and the definition of the outputs

Validation of the MORET 5 code for Criticality Safety Applications

The MORET 5 Monte Carlo code includes two calculation routes: a multi-group route based on cross-sections calculated from various preliminary cell codes and a continuous energy calculation route. The criticality experimental validation database is made up of 2255 benchmarks, mainly taken from the Handbook of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluated Experiments Project or performed in French facilities. Most of them have been investigated with the two different routes. The calculation results are generally in good agreement with the benchmarks, depending on the nuclear data used

Experimental evaluation of seven quality control phantoms for digital breast tomosynthesis

International audiencePurposes: The introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) into the French breast cancer screening program is forecast by the authorities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate image quality phantoms to be used as internal quality controls. Methods: Seven breast phantoms dedicated to quality control in mammography were evaluated on reconstructed DBT images: ACR Model 015, BR3D, DBT QC model 021, Mam/Digi-EPQC, MTM100, TOMOMAM® and TOMOPHAN®. Two representative image parameters of DBT images were studied: image score and z-resolution, when inserts were included in the phantom, on five DBT systems of three different brands. Three observers were involved. Results: The MTM100, Mam/Digi-EPQC, BR3D, DBT QC model 021 phantoms' images presented artefacts affecting the image score. The ACR Model 015, TOMOMAM® and TOMOPHAN® phantoms appeared to be pertinent for DBT image score analysis. Due to saturation artefacts, Z-resolution results were not coherent with the theory for all phantoms except by using aluminium beads in the TOMOMAM® phantom. Conclusions: Phantom manufacturers should be encouraged to collaborate with DBT system manufacturers in order to design universal phantoms suitable for all systems for more complete quality control. From our study we can propose several specifications for an ideal and universal phantom designed for internal quality control in DBT. Phantoms should allow sensitive image score measurements. The background structure should be realistic to avoid artefacts. Phantoms should have a standard breast-like shape and size. © 2019 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medic