12,452 research outputs found

    The weight in a Serre-type conjecture for tame n-dimensional Galois representations

    Full text link
    We formulate a Serre-type conjecture for n-dimensional Galois representations that are tamely ramified at p. The weights are predicted using a representation-theoretic recipe. For n = 3 some of these weights were not predicted by the previous conjecture of Ash, Doud, Pollack, and Sinnott. Computational evidence for these extra weights is provided by calculations of Doud and Pollack. We obtain theoretical evidence for n = 4 using automorphic inductions of Hecke characters.Comment: 68 pages, revised (mainly added appendix that generalises Jantzen's theorem on the reduction modulo p of Deligne--Lusztig representations

    DOMA and Diffusion Theory: Ending Animus Legislation through a Rational Basis Approach

    Get PDF
    Same-sex couple rights are the topic of much discussion and debate. There are court challenges to the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) as well as proposed marriage statutes. The message and the structure for the recognition of same-sex rights need to be modified. This Article proposes applying, for the first time in the area, modern sociology theory, specifically Diffusion Theory, to change how the message is delivered. Using Diffusion Theory to change the message frame will change judicial decisions. By using the backdrop of the Florida adoption statute, a comparison between the successful challenges to the Florida statute is made to the current challenges to DOMA. This challenge shows how, through the Diffusion lens, same-sex couples were able to change judicial opinion through empathy

    Justice for All: Reimagining the Internal Revenue Service

    Get PDF
    The ability of the Internal Revenue Service to both collect the tax and enforce the initial determination of tax liability in a neutral and fair manner has been compromised by a February 2011 pronouncement issued by the Department of Justice stating that the President and the Department of Justice believe that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional and that the Department of Justice will no longer defend the statute in courts. The pronouncement results in a disparate treatment of similar taxpayers based solely on the forum of litigation. Through this lens, I examine whether it is proper for the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service to continue to share prosecutorial powers when such results are possible. Assuming that any incremental improvement is desirable as long as does not harm one person, I conclude that the Department of Justice should have exclusive litigation authority to protect against this very result

    Carried Interest: Can They Effectively Be Taxed?

    Get PDF
    During the April 2008 Democratic Debate, former Senator Obama with former Senator Clinton almost referred to the subject matter of this article verbatim at page three of the transcript. ( We saw an article today which showed that the top 50 hedge fund managers made 29billionlastyear29 billion last year-- 29 billion for 50 individuals. And part of what has happened is that those who are able to work the stock market and amass huge fortunes on capital gains are paying a lower tax rate than their secretaries. That\u27s not fair. ) (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/DemocraticDebate/story?id= 46702 71&page= 1). As stated by both candidates, the budget is going to be a major source of contention, and revenue raisers, such as the proposed legislation under Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 710, will be a hot button item. It was estimated by a Congressional committee that the fund managers would save 30billionintaxesoverthenexttenyearsiftherulesdidnotchange.Aspromised,onpage122ofPresidentObama2˘7s2009budgetistheproposaltotaxcarriedinterestasordinaryincome.Itissuggestedthatthischangewillraise30 billion in taxes over the next ten years if the rules did not change. As promised, on page 122 of President Obama \u27s 2009 budget is the proposal to tax carried interest as ordinary income. It is suggested that this change will raise 2.7 billion in tax revenue in 2011. The initial public offering (IPO) of Blackstone Group stock caused a public and political backlash when an IPO memorandum showed how much built-up gain existed in Alternative Investment Vehicles ( AIVs ). These offerings spurred public interest in the quantitative net worth of the owners of the funds, like Stephen A. Schwarzman, a cofounder of Blackstone, and the tax rates paid by these owner individuals. Congress also began to focus on the tax loopholes allowing these owner-individuals to monetize their carried interest at a significantly reduced tax. This surge in public interest combined with political needs for offsets to eliminate the alternative minimum tax led several influential lawmakers to seek passage of tax legislation that would reduce the tax incentives currently in place. These tax incentives primarily benefited managers of AIVs. The legislation was introduced most predominately in HR. 2834, which sought to add I.R.C. § 710 to the Code, changing the treatment of distributions to the service partners from capital gain rates to ordinary income rates. Thus, the bill contains provisions that seek to completely reverse over thirty years of jurisprudence with a shotgun approach in attempting to solve what is deemed an injustice by some. This article addresses the social equity arguments and the tax and economic theories to solve the perceived problem. Will the managers, if subjected to higher taxes, attempt to maximize the value for the investors? If one believes that there are enough people who want to be rich, then there is no reason to further incentivize the fund managers by taxing the fruit of their labor at reduced rates. There will always be ambitious and smart people who would be more than happy to step in and do these services even at higher tax rates. Further, it has been argued that a lower tax rate will not be sufficient to change the behavior of this category of individuals. One would have to demonstrate that fund managers would have to either reduce their current work efforts, if the rates were raised, or that this class of individuals is more sensitive to tax incentives than other professions. The article then concludes with a thorough discussion of the current law and the proposed changes to solve the social inequity. The article discusses the proposed H.R. 2834 and whether the proposed tax legislation will ultimately be successful in raising revenues as Congress intends. The article concludes with a thorough discussion of the current law and the proposed changes. Under the proposed legislation, the result would be to tax the general partner at ordinary income rates. This would mirror the treatment of nonqualified stock options. The carried interest would still retain the deferral characteristic but would be taxed when they are redeemed by the fund managers at ordinary income rates. However, it is argued that this approach would lead to tax planning such as the utilization of loans

    Am I the Only Person Paying Taxes? The Largest Tax Loophole for the Rich - Exchange Funds

    Get PDF
    President Obama is faced with a national debt at over 11trillionandneedstofundprojectssuchasNationalHealthCarewithanevershrinkingtaxbase.Astheeconomyhasslowed,sohavetaxrevenues.Itwouldthenmakesenseforthegovernmenttoreexaminetaxcarveoutsthatonlybenefitthewealthy.Infact,PresidentObamaisonrecordsayinghewantstoeliminatetaxloopholes.Afteralmostfiftyyears,thetimeisripetoeliminateoneofthefewcongressionallyauthorizedtaxloopholesthe11 trillion and needs to fund projects such as National Health Care with an ever-shrinking tax base. As the economy has slowed, so have tax revenues. It would then make sense for the government to reexamine tax carve-outs that only benefit the wealthy. In fact, President Obama is on record saying he wants to eliminate tax loopholes. After almost fifty years, the time is ripe to eliminate one of the few congressionally authorized tax loopholes—the 30 billion Exchange Funds. This Article addresses the social equity arguments and the tax and economic theories to solve the perceived problem. The Article thoroughly covers, through unique access to materials not available in traditional legal sources, including fund private placement memorandum, the basics of fund details, fund formations, and the tax rules, and suggests solutions to solve the social inequity. This Article not only proposes how to create legislation to tax the current arrangements but offers a solution utilizing the Code and Regulations to tax these vehicles

    Adequate groups of low degree

    Full text link
    The notion of adequate subgroups was introduced by Jack Thorne [42]. It is a weakening of the notion of big subgroups used in generalizations of the Taylor-Wiles method for proving the automorphy of certain Galois representations. Using this idea, Thorne was able to strengthen many automorphy lifting theorems. It was shown in [22] that if the dimension is small compared to the characteristic then all absolutely irreducible representations are adequate. Here we extend the result by showing that, in almost all cases, absolutely irreducible kG-modules in characteristic p, whose irreducible G+-summands have dimension less than p (where G+ denotes the subgroup of G generated by all p-elements of G), are adequate.Comment: 60 page

    On the existence of admissible supersingular representations of pp-adic reductive groups

    Full text link
    Suppose that G\mathbf{G} is a connected reductive group over a finite extension F/QpF/\mathbb{Q}_p, and that CC is a field of characteristic pp. We prove that the group G(F)\mathbf{G}(F) admits an irreducible admissible supercuspidal, or equivalently supersingular, representation over CC.Comment: 58 pages, with an appendix by Sug Woo Shin. This replaces arXiv:1712.10142 and arXiv:1808.08255. v2: Minor changes following referee report; to appear in Forum Math. Sigm
    corecore