Gemcitabine delivered by fucoidan/chitosan nanoparticles presents increased toxicity over human breast cancer cells

Aim: To produce marine-origin nanoparticles (NPs) aiming to develop more effective and tolerated therapies for breast cancer. Materials & methods: NPs based in two marine-origin polymers (fucoidan and chitosan) were prepared by polyelectrolyte complexation, for the delivery of an antitumor drug model (gemcitabine [Gem]). Results: Final formulation resulted in stable NPs around 115â 140 nm in size and with a polydispersity index less than 0.2. Gem was encapsulated at a maximum entrapment efficiency of 35â 42%. Drug-release studies demonstrated that around 84% of Gem is released within 4 h. Cytotoxicity results of Gem-loaded NPs showed increased toxicity (around 25%) when compared with free Gem. Conclusion: The drug-loaded NPs present increased toxicity over human breast cancer cells without increasing toxic effects over endothelial cells.The authors thank the PhD scholarship of C Oliveira for ‘NORTE-08-5369-000037’ financed by NORTE 2020, Portuguese Foundation for Science and Tecnology (FCT) for the investigator grant of A Martins for (IF/00376/2014) and the support from European Research Council under the Advanced Grant ComplexiTE. The work here reported also received financial support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Structured Project ‘Accelerating tissue engineering and personalized medicine discoveries by the integration of key enabling nanotechnologies, marine-derived biomaterials and stem cells’ (NORTE-01-0145FEDER-000021),supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Program(NORTE2020), under the PORTUGAL2020 Partnership Agreement. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: results of an Argentinean multicentre phase II trial

The activity and mild toxicity profile of single-agent gemcitabine therapy in untreated (chemonaive) patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well documented. This phase II trial was conducted to determine the objective tumour response rate and toxicity profile of single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with NSCLC. Patients with histological evidence of advanced NCSLC stage IIIB or IV; at least one prior chemotherapy regimen including a platinum or taxane analogue; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2; clinically measurable disease; adequate bone marrow reserve; and adequate renal function; received 1000 mg m–2 gemcitabine administered over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle defined as 3 weekly treatments followed by 1 week of rest. Twenty-nine patients were evaluated for efficacy and 32 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and five patients had a partial response resulting in a total response rate of 20.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6–34). Median response duration was 7 months (range 4–11 months). Twelve (41%) patients reached stable disease after two cycles of therapy and 11 (38%) patients had disease progression. Median progression-free survival time was 3 months and median overall survival time was 5.5 months. Toxicity was generally mild (grades 0–2). Severe (grade 3 or 4) haematological toxicities included grade 3 anaemia in one patient and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Severe non-haematological toxicities included one patient each with grade 3 liver transaminase elevations, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea. This study confirms the activity and safety of single-agent gemcitabine in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC who are refractory or sensitive to first-line therapy. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

A phase I study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral UFT for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A phase I study was carried out to determine the optimal dose and administration schedule for combined UFT plus gemcitabine therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Twenty-four patients (including 11 patients previously treated with cisplatin as the key drug) received oral UFT 400 mg m−2 on days 1 to 14 with intravenous infusions of gemcitabine (800 mg m−2 on days 8 and 15, or 900 mg m−2 on days 8 and 15, or 900 mg m−2 on days 1, 8 and 15). The most appropriate dosing option appeared to be 400 mg m−2 per day of oral UFT for 14 consecutive days with 900 mg m−2 gemcitabine on days 8 and 15. Eight of the 24 patients achieved partial response. The combination chemotherapy UFT and gemcitabine was well tolerated and may benefit patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A multicentre phase II study using a 3-weekly regimen is in progress

First-line therapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel in locally, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A phase II study

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (G) plus paclitaxel (T) as first-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received G 1200 mg/m(2 )on days 1 and 8, and T 175 mg/m(2 )on day 1 (before G) every 21 days for a maximum of 10 cycles. RESULTS: Forty patients, 39 metastatic breast cancer and 1 locally-advanced disease, were enrolled. Their median age was 61.5 years, and 85% had a World Health Organization performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. Poor prognostic factors at baseline included visceral involvement (87.5%) and ≥2 metastatic sites (70%). Also, 27 (67.5%) patients had prior adjuvant chemotherapy, 25 of which had prior anthracyclines. A total of 220 cycles (median 6; range, 1–10) were administered. Of the 40 enrolled patients, 2 had complete response and 12 partial response, for an overall response rate of 35.0% for intent-to-treat population. Among 35 patients evaluable for efficacy the response rate was 40%. Additional 14 patients had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 12 months; median time to progression, 7.2 months; median survival, 25.7 months. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia in 17 (42.5%) patients each, grade 3 leukopenia in 19 (47.5%), and grade 3 alopecia in 30 (75.0%) patients; 1 (2.5%) patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: GT exhibited encouraging activity and tolerable toxicity as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Phase III trials for further evaluation are ongoing

Inhibitory effect of ginsenoside Rg3 combined with gemcitabine on angiogenesis and growth of lung cancer in mice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Ginsenoside Rg3, a saponin extracted from ginseng, inhibits angiogenesis. The combination of low-dose chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic inhibitors suppresses growth of experimental tumors more effectively than conventional therapy or anti-angiogenic agent alone. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine combined with ginsenoside Rg3 on angiogenesis and growth of established Lewis lung carcinoma in mice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>C57L/6 mice implanted with Lewis lung carcinoma were randomized into the control, ginsenoside Rg3, gemcitabine and combination group. The quality of life and survival of mice were recorded. Tumor volume, inhibitive rate and necrosis rate were estimated. Necrosis of tumor and signals of blood flow as well as dynamic parameters of arterial blood flow in tumors such as peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI) were detected by color Doppler ultrasound. In addition, expression of vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) and CD31 were observed by immunohistochemstry, and microvessel density (MVD) of the tumor tissues was assessed by CD31 immunohistochemical analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Quality of life of mice in the ginsenoside Rg3 and combination group were better than in the control and gemcitabine group. Combined therapy with ginsenoside Rg3 and gemcitabine not only enhanced efficacy on suppression of tumor growth and prolongation of the survival, but also increased necrosis rate of tumor significantly. In addition, the combination treatment could obviously decrease VEGF expression and MVD as well as signals of blood flow and PSV in tumors.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Ginsenoside Rg3 combined with gemcitabine may significantly inhibit angiogenesis and growth of lung cancer and improve survival and quality of life of tumor-bearing mice. The combination of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs may be an innovative and promising therapeutic strategy in the experimental treatment of human lung cancer.</p

Docetaxel and gemcitabine activity in NSCLC cell lines and in primary cultures from human lung cancer

The activity of the following drugs was investigated in two established NSCLC cell lines: docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, doxorubicin (0.01, 0.1, 1 μg ml−1), cisplatin, ifosfamide (1, 2, 3 μg ml−1) and carboplatin (2, 4, 6 μg ml−1). The cytotoxic activity was evaluated by the sulphorhodamine B assay. The two most active drugs, docetaxel and gemcitabine, used singly and in association, were investigated as a function of treatment schedule. The sequence docetaxel→gemcitabine produced only a weak synergistic interaction in RAL but a strong synergism in CAEP cells. The synergistic interaction increased in both cell lines after a 48-h washout between the drug administrations. Flow cytometric analysis showed that in docetaxel→gemcitabine sequence, docetaxel produced a block in G2/M phase and, after 48 h, provided gemcitabine with a large fraction of recovered synchronized cells in the G1/S boundary, which is the specific target phase for gemcitabine. Conversely, simultaneous treatment induced an antagonistic effect in both cell lines, and the sequential scheme gemcitabine→docetaxel produced a weak synergistic effect only in RAL cells. Moreover, the synergistic interaction disappeared when washout periods of 24 or 48 h between two drug administrations were adopted. The synergistic activity of docetaxel→ 48-h washout→gemcitabine was confirmed in 11 of 14 primary cultures, which represents an important means of validating experimental results before translating them into clinical practice. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

Gemcitabine and Arabinosylcytosin Pharmacogenomics: Genome-Wide Association and Drug Response Biomarkers

Cancer patients show large individual variation in their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Gemcitabine (dFdC) and AraC, two cytidine analogues, have shown significant activity against a variety of tumors. We previously used expression data from a lymphoblastoid cell line-based model system to identify genes that might be important for the two drug cytotoxicity. In the present study, we used that same model system to perform a genome-wide association (GWA) study to test the hypothesis that common genetic variation might influence both gene expression and response to the two drugs. Specifically, genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and mRNA expression data were obtained using the Illumina 550K® HumanHap550 SNP Chip and Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip, respectively, for 174 ethnically-defined “Human Variation Panel” lymphoblastoid cell lines. Gemcitabine and AraC cytotoxicity assays were performed to obtain IC50 values for the cell lines. We then performed GWA studies with SNPs, gene expression and IC50 of these two drugs. This approach identified SNPs that were associated with gemcitabine or AraC IC50 values and with the expression regulation for 29 genes or 30 genes, respectively. One SNP in IQGAP2 (rs3797418) was significantly associated with variation in both the expression of multiple genes and gemcitabine and AraC IC50. A second SNP in TGM3 (rs6082527) was also significantly associated with multiple gene expression and gemcitabine IC50. To confirm the association results, we performed siRNA knock down of selected genes with expression that was associated with rs3797418 and rs6082527 in tumor cell and the knock down altered gemcitabine or AraC sensitivity, confirming our association study results. These results suggest that the application of GWA approaches using cell-based model systems, when combined with complementary functional validation, can provide insights into mechanisms responsible for variation in cytidine analogue response

Untangling knowledge creation and knowledge integration in enterprise wikis

A central challenge organizations face is how to build, store, and maintain knowledge over time. Enterprise wikis are community-based knowledge systems situated in an organizational context. These systems have the potential to play an important role in managing knowledge within organizations, but the motivating factors that drive individuals to contribute their knowledge to these systems is not very well understood. We theorize that enterprise wiki initiatives require two separate and distinct types of knowledge-sharing behaviors to succeed: knowledge creation (KC) and knowledge integration (KI). We examine a Wiki initiative at a major German bank to untangle the motivating factors behind KC and KI. Our results suggest KC and KI are indeed two distinct behaviors, reconcile inconsistent findings from past studies on the role of motivational factors for knowledge sharing to establish shared electronic knowledge resources in organizations, and identify factors that can be leveraged to tilt behaviors in favor of KC or KI

Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance

Stereotypes about Millennials, born between 1979 and 1994, depict them as self-centered, unmotivated, disrespectful, and disloyal, contributing to widespread concern about how communication with Millennials will affect organizations and how they will develop relationships with other organizational members. We review these purported characteristics, as well as Millennials’ more positive qualities—they work well in teams, are motivated to have an impact on their organizations, favor open and frequent communication with their supervisors, and are at ease with communication technologies. We discuss Millennials’ communicated values and expectations and their potential effect on coworkers, as well as how workplace interaction may change Millennials