2,929 research outputs found

    Semismall perturbations, semi-intrinsic ultracontractivity, and integral representations of nonnegative solutions for parabolic equations

    Get PDF
    We consider nonnegative solutions of a parabolic equation in a cylinder D \timesI, where DD is a noncompact domain of a Riemannian manifold and I=(0,T)I =(0,T) with 0<Tβ‰€βˆž0 < T \le \infty or I=(βˆ’βˆž,0)I=(-\infty,0). Under the assumption [SSP] (i.e., the constant function 1 is a semismall perturbation of the associated elliptic operator on DD), we establish an integral representation theorem of nonnegative solutions: In the case I=(0,T)I =(0,T), any nonnegative solution is represented uniquely by an integral on (DΓ—{0})βˆͺ(βˆ‚MDΓ—[0,T))(D \times \{0 \}) \cup (\partial_M D \times [0,T)), where βˆ‚MD\partial_M D is the Martin boundary of DD for the elliptic operator; and in the case I=(βˆ’βˆž,0)I=(-\infty,0), any nonnegative solution is represented uniquely by the sum of an integral on βˆ‚MDΓ—(βˆ’βˆž,0)\partial_M D \times (-\infty,0) and a constant multiple of a particular solution. We also show that [SSP] implies the condition [SIU] (i.e., the associated heat kernel is semi-intrinsically ultracontractive).Comment: 35 page

    On dynamical bit sequences

    Full text link
    Let X^{(k)}(t) = (X_1(t), ..., X_k(t)) denote a k-vector of i.i.d. random variables, each taking the values 1 or 0 with respective probabilities p and 1-p. As a process indexed by non-negative t, X(k)(t)X^{(k)}(t) is constructed--following Benjamini, Haggstrom, Peres, and Steif (2003)--so that it is strong Markov with invariant measure ((1-p)\delta_0+p\delta_1)^k. We derive sharp estimates for the probability that ``X_1(t)+...+X_k(t)=k-\ell for some t in F,'' where F \subset [0,1] is nonrandom and compact. We do this in two very different settings: (i) Where \ell is a constant; and (ii) Where \ell=k/2, k is even, and p=q=1/2. We prove that the probability is described by the Kolmogorov capacitance of F for case (i) and Howroyd's 1/2-dimensional box-dimension profiles for case (ii). We also present sample-path consequences, and a connection to capacities that answers a question of Benjamini et. al. (2003)Comment: 25 pages. This a substantial revision of an earlier paper. The material has been reorganized, and Theorem 1.3 is ne
    • …
    corecore