Effect of Meal Size and Test Duration on Gastric Emptying and Gastric Myoelectrical Activity as Determined with Simultaneous [13C]Octanoate Breath Test and Electrogastrography in Normal Subjects Using a Muffin Meal

Our purpose was to determine the effect of meal size on gastric emptying (GE) as measured by octanoate breath test (OBT), to determine the effect of the duration of breath collections on assessment of GE by OBT, and to determine the effect of meal size on gastric myoelectrical activity as measured by electrogastrography (EGG). Fourteen normal subjects underwent two modified [ 13 C]OBTs using muffin meals of 250 or 350 kcal mixed with 100 mg [ 13 C]sodium octanoate. T 1/2 for GE was determined for both the entire postprandial 6-hr breath collection and a truncated initial 4-hr data set. EGG was recorded for 30 min prior to the muffin meal and 4 hr postprandially. Using the 6-hr breath collection data, the T 1/2 was 177 ± 7 (mean ± sem) for the 350-kcal meal compared to 153 ± 7 min ( P < 0.01) for the 250-kcal meal. Using the 4-hr data, the T 1/2 for the 350-kcal meal was 244 ± 32 min compared to 165 ± 12 min ( P < 0.05) for the 250-kcal meal. The ratio of postprandial to fasting EGG power of the dominant frequency for the 350-kcal meal (1.9 ± 0.4) was higher than that for the 250-kcal meal (1.3 ± 0.6). T 1/2 for the 350-kcal meal using 4- and 6-hr data was significantly correlated with the 4-hr power ratio ( r = 0.68 and 0.67; P < 0.05, respectively), but poorly correlated for the 250-kcal meal. In conclusions, GE and EGG are affected by meal size. Using the muffin-based [ 13 C]OBT, T 1/2 for the 350-kcal meal was significantly longer than for a 250-kcal meal. Longer T 1/2 values were obtained with shorter breath sampling durations. The postprandial to fasting power ratio for the 350-kcal meal was greater than that for the 250-kcal meal.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44429/1/10620_2004_Article_364228.pd

Editorial: on the road towards treatment of gastroparesis—accelerating, but do we get closer? Authors' reply

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Kuo et al and Wuestenberghs & Gourcerol papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16344 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.1637

Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies

Disorders of gastrointestinal (GI) transit and motility are common, and cause either delayed or accelerated transit through the stomach, small intestine or colon, and affect one or more regions. Assessment of regional and/or whole gut transit times can provide direct measurements and diagnostic information to explain the cause of symptoms, and plan therapy.Recently, several newer diagnostic tools have become available. The American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies undertook this review to provide guidelines on the indications and optimal methods for the use of transit measurements in clinical practice. This was based on evidence of validation including performance characteristics, clinical significance, and strengths of various techniques. The tests include measurements of: gastric emptying with scintigraphy, wireless motility capsule, and 13 C breath tests; small bowel transit with breath tests, scintigraphy, and wireless motility capsule; and colonic transit with radioopaque markers, wireless motility capsule, and scintigraphy. Based on the evidence, consensus recommendations are provided for each technique and for the evaluations of regional and whole gut transit. In summary, tests of gastrointestinal transit are available and useful in the evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal dysmotility, since they can provide objective diagnosis and a rational approach to patient management.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79321/1/j.1365-2982.2010.01612.x.pd

Treatment of gastroparesis: a multidisciplinary clinical review

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75594/1/j.1365-2982.2006.00760.x.pd

Autonomic function in gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting: Relationship with etiology, gastric emptying, and symptom severity

BackgroundAutonomic dysfunction can be present in patients with idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis. The role of autonomic dysfunction relating to gastric emptying and upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) remains unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate autonomic function in patients with gastroparesis and CUNV with respect to etiology, gastric emptying and symptom severity.MethodsWe studied 242 patients with chronic gastroparetic symptoms recruited at eight centers. All patients had a gastric emptying scintigraphy within 6 months of the study. Symptom severity was assessed using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index. Autonomic function testing was performed at baseline enrollment using the ANX 3.0 autonomic monitoring system which measures heart rate variability and respiratory activity measurements.Key ResultsLow sympathetic response to challenge (Valsalva or standing) was the most common abnormality seen impacting 89% diabetic and 74% idiopathic patients. Diabetics compared to idiopathics, exhibited greater global hypofunction with sympathetic (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 2.2‐10.3; P < .001) and parasympathetic (OR = 7.2, 95% CI 3.4‐15.0; P < .001) dysfunction. Patients with delayed gastric emptying were more likely to have paradoxic parasympathetic excessive during sympathetic challenge [(Valsalva or standing) 40% vs. 26%, P = .05]. Patients with more severe symptoms exhibited greater parasympathetic dysfunction compared to those with mild‐moderate symptoms: resting sympathovagal balance [LFa/RFa 1.8 (1.0‐3.1) vs. 1.2 (0.6‐2.3), P = .006)] and standing parasympathetic activity [0.4 (0.1‐0.8) vs. 0.6 (0.2‐1.7); P = .03].ConclusionsAutonomic dysfunction was common in patients with gastroparesis and CUNV. Parasympathetic dysfunction was associated with delayed gastric emptying and more severe upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Conversely, sympathetic hypofunction was associated with milder symptoms.InferencesGastroparesis and CUNV may be a manifestation of GI autonomic dysfunction or imbalance, such that sympathetic dysfunction occurs early on in the manifestation of chronic upper GI symptoms, while parasympathetic dysfunction results in more severe symptoms and delayed gastric emptying.Sympathetic withdrawal (low sympathetic activity in response to a sympathetic challenge) was the most common autonomic abnormality found among all patients.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156243/2/nmo13810_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156243/1/nmo13810.pd

Satiety testing in diabetic gastroparesis: Effects of insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring on upper gastrointestinal symptoms and gastric myoelectrical activity

BackgroundSymptoms induced by caloric or nonâ caloric satiety test meals and gastric myoelectrical activity (GMA) have not been studied in patients with diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) before and after intense glucose management.AimsWe determined the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on GI symptoms, volume consumed, and GMA induced by the caloric meal satiety test (CMST) and water load satiety test (WLST) in DGP.MethodsFortyâ five patients with DGP underwent CMST and WLST at baseline and 24 weeks after CSII with CGM. Subjects ingested the test meals until they were completely full. Visual analog scales were used to quantify preâ and postmeal symptoms, and GMA was recorded with cutaneous electrodes and analyzed visually and by computer.Key ResultsAt baseline and 24â week visits, nausea, bloating, abdominal discomfort, and fullness were immediately increased after CMST and WLST (Ps < 0.01). The meal volumes ingested were significantly less than normal controls at both visits in almost oneâ third of the subjects. After the CMST, the percentage 3 cycle per minute GMA increased and bradygastria decreased compared with WLST (Ps < 0.05). After treatment for 24 weeks meal volumes ingested, postmeal symptoms and GMA were no different than baseline.Conclusions and inferences(a) Satiety test meals elicited symptoms of nausea, bloating, and abdominal discomfort; (b) CMST stimulated more symptoms and changes in GMA than WLST; and (c) CSII with CGM for 24 weeks did not improve symptoms, volumes ingested, or GMA elicited by the two satiety test meals in these patients with diabetic GP. Satiety tests in diabetic gastropresis are useful to study acute postprandial symptoms and GMA, but these measures were not improved by intensive insulin therapy.Water load and caloric load satiety tests immediately increase symptoms associated with gastroparesis. Normal 3 cpm gastric myoelctrical activity increased more after caloric load than water load tests. After 24 weeks of insulin therapy there were no differences in volumes ingested, symptoms or gastric myooelectrical activity.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152474/1/nmo13720_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/152474/2/nmo13720.pd

Transcriptomic signatures reveal immune dysregulation in human diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis

Abstract Background Cellular changes described in human gastroparesis have revealed a role for immune dysregulation, however, a mechanistic understanding of human gastroparesis and the signaling pathways involved are still unclear. Methods Diabetic gastroparetics, diabetic non-gastroparetic controls, idiopathic gastroparetics and non-diabetic non-gastroparetic controls underwent full-thickness gastric body biopsies. Deep RNA sequencing was performed and pathway analysis of differentially expressed transcripts was done using Ingenuity®. A subset of differentially expressed genes in diabetic gastroparesis was validated in a separate cohort using QT-PCR. Results 111 genes were differentially expressed in diabetic gastroparesis and 181 in idiopathic gastroparesis with a log2fold difference of | ≥ 2| and false detection rate (FDR) < 5%. Top canonical pathways in diabetic gastroparesis included genes involved with macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis pathway and differential regulation of cytokine production in macrophages and T helper cells by IL-17A and IL-17F. Top canonical pathways in idiopathic gastroparesis included genes involved in granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, and role of macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Sixty-five differentially expressed genes (log2fold difference | ≥ 2|, FDR < 5%) were common in both diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis with genes in the top 5 canonical pathways associated with immune signaling. 4/5 highly differentially expressed genes (SGK1, APOLD1, CXCR4, CXCL2, and FOS) in diabetic gastroparesis were validated in a separate cohort of patients using RT-PCR. Immune profile analysis revealed that genes associated with M1 (pro inflammatory) macrophages were enriched in tissues from idiopathic gastroparesis tissues compared to controls (p < 0.05). Conclusions Diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis have both unique and overlapping transcriptomic signatures. Innate immune signaling likely plays a central role in pathogenesis of human gastroparesis.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145193/1/12920_2018_Article_379.pd

Transcriptomic signatures reveal immune dysregulation in human diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis

Abstract Background Cellular changes described in human gastroparesis have revealed a role for immune dysregulation, however, a mechanistic understanding of human gastroparesis and the signaling pathways involved are still unclear. Methods Diabetic gastroparetics, diabetic non-gastroparetic controls, idiopathic gastroparetics and non-diabetic non-gastroparetic controls underwent full-thickness gastric body biopsies. Deep RNA sequencing was performed and pathway analysis of differentially expressed transcripts was done using Ingenuity®. A subset of differentially expressed genes in diabetic gastroparesis was validated in a separate cohort using QT-PCR. Results 111 genes were differentially expressed in diabetic gastroparesis and 181 in idiopathic gastroparesis with a log2fold difference of | ≥ 2| and false detection rate (FDR) < 5%. Top canonical pathways in diabetic gastroparesis included genes involved with macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis pathway and differential regulation of cytokine production in macrophages and T helper cells by IL-17A and IL-17F. Top canonical pathways in idiopathic gastroparesis included genes involved in granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, and role of macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Sixty-five differentially expressed genes (log2fold difference | ≥ 2|, FDR < 5%) were common in both diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis with genes in the top 5 canonical pathways associated with immune signaling. 4/5 highly differentially expressed genes (SGK1, APOLD1, CXCR4, CXCL2, and FOS) in diabetic gastroparesis were validated in a separate cohort of patients using RT-PCR. Immune profile analysis revealed that genes associated with M1 (pro inflammatory) macrophages were enriched in tissues from idiopathic gastroparesis tissues compared to controls (p < 0.05). Conclusions Diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis have both unique and overlapping transcriptomic signatures. Innate immune signaling likely plays a central role in pathogenesis of human gastroparesis.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145193/1/12920_2018_Article_379.pd

Role of Gastric Emptying in Symptoms of Gastroparesis

The symptoms of gastroparesis, such as nausea, vomiting, postprandial fullness, early satiety and abdominal pain, frequently impair the quality of life of the affected individuals. The diagnosis of gastroparesis is made after structural etiologies are ruled out and an assessment of gastric function shows delayed gastric emptying. The role of the delay in gastric emptying in the pathogenesis of symptoms of gastroparesis has been debated, with some studies suggesting an association between delayed gastric emptying and the upper gastrointestinal symptoms, while others do not. The recent literature supports the importance of using reliable methods to assess gastric emptying, as delay in gastric emptying measured on a reliable test (4-h scintigraphy or breath test) is associated with the severity of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition to measuring total gastric emptying, evaluation of regional gastric retention in the proximal and distal stomach and whole gut transit to assess small intestinal and colonic transit may provide additional useful information in patients with more generalized symptoms of gastrointestinal dysmotility