Evaluation of optimal medical therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients with prior stroke

Background: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with prior stroke is a common clinical dilemma. Currently, the application of optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its impact on clinical outcomes are not clear in this patient population. Methods: We retrieved 765 AMI patients with prior stroke who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization from the international multicenter BleeMACS registry. All of the subjects were divided into two groups based on the prescription they were given prior to discharge. Baseline characteristics and procedural variables were compared between the OMT and non-OMT groups. Mortality, re-AMI, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding were followed-up for 1 year. Results: Approximately 5% of all patients presenting with AMI were admitted to the hospital for ischemic stroke. Although the prescription rate of each OMT medication was reasonably high (73.3%-97.3%), 47.7% lacked at least one OMT medication. Patients receiving OMT showed a significantly decreased occurrence of mortality (4.5% vs 15.1%, p < 0.001), re-AMI (4.2% vs 9.3%, p = 0.004), and the composite endpoint of death/re-AMI (8.6% vs 20.5%, p < 0.001) compared to those without OMT. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding bleeding. After adjusting for confounding factors, OMT was the independent protective factor of 1-year mortality, while age was the independent risk factors. Conclusions: OMT at discharge was associated with a significantly lower 1-year mortality of patients with AMI and prior stroke in clinical practice. However, OMT was provided to just half of the eligible patients, leaving room for substantial improvement

Prediction of Post-Discharge Bleeding in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from the BleeMACS Registry

Background A poor ability of recommended risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding has been reported in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). No study assessed the prediction of post-discharge bleeding in the elderly. The new BleeMACS score (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome), was designed to predict post-discharge bleeding in ACS patients. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score in elderly patients. Methods We assessed the incidence and characteristics of severe bleeding after discharge in ACS patients aged ≥ 75 years. Bleeding was defined as any intracranial bleeding or bleeding leading to hospitalization and/or red blood transfusion, occurring within the first year after discharge. We assessed the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score according to age by Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression analysis, calculating receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curves (AUC). Results The BleeMACS registry included 15,401 patients of whom 3,376/15,401 (21.9%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more commonly treated with clopidogrel and less often treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Of 3,376 elderly patients, 190 (5.6%) experienced post-discharge bleeding. The incidence of bleeding was moderately higher in elderly patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.77). The predictive ability of the BleeMACS score was moderately lower in elderly patients (AUC, 0.652 vs. 0.691, p = 0.001). Conclusion Elderly patients with ACS had a significantly higher incidence of post-discharge bleeding. Despite a lower predictive ability in older patients, the BleeMACS score exhibited an acceptable performance in these patients

Association of Beta-Blockers with Survival on Patients Presenting with ACS Treated with PCI: A Propensity Score Analysis from the BleeMACS Registry

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate prognostic value of beta-blocker (BB) administration in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Methods and Results: The BleeMACS project is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry enrolling patients with ACS worldwide in 15 hospitals. Patients discharged with BB therapy were compared to those discharged without a BB before and after propensity score with matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital reinfarction, in-hospital heart failure, 1-year myocardial infarction, 1-year bleeding and 1-year composite of death and recurrent myocardial infarction. After matching, 2935 patients for each group were enrolled. The primary endpoint of 1-year death was significantly lower in the group on BB therapy (4.5 vs 7%, p < 0.05), while only a trend was noted for recurrent acute myocardial infarction (4.5 vs 4.9%, p = 0.54). These results were consistent for patients older than 80 years of age, for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and for those discharged with complete versus incomplete revascularization, but not for non-STEMI/unstable angina patients. Conclusions: BB therapy was related to 1-year lower risk of all-cause mortality, independently from completeness of revascularization, admission diagnosis, age and ejection fraction. Randomized controlled trials for patients treated with PCI for ACS should be performed

Average daily ischemic versus bleeding risk in patients with ACS undergoing PCI: Insights from the BleeMACS and RENAMI registries

Background: The risk of recurrent ischemia and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may vary during the first year of follow-up according to clinical presentation, and medical and interventional strategies. Methods: BleeMACS and RENAMI are 2 multicenter registries enrolling patients with ACS treated with PCI and clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The average daily ischemic and bleeding risks (ADIR and ADBR) in the first year after PCI were the primary end points. The difference between ADBR and ADIR was calculated to estimate the potential excess of bleeding/ischemic events in a given period or specific subgroup. Results: A total of 19,826 patients were included. Overall, in the first year after PCI, the ADBR was 0.008085%, whereas ADIR was 0.008017% (P =.886). In the first 2 weeks ADIR was higher than ADBR (P =.013), especially in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or incomplete revascularization. ADIR continued to be, albeit non-significantly, greater than ADBR up to the third month, whereas ADBR became higher, although not significantly, afterward. Patients with incomplete revascularization had an excess in ischemic risk (P =.003), whereas non–ST-segment elevation ACS patients and those on ticagrelor had an excess of bleeding (P =.012 and P =.022, respectively). Conclusions: In unselected ACS patients, ADIR and ADBR occurred at similar rates within 1 year after PCI. ADIR was greater than ADBR in the first 2 weeks, especially in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients and those with incomplete revascularization. In the first year, ADIR was higher than ADBR in patients with incomplete revascularization, whereas ADBR was higher in non–ST-segment elevation ACS patients and in those discharged on ticagrelor

Safety and efficacy of different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes stratified by the PRAISE risk score: a multi-center study

Aims: To establish the safety and efficacy of different dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combinations in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to their baseline ischemic and bleeding risk estimated with a machine learning (ML)-derived model (PRAISE score). Methods and results: Incidences of death, re-acute myocardial infarction (re-AMI) and BARC 3-5 bleeding with aspirin plus different P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel or potent P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor or prasugrel) were appraised among patients of the PRAISE dataset grouped in four sub-cohorts: low-to-moderate ischemic and bleeding risk; low-to-moderate ischemic risk and high bleeding risk; high ischemic risk and low-to-moderate bleeding risk; high ischemic and bleeding risk. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the outcome measures were derived with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. Among patients with low-to-moderate bleeding risk, clopidogrel was associated with higher rates of re-AMI in those at low-to-moderate ischemic risk (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16-2.51; p = 0.006) and increased risk of death (HR 3.2, 1.45-4.21; p = 0.003) and re-AMI (HR 2.23, 1.45-3.41; p<0.001) in those at high ischemic risk compared to prasugrel or ticagrelor, without difference in the risk of major bleeding. Among patients with high bleeding risk, clopidogrel showed comparable risk of death, re-AMI and major bleeding vs potent P2Y12 inhibitors, regardless of the baseline ischemic risk. Conclusions: Among ACS patients with non-high risk of bleeding, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with a lower risk or death and recurrent ischemic events, without bleeding excess. Patients deemed at high bleeding risk may instead be safely addressed to a less intensive DAPT strategy with clopidogrel

Antithrombotic Strategy in Secondary Prevention for High-Risk Patients with Previous Acute Coronary Syndrome: Overlap between the PEGASUS Eligibility and the COMPASS Eligibility in a Large Multicenter Registry

Background: Patients with previous acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of recurrent adverse cardiovascular events. Recently, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) have been shown to reduce recurrent ischemic events to the expense of an increase in bleeding events. The number of patients potentially eligible for these therapies in real life remains to be determined. Methods: Among ACS patients from five registries and one randomized controlled trial, we assessed the proportion of patients eligible for the PEGASUS strategy only and the proportion of patients eligible for the COMPASS strategy only, and set out the proportion of patients with an overlap between the strategies. Findings: Among the 10,048 evaluable patients, we found that 5373 (53.4%) were eligible for the PEGASUS strategy and 3841 (38.2%) were eligible for the COMPASS strategy, with a group of 3444 (34.4%) overlapping between the two strategies. The number of patients eligible for the PEGASUS strategy only was 1929 (19.2%) and the number eligible for the COMPASS strategy only was 397 (4.0%); 4278 (42.6%) were eligible for neither a PEGASUS strategy nor a COMPASS strategy. Interpretation: In a large cohort of ACS patients, one in three patients was eligible for either a prolonged DAPT with ticagrelor 60 mg and low-dose aspirin or a dual pathway inhibition approach with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg and low-dose aspirin

Impact of blood transfusion on in-hospital myocardial infarctions according to patterns of acute coronary syndrome: Insights from the BleeMACS registry

Blood transfusions (BTs) may worsen the prognosis of patients affected by acute coronary syndromes (ACS), although few data detail their impact on short-term events according to clinical presentation (ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, STEMI vs. Non-ST Segment Elevation ACS, NSTE-ACS). Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS, with data on BTs, were selected from the BleeMACS registry. The primary end point was the incidence of myocardial infarction during hospitalization (reAMI), the secondary end-points were 30-day mortality and the combined end-point of 30-day mortality and reAMI. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to clinical presentation (STEMI vs. NSTE-ACS). Overall, 13,975 patients were included: mean age was 64.1years, 10,651 (76.2%) were male and 7711 (55.2%) had STEMI. BTs were administered during hospitalization to 465 (3.3%) patients, who were older and presented a more relevant burden of risk factors. The primary end-point of reAMI occurred in 197 (1.4%) patients, of whom 102 (1.1%) with STEMI. After controlling for confounding variables, BTs independently predicted the primary end-point reAMI in patients admitted for STEMI (OR 4.059, 95% CI 2244-7.344) and not in those admitted for NSTE-ACS. Moreover, BTs independently related to 30-day mortality in STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients and to the composite of 30-day mortality and reAMI in STEMI patients. In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, BTs increase the risk of reAMI only in those admitted for STEMI, and not in those with NSTE-ACS. These results may help physicians to choose appropriate BT administration according to the admission diagnosi

Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Malignancy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: a BleeMACS Sub-Study

Objective Our objective was to define the most appropriate treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with malignancy. Methods and Results The BleeMACS project is a worldwide multicenter observational prospective registry in 16 hospitals enrolling patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary endpoints were death, re-infarction, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; composite of death and re-infarction) after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary endpoint was bleeding events during follow-up. We performed sub-study analyses according to whether beta-blockers (BBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), statins, or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were prescribed at discharge. We also calculated the propensity score for optimal medical therapy (OMT; combination of BB, ACEI/ARB, and statins). The study included 926 patients. According to the multivariate analysis, ACEIs/ARBs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.94; p = 0.03) and statins (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.23-0.61; p <0.01) reduced the risk of MACE, while the effects of BBs (HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.55-1.32; p = 0.48) and PPIs (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 0.83-2.12; p = 0.23) were not significant. OMT was prescribed at discharge in 300 (32.4 %) patients; after propensity score analysis, OMT showed a significant reduction in death (3 % vs. 12.5 %, HR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.1-0.4; log-rank p <0.001) and MACE (6.7 vs. 15.2 %, log-rank p = 0.01). Conclusion In patients with ACS and malignancy, OMT reduces the risk of adverse events at 1 year; in particular, ACEIs/ARBs and statins were the most protective drugs

Impacto del bloqueo del sistema renina-angiotensina en el pronóstico del síndrome coronario agudo en función de la fracción de eyección

Introduction and objectives: For patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is unclear whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are associated with reduced mortality, particularly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The goal of this study was to determine the association between ACEI/ARB and mortality in ACS patients undergoing PCI, with and without reduced LVEF. Methods: Data from the BleeMACS registry were used. The endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. The prognostic value of ACEI/ARB was tested after weighting by survival-time inverse probability and after adjustment by Cox regression, propensity score, and instrumental variable analysis. Results: Among 15 401 ACS patients who underwent PCI, ACEI/ARB were prescribed in 75.2%. There were 569 deaths (3.7%) during the first year after hospital discharge. After multivariable adjustment, ACEI/ARB were associated with lower 1-year mortality, ≤ 40% (HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43-0.90; P =.012). The relative risk reduction of ACEI/ARB in mortality was 46.1% in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, and 15.7% in patients with LVEF > 40% (P value for treatment-by-LVEF interaction =.008). For patients with LVEF > 40%, ACEI/ARB was associated with lower mortality only in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (HR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.21-0.93; P =.031). Conclusion: The benefit of ACEI/ARB in decreasing mortality after an ACS in patients undergoing PCI is concentrated in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, and in those with LVEF > 40% and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In non–ST-segment elevation-ACS patients with LVEF > 40%, further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of ACEI/ARB