Correlation coefficients (Spearman's rho) between criminological risk factors and scores on structured assessment instruments in relation to violent recidivism during the follow-up period.

<p>*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><p>**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p

Clinical risk factors and violent recidivism during the follow-up period.

<p>*All diagnoses in the table are based on the DSM-IV.</p

Basic descriptions concerning aspects of the follow-up period (months), violent criminal relapses, all criminal relapses, and psychiatric diagnoses at baseline for the total group, those in forensic psychiatric care, and those sentenced to prison.

<p>*Consisting of all violent reconvictions during the follow-up period (e.g. one murder, one arson, one case of exposing somebody to danger, two aggravated assaults, five assaults, three aggravated unlawful thefts/robberies, two cases of intimate partnership violence, and five violations of the legislation against carrying arms/knives in public places.</p><p>**Consisting of all reconvictions during the follow-up period (e.g. besides violent criminality also drug crimes, shoplifting, and traffic offences).</p

Logistic Regression Analyses of the Associations of ADHD at Age 9/12 and Seven Psychosocial Outcomes at Age 15.

<p>N = 293 (missing = 7), ADHD-cases compared to all other cases and controls (screen negative cotwins are not included).</p><p>Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets</p><p>* p<0.05</p><p>** p<0.01</p><p>*** p<0.001</p><p>^A Parental education = Educational level of parents (mother and father)</p><p>Logistic Regression Analyses of the Associations of ADHD at Age 9/12 and Seven Psychosocial Outcomes at Age 15.</p

Frequencies of subcategories of the outcome antisocial behavior (see Table 3, column 4) for screen-positive cases, screen-negative siblings, screen-negative controls, and the whole cohort at age 15.

<p><b>Baseline</b>: CATSS-9/12 study (N = screen-positive in A-TAC for “proxy” diagnosis); <b>Follow-up</b>: Five subcategories of Antisocial behavior in the clinical follow-up study, CATSS-15/DOGSS.</p><p>^A.<b>NDP</b> defined as ASD and/or ADHD and/or LD and/or TD and/or DCD, with a possible overlap of other mental health problems. NDP screen-positive: n = 198.</p><p>^B.<b>Other mental health problems</b> defined as OCD and/or ODD and/or CD and/or ED, with no NDP overlap. Screen-positive for other mental health problems: n = 49.</p><p>* Questions included in the <b>SDQ Conduct Problems Scale</b>: 1. Often has temper tantrums or hot tempers; 2. Generally obedient, usually does what told (reversed question); 3. Often fights with other children or bullies them; 4. Often lies or cheats; 5. Steals from home, school or elsewhere</p><p><b>SR</b> = self report; <b>PR</b> = parent report</p><p>Frequencies of subcategories of the outcome antisocial behavior (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0137475#pone.0137475.t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>, column 4) for screen-positive cases, screen-negative siblings, screen-negative controls, and the whole cohort at age 15.</p

Screen-positive cases according to A-TAC, screen-negative siblings, and random, screen-negative controls compared to the psychosocial outcomes at age 15.

<p>^A.<b>NDP</b> defined as ASD and/or ADHD and/or LD and/or TD and/or DCD, with a possible overlap of other mental health problems. NDP screen-positive: n = 198.</p><p>^B.<b>Other mental health problems</b> defined as OCD and/or ODD and/or CD and/or ED, with no NDP overlap. Screen-positive for other mental health problems: n = 49.</p><p><b><i>Baseline</i></b>: CATSS-9/12 study (n = screen-positive in A-TAC for “proxy” diagnosis). <b><i>Follow-up</i></b>: Psychosocial outcomes in the clinical follow-up study, CATSS-15/DOGSS.</p

Supplement_table_1 – Supplemental material for The Quantified Behavioral Test Failed to Differentiate ADHD in Adolescents With Neurodevelopmental Problems

<p>Supplemental material, Supplement_table_1 for The Quantified Behavioral Test Failed to Differentiate ADHD in Adolescents With Neurodevelopmental Problems by Viktoria Johansson, Eva Norén Selinus, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Sebastian Lundström, Natalie Durbeej, Henrik Anckarsäter, Paul Lichtenstein and Clara Hellner in Journal of Attention Disorders</p

Distribution of age 15 psychosocial outcomes in the whole cohort (n = 450).

<p>Note: SR = self report; PR = parent report</p><p>^A Missing = Adolescents or parents who didn’t give a complete form of self reported information at age 15</p><p>Distribution of age 15 psychosocial outcomes in the whole cohort (n = 450).</p

<i>Cronbach</i>'<i>s α</i> for the seven TCI dimensions in the CATSS-15, DOGSS, Brändström [3] and Garcia [29] study groups.

<p><i>Note</i>: ^▾Those 125 items identified from the 238-item TCI versions.</p

General study design of the Child and Adolescent Study in Sweden (CATSS).

<p>General study design of the Child and Adolescent Study in Sweden (CATSS).</p