42 research outputs found

    Predictors of non-pharmacological intervention in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:Value of neuroticism

    Get PDF
    Background: Non-pharmacological intervention is gaining increasing popularity in the treatment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We sought to investigate which factors play a role in the choice for non-pharmacological intervention with a particular focus on neuroticism. Methods: The study group comprised 73 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (mean age 55 13 years, 50 males). On average, patients had a 3-year-history of one symptomatic paroxysm per week lasting 2 It. The degree of neuroticism was assessed using the short scale Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Results: During a mean follow-up period of 7.0 +/- 0.6 years, 20 patients (27%) underwent a non-pharmacological intervention for atria] fibrillation including His bundle ablation (n=1), maze operation (n=4), DDDR-pacemaker (n=10), pulmonary vein ablation (n=5). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age <55 years (odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 1.1-24.5), frequency of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation > 1 per week (odds ratio 5.9, 95% CI 1.2-28.5) and total number of anti-arrhythmic drugs (class I and III) used > 2 (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.6-6.9) were predictive of non-pharmacological intervention (all p <0.05). In contrast, the degree of neuroticism was similar in patients who underwent non-pharmacological intervention as opposed to patients who did not undergo non-pharmacological intervention (4.5 +/- 3.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 2.9, p = NS). Conclusions: On the basis of this small study, neuroticism would not appear to play an important role in the decision to perform a nonpharmacological intervention. Instead, the data indicate that younger patients with pharmacologically refractory atrial fibrillation more often undergo non-pharmacological intervention. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

    Preoperative cardiac screening using NT-proBNP in obese patients 50 years and older undergoing bariatric surgery:a study of 310 consecutive patients

    Get PDF
    Background: Obesity is associated with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and diseases. Because bariatric surgery is increasingly performed in relatively elderly patients, a risk for pre- and postoperative CV complications exists. Objectives: We aimed to assess the value of plasma N-terminal-probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a CV screening tool. Setting: High-volume bariatric center. Methods: Between June 2019 and January 2020, all consecutive bariatric patients 50 years and older underwent preoperative NT-proBNP assessment in this cohort study to screen for CV disease. Patients with elevated NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/mL) were referred for further cardiac evaluation, including electrocardiography and echocardiography. Results: We included 310 consecutive patients (median age, 56 years; 79% female; body mass index = 43±6.5 kg/m2). A history of CV disease was present in 21% of patients, mainly atrial fibrillation (7%) and coronary artery disease (10%). A total of 72 patients (23%) had elevated NT-proBNP levels, and 67 of them underwent further cardiac workup. Of these 67 patients, electrocardiography (ECG) showed atrial fibrillation in 7 patients (10%). On echocardiography, 3 patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, 9 patients had LVEF 40%–49%, and 13 patients had LVEF ≥50% with structural and/or functional remodeling. In 2 patients, elevated NT-proBNP prompted workup leading to a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and consequent percutaneous coronary intervention in 1 patient. Conclusions: Elevated NT-proBNP levels are present in 23% of patients 50 years and older undergoing bariatric surgery. In 37% of them, there was echocardiographic evidence for structural and/or functional remodeling. Further studies are needed to assess if these preliminary results warrant routine application of NT-proBNP to identify patients at risk for CV complications after bariatric surgery

    Verapamil versus digoxin and acute versus routine serial cardioversion for the improvement of rhythm control for persistent atrial fibrillation

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesThe VERDICT (Verapamil Versus Digoxin and Acute Versus Routine Serial Cardioversion Trial) is a prospective, randomized study to investigate whether: 1) acutely repeated serial electrical cardioversions (ECVs) after a relapse of atrial fibrillation (AF); and 2) prevention of intracellular calcium overload by verapamil, decrease intractability of AF.BackgroundRhythm control is desirable in patients suffering from symptomatic AF.MethodsA total of 144 patients with persistent AF were included. Seventy-four (51%) patients were randomized to the acute(within 24 h) and 70 (49%) patients to the routineserial ECVs, and 74 (51%) patients to verapamil and 70 (49%) patients to digoxin for rate control before ECV and continued during follow-up (2 × 2 factorial design). Class III antiarrhythmic drugs were used after a relapse of AF. Follow-up was 18 months.ResultsAt baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups, except for beta-blocker use in the verapamil versus digoxin group (38% vs. 60%, respectively, p = 0.01). At follow-up, no difference in the occurrence of permanent AF between the acute and the routine cardioversion groups was observed (32% [95% confidence intervals (CI)] 22 to 44) vs. 31% [95% CI 21 to 44], respectively, p = NS), and also no difference between the verapamil- and the digoxin-randomized patients (28% [95% CI 19 to 40] vs. 36% [95% CI 25 to 48] respectively, p = NS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that lone digoxin use was the only significant predictor of failure of rhythm control treatment (hazard ratio 2.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.4], p = 0.02).ConclusionsAn acute serial cardioversion strategy does not improve long-term rhythm control in comparison with a routine serial cardioversion strategy. Furthermore, verapamil has no beneficial effect in a serial cardioversion strategy

    Women have less progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:data from the RACE V study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Sex differences in atrial fibrillation (AF) are observed in terms of comorbidities, symptoms, therapies received, AF progression and cardiovascular complications.METHODS: We assessed the differences in prevalence and the determinants of AF progression, as well as the clinical characteristics and quality of life (QoL), between women and men with paroxysmal AF included in the RACE V (Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction between hyperCoagulability, Electrical remodeling, and Vascular Destabilisation in the Progression of AF) study. At baseline, extensive phenotyping was done. To assess AF progression, implantable loop recorder (ILR) monitoring was used throughout follow-up. AF progression was defined as (1) progression to persistent or permanent AF or (2) progression of paroxysmal AF (&gt;3% burden increase).RESULTS: 417 patients were included, 179 (43%) of whom were women. Women were older (median 67 years vs 63 years, p&lt;0.001), less often had coronary artery disease (n=11 (6%) vs n=36 (16%), p=0.003), had more obesity (n=57 (32%) vs n=50 (21%), p=0.013), had less epicardial and pericardial fat (median 144 (interquartile range [IQR] 94-191) mL vs 199 (IQR 146-248) mL, p&lt;0.001; and median 89 (ICQ 61-121) mL vs 105 (IQR 83-133) mL, p&lt;0.001, respectively) and had more impaired left atrial function. The median follow-up was 2.2 (1.6-2.8) years. 51 of 417 patients (5.5% per year) showed AF progression (15/179 (8.4%) women and 36/238 (15.1%) men, p=0.032). Multivariable analysis showed tissue factor pathway inhibitor, N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and PR interval being associated with AF progression in women and factor XIIa:C1 esterase, NT-proBNP and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in men. QoL was not different between sexes.CONCLUSION: Despite older age, the incidence of AF progression was lower in women. Parameters associated with AF progression varied in part between sexes, suggesting different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.</p
    corecore