14 research outputs found

    Linear predictions of hookworm infection probabilities for population density, EVI, and latrine coverage.

    No full text
    <p>According to the site-specific models for Kyela and Itaka, adjusted for all variables shown in the site-specific models in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002408#pntd-0002408-t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>.</p

    Univariable associations of considered variables with hookworm infection<sup>*</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>CI = confidence interval; EVI = enhanced vegetation index; LST = land surface temperature; OR = odds ratio; SES = socio-economic status.</p>*<p>From separate logistic regression models which only include one covariate, adjusted for household clustering using robust variance estimates.</p

    Characteristics of study participants and environmental conditions at their places of residence in Kyela and Itaka site.

    No full text
    <p>IQR = inter-quartile range; EPG = eggs per gram of feces; EVI = enhanced vegetation index; LST = land surface temperature; N = number of observations; SES = socio-economic status.</p>*<p>Median for continuous and proportion in percent for binary variables; IQR, minimum and maximum values are not given for binary variables.</p>†<p>According to Montresor 1998 <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002408#pntd.0002408-Montresor1" target="_blank">[21]</a>.</p

    Multivariable associations of selected ecological and adjustment variables with hookworm infection status<sup>*</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>CI = confidence interval; EVI = enhanced vegetation index; LST = land surface temperature; OR = odds ratio; SES = socio-economic status.</p>*<p><a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002408#s3" target="_blank">Results</a> of logistic regression adjusted for within-household clustering with robust variance estimates with each model containing only those variables for which data are shown in the Table.</p>†<p>Performed on pooled dataset combining all nine sites.</p>‡<p>Moderated model for Kyela and Itaka sites with site-interaction terms for environmental variables.</p>§<p>Missing stratum not shown.</p

    Characteristics of the study participants and environmental conditions at their places of residence.

    No full text
    <p>EPG = eggs per gram of feces; EVI = enhanced vegetation index; IQR = inter-quartile range; LST = land surface temperature; N = number of observations; SES = socio-economic status.</p>*<p>Median for continuous and proportion in percent for binary variables; IQR, minimum and maximum values only shown for continuous variables.</p>†<p>According to Montresor, 1998 <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002408#pntd.0002408-Montresor1" target="_blank">[21]</a>.</p

    Multivariable association of environmental and socio-demographic factors with <i>A. lumbricoides</i> infection using logistic regression with fractional polynomials (n = 6,363).

    No full text
    <p>β =  beta coefficient; OR  =  odds ratio; 95% CI  =  confidence interval; LST  =  land surface temperature; EVI  =  enhanced vegetation index; SES  =  socio economic score, AIC  =  Akaike information criterion; BIC  =  Bayesian information criterion.</p>a)<p>Adjusted for household clustering using Huber/White/Sandwich variance estimates and for study sites.</p>b)<p>Fractional polynomial transformation with two degrees and powers p = 3: β<sub>1</sub>x<sup>p</sup>+β<sub>2</sub>x<sup>p</sup>*ln x.</p>c)<p>Fractional polynomial transformation with two degrees and powers p = −0.5: β<sub>1</sub>x<sup>p</sup>+β<sub>2</sub>x<sup>p</sup>*ln x.</p>d)<p>Percentage of households with a latrine within one kilometer around the participant's household.</p

    Description of variables.

    No full text
    <p>N =  number of observations; Std. Dev.  =  standard deviation; EPG  =  eggs per gram of feces; LST  =  land surface temperature; EVI  =  enhanced vegetation index; SES  =  socio-economic score.</p>a)<p>Mean for continuous and % for categorical variables.</p>b)<p>According to Montresor, 1998 <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0092032#pone.0092032-Montresor1" target="_blank">[35]</a>.</p>c)<p>Percentage of households with a latrine within one kilometer around the participant's household.</p
    corecore