Additional file 2: of Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention

Links between presented themes and NPT components. (DOCX 16 kb

Summary of regression analyses of changes in outcomes: Self-management outcomes.

<p>*p< = 0.05;</p><p>**p<0.01;</p><p>***p< = 0.001.</p>$<p>Statistically significant (p<0.05) under sensitivity analysis.</p>1<p>Variables with no significant relationships to any outcome are not shown.</p><p>Model 1 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographic variables.</p><p>Model 2 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographics and disease burden.</p><p>Model 3 = network characteristics controlled for demographics, disease burden and one-another.</p

Additional file 1: of The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence

Qualitative Quality Table. Quality scores related to the included qualitative studies. (DOCX 18 kb

Descriptive statistics of the sample.

1<p>Used as a continuous variable in regression analysis.</p

Summary of regression analyses of changes in outcomes: Health status outcomes.

<p>*p< = 0.05;</p><p>**p<0.01;</p><p>***p< = 0.001.</p>$<p>Statistically significant (p<0.05) under sensitivity analysis.</p>1<p>Variables with no significant relationships to any outcome are not shown.</p><p>Model 1 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographic variables.</p><p>Model 2 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographics and disease burden.</p><p>Model 3 = network characteristics controlled for demographics, disease burden and one-another.</p

Modelled relationships (mean score and 95% confidence interval) between health behaviour and illness work done by the network, and emotional well-being and illness work done by the network, controlled for patient sociodemographics, disease burden and other significant social network characteristics (Model 3).

<p>Modelled relationships (mean score and 95% confidence interval) between health behaviour and illness work done by the network, and emotional well-being and illness work done by the network, controlled for patient sociodemographics, disease burden and other significant social network characteristics (Model 3).</p

Summary of regression analyses of outcomes at Time 1: Self-management outcomes.

<p>*p< = 0.05;</p><p>**p<0.01;</p><p>***p< = 0.001.</p>1<p>Variables with no significant relationships to any outcome are not shown.</p><p>Model 1 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographic variables.</p><p>Model 2 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographics and disease burden.</p><p>Model 3 = network characteristics controlled for demographics, disease burden and one-another.</p

Summary of regression analyses of outcomes at Time 1: Health status outcomes.

<p>*p< = 0.05;</p><p>**p<0.01;</p><p>***p< = 0.001.</p>1<p>Variables with no significant relationships to any outcome are not shown.</p><p>Model 1 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographic variables.</p><p>Model 2 = individual network characteristics controlled for patient demographics and disease burden.</p><p>Model 3 = network characteristics controlled for demographics, disease burden and one-another.</p

Multivariate analysis of work done by network members: Ego, member and network characteristics combined.

<p>Multivariate analysis of work done by network members: Ego, member and network characteristics combined.</p

Mean network-level work scores by relationship type for networks with and without a partner/spouse.

<p>The figure compares partner and no-partner networks. The figure represents visually the differences between the mean levels for illness, emotional and everyday work and in relation to type of relationship.</p