Enterococcal colonization of infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: associated predictors, risk factors and seasonal patterns

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During and shortly after birth, newborn infants are colonized with enterococci. This study analyzes predictors for early enterococcal colonization of infants in a neonatal intensive care unit and describes risk factors associated with multidrugresistant enterococci colonization and its seasonal patterns.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Over a 12-month period, we performed a prospective epidemiological study in 274 infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. On the first day of life, we compared infants with enterococcal isolates detected in meconium or body cultures to those without. We then tested the association of enterococcal colonization with peripartal predictors/risk factors by using bivariate and multivariate statistical methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Twenty-three percent of the infants were colonized with enterococci. The three most common enterococcal species were <it>E. faecium </it>(48% of isolates), <it>E. casseliflavus </it>(25%) and <it>E. faecalis </it>(13%). Fifty-seven percent of the enterococci found were resistant to three of five antibiotic classes, but no vancomycin-resistant isolates were observed. During winter/spring months, the number of enterococci and multidrug-resistant enterococci were higher than in summer/fall months (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). With respect to enterococcal colonization on the first day of life, predictors were prematurity (p = 0.043) and low birth weight (p = 0.011). With respect to colonization with multidrug-resistant enterococci, risk factors were prematurity (p = 0.0006), low birth weight (p < 0.0001) and prepartal antibiotic treatment (p = 0.019). Using logistic regression, we determined that gestational age was the only parameter significantly correlated with multidrug-resistant enterococci colonization. No infection with enterococci or multidrugresistant enterococci in the infants was detected. The outcome of infants with and without enterococcal colonization was the same with respect to death, necrotizing enterocolitis, intracerebral hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In neonatal intensive care units, an infant's susceptibility to early colonization with enterococci in general, and his or her risk for colonization with multidrug-resistant enterococci in particular, is increased in preterm newborns, especially during the winter/spring months. The prepartal use of antibiotics with no known activity against enterococci appears to increase the risk for colonization with multidrug-resistant enterococci.</p

Comparison of birth weights of infants either colonized or not colonized with (A) enterococci and (B) multidrug-resistant enterococci in meconium or surveillance cultures

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Enterococcal colonization of infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: associated predictors, risk factors and seasonal patterns"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/107</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2007;7():107-107.</p><p>Published online 16 Sep 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2077867.</p><p></p> Boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile, with a line at the median (50th percentile) and whiskers show the highest and the lowest birth weights. The p values refer to the comparison of the median values using the Mann Whitney test

Comparison of gestational age of infants either colonized or not colonized with (A) enterococci and (B) multidrug-resistant enterococci in meconium or surveillance cultures

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Enterococcal colonization of infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: associated predictors, risk factors and seasonal patterns"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/107</p><p>BMC Infectious Diseases 2007;7():107-107.</p><p>Published online 16 Sep 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2077867.</p><p></p> Boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile, with a line at the median (50th percentile) and whiskers show the highest and the lowest gestational ages. The p values refer to the comparison of the median values using the Mann Whitney test

Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Nummer 032/034-OL, April 2018) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer

The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). Purpose The use of evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patient's quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy where required. The evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve survival rates and the quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers. Methods The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources include reviews of evidence which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one area of the guideline. The identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method with consent being reached online. The guideline report is freely available online. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and hereditary factors, The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endomentrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer including the pathology of the cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer