Surgical fixation with K-wires versus casting in adults with fracture of distal radius: DRAFFT2 multicentre randomised clinical trial

Objective To assess wrist function, quality of life, and complications in adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius, treated with either a moulded cast or surgical fixation with K-wires. Design Multicentre randomised clinical superiority trial, Setting 36 hospitals in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Participants 500 adults aged 16 or over with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius, randomised after manipulation of their fracture (255 to moulded cast; 245 to surgical fixation). Interventions Manipulation and moulded cast was compared with manipulation and surgical fixation with K-wires plus cast. Details of the application of the cast and the insertion of the K-wires were at the discretion of the treating surgeon, according to their normal clinical practice. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score at 12 months (five questions about pain and 10 about function and disability; overall score out of 100 (best score=0 and worst score=100)). Secondary outcomes were PRWE score at three and six months, quality of life, and complications, including the need for surgery due to loss of fracture position in the first six weeks. Results The mean age of participants was 60 years and 417 (83%) were women; 395 (79%) completed follow-up. No statistically significant difference in the PRWE score was seen at 12 months (cast group (n=200), mean 21.2 (SD 23.1); K-wire group (n=195), mean 20.7 (22.3); adjusted mean difference −0.34 (95% confidence interval −4.33 to 3.66), P=0.87). No difference was seen at earlier time points. In the cast group, 33 (13%) of participants needed surgical fixation for loss of fracture position in the first six weeks compared with one revision surgery in the K-wire group (odds ratio 0.02, 95% confidence interval 0.001 to 0.10). Conclusions Among patients with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture that needed manipulation, surgical fixation with K-wires did not improve patients’ wrist function at 12 months compared with a cast. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN1198054

Sex differences in the diagnosis of advanced cancer and subsequent outcome in people with chronic kidney disease: an analysis of a national population cohort

Background: In the general population, advanced cancer stage at presentation is associated with poorer health outcomes. People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have increased incidence and mortality from most cancer types. We sought to determine whether people with CKD were more likely to present with advanced stage cancer, whether this was associated with survival, and whether these associations varied by sex. Methods: Data were from Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL), a Welsh primary care database with linkage to cancer and death registries. We included patients with a de- novo cancer diagnosis (2011-2017), and at least two kidney function tests in the two years prior to diagnosis. Estimated glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr) was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2009 equation (mL/min/1.73m2). Logistic regression models determined odds of presenting with advanced cancer (stage 3 or 4 at diagnosis) by different values of eGFRcr at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models tested associations between eGFRcr at baseline and all-cause mortality risk (reference eGFR 75 to <90). Findings: There were 66,128 patients: 30,857 (46.7%) were female, mean age was 69.1 (standard deviation [SD] 13.8) years in females and 70.6 (SD 11.1) years in males; median eGFRcr at baseline was 78 (interquartile range [IQR] 63 – 90) mL/min/1.73m2 in both females and males. Over a median follow-up time of 3.1 (IQR 0.5 – 5.7) years in females and 2.9 (IQR 0.5-5.5) years in males, there were 17,303 deaths in females and 20,855 in males. An eGFRcr <30 was associated with higher odds of presenting with advanced cancer in males (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.09-1.62), but not in females (OR 1.17 95% CI 0.92-1.50); positive associations were primarily driven by prostate and breast cancers. With lower eGFRcr, hazards of cancer death increased in both sexes, but lower eGFRcr was associated with greater hazards of cancer death in females (eGFRcr <30: HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.88, p<0.001; male versus female comparison HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.90; p=0.037). Interpretation: CKD was not associated with substantially higher odds of presenting with advanced cancer across most cancer sites (except prostate and breast), but was associated with reduced survival. Despite an initial survival advantage compared to males, females with CKD had disproportionately higher hazards of death. Though potential explanations for reduced survival after a cancer diagnosis are manifold, scrutiny of access to, efficacy, and safety of cancer treatments in people with CKD – particularly females with CKD – are warranted