Caddis flies

RESP-622

Lacewings

RESP-693

The defence of aphids against predators and parasites

RESP-601

Abundance of Aphids and some Insects,that prey on them in Suffolk, as shown catches on Sticky Traps

RESP-640

Coccinellid beetles on the East Coast

RESP-654

Thee beet leaf bug in East Anglia

RESP-659

Computing Bayes Factors for Evidence-Accumulation Models Using Warp-III Bridge Sampling

Over the last decade, the Bayesian estimation of evidence-accumulation models has gainedpopularity, largely due to the advantages afforded by the Bayesian hierarchical framework.Despite recent advances in the Bayesian estimation of evidence-accumulation models,model comparison continues to rely on suboptimal procedures, such as posterior parameterinference and model selection criteria known to favor overly complex models. In this paperwe advocate model comparison for evidence-accumulation models based on the Bayesfactor obtained via Warp-III bridge sampling. We demonstrate, using the Linear BallisticAccumulator (LBA), that Warp-III sampling provides a powerful and flexible approachthat can be applied to both nested and non-nested model comparisons, even in complexand high-dimensional hierarchical instantiations of the LBA. We provide an easy-to-usesoftware implementation of the Warp-III sampler and outline a series of recommendationsaimed at facilitating the use of Warp-III sampling in practical applications

A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm

Response inhibition is frequently investigated using the stop-signal paradigm, where participants perform a two-choice response time task that is occasionally interrupted by a stop signal instructing them to withhold their response. Stop-signal performance is formalized as a race between a go and a stop process. If the go process wins, the response is executed; if the stop process wins, the response is inhibited. Successful inhibition requires fast stop responses and a high probability of triggering the stop process. Existing methods allow for the estimation of the latency of the stop response, but are unable to identify deficiencies in triggering the stop process. We introduce a Bayesian model that addresses this limitation and enables researchers to simultaneously estimate the probability of trigger failures and the entire distribution of stopping latencies. We demonstrate that trigger failures are clearly present in two previous studies, and that ignoring them distorts estimates of stopping latencies. The parameter estimation routine is implemented in the BEESTS software (Matzke et al., Front. Quantitative Psych. Measurement, 4, 918; 2013a) and is available at http://dora.erbe-matzke.com/software.html