Activity of ribonucleotide reductase helps determine how cells repair DNA double strand breaks

Mammalian cells can choose either nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) for repair of chromosome breaks. Of these two pathways, HR alone requires extensive DNA synthesis and thus abundant synthesis precursors (dNTPs). We address here if this differing requirement for dNTPs helps determine how cells choose a repair pathway. Cellular dNTP pools are regulated primarily by changes in ribonucleotide reductase activity. We show that an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase (hydroxyurea) hypersensitizes NHEJ-deficient cells, but not wild type or HR-deficient cells, to chromosome breaks introduced by ionizing radiation. Hydroxyurea additionally reduces the frequency of irradiated cells with a marker for an early step in HR, Rad51 foci, consistent with reduced initiation of HR under these conditions. Conversely, promotion of ribonucleotide reductase activity protects NHEJ-deficient cells from ionizing radiation. Importantly, promotion of ribonucleotide reductase activity also increases usage of HR in cells proficient in both NHEJ and HR at a targeted chromosome break. Activity of ribonucleotide reductase is thus an important factor in determining how mammalian cells repair broken chromosomes. This may explain in part why G1/G0 cells, which have reduced ribonucleotide reductase activity, rely more on NHEJ for DSB repair

Ku is a 5′-dRP/AP lyase that excises nucleotide damage near broken ends

Mammalian cells require Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for efficient repair of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks1. A key feature of biological sources of strand breaks is associated nucleotide damage, including base loss (abasic or AP sites)2. At single strand breaks, 5' terminal abasic sites are excised by pol β's 5'dRP lyase activity3,4,5,6: we show here in vitro and in cells that accurate and efficient repair by NHEJ of double-strand breaks with such damage similarly requires 5'dRP/AP lyase activity (Figure 1a). Classically defined NHEJ is moreover uniquely effective at coupling this end-cleaning step to joining in cells, helping distinguish this pathway from otherwise robust alternate NHEJ pathways. Surprisingly, the NHEJ factor Ku can be identified as an effective 5'dRP/AP lyase. Similar to other lyases7, Ku nicks DNA 3' of an abasic site by a mechanism involving a Schiff base covalent intermediate with the abasic site. We demonstrate using cell extracts that Ku is essential for efficient removal of AP sites near double-strand breaks and, consistent with this result, joining of such breaks is specifically reduced in cells complemented with a lyase-attenuated Ku mutant. Ku had previously been presumed only to recognize ends and recruit other factors that processed ends; our data supports an unexpected direct role for Ku in end processing steps as well

A comparison of BRCT domains involved in nonhomologous end-joining: Introducing the solution structure of the BRCT domain of polymerase lambda

Three of the four family X polymerases, DNA polymerase λ, DNA polymerase µ, and TdT have been associated with repair of double-strand DNA breaks by nonhomologous end-joining. Their involvement in this DNA repair process requires an N-terminal BRCT domain that mediates interaction with other protein factors required for recognition and binding of broken DNA ends. Here we present the NMR solution structure of the BRCT domain of DNA polymerase λ, completing the structural portrait for this family of enzymes. Analysis of the overall fold of the polymerase λ BRCT domain reveals structural similarity to the BRCT domains of polymerase µ and TdT, yet highlights some key sequence and structural differences that may account for important differences in the biological activities of these enzymes and their roles in nonhomologous end-joining. Mutagenesis studies indicate that the conserved Arg57 residue of Pol λ plays a more critical role for binding to the XRCC4-Ligase IV complex than its structural homolog in Pol µ, Arg43. In contrast, the hydrophobic Leu60 residue of Pol λ contributes less significantly to binding than the structurally homologous Phe46 residue of Pol µ. A third leucine residue involved in the binding and activity of Pol µ, is nonconservatively replaced by a glutamine in Pol λ (Gln64) and, based on binding and activity data, is apparently unimportant for Pol λ interactions with the NHEJ complex. In conclusion, both the structure of the Pol λ BRCT domain and its mode of interaction with the other components of the NHEJ complex significantly differ from the two previously studied homologs, Pol µ and TdT

Template strand scrunching during DNA gap repair synthesis by human polymerase λ

Family X polymerases such as DNA polymerase (Pol ) are well suited for filling short gaps during DNA repair because they simultaneously bind both the 5' and 3' ends of short gaps. DNA binding and gap filling are well characterized for 1-nucleotide (nt) gaps, but the location of yet-to-be-copied template nucleotides in longer gaps is unknown. Here we present crystal structures revealing that, when bound to a 2-nt gap, Pol scrunches the template strand and binds the additional uncopied template base in an extrahelical position within a binding pocket that comprises three conserved amino acids. Replacing these amino acids with alanine results in less processive gap filling and less efficient NHEJ when 2-nt gaps are involved. Thus, akin to scrunching by RNA polymerase during transcription initiation, scrunching occurs during gap filling DNA synthesis associated with DNA repair

End-bridging is required for pol μ to efficiently promote repair of noncomplementary ends by nonhomologous end joining

DNA polymerase μ is a member of the mammalian pol X family and reduces deletion during chromosome break repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). This biological role is linked to pol μ's ability to promote NHEJ of ends with noncomplementary 3′ overhangs, but questions remain regarding how it performs this role. We show here that synthesis by pol μ in this context is often rapid and, despite the absence of primer/template base-pairing, instructed by template. However, pol μ is both much less active and more prone to possible template independence in some contexts, including ends with overhangs longer than two nucleotides. Reduced activity on longer overhangs implies pol μ is less able to synthesize across longer gaps, arguing pol μ must bridge both sides of gaps between noncomplementary ends to be effective in NHEJ. Consistent with this argument, a pol μ mutant defective specifically on gapped substrates is also less active during NHEJ of noncomplementary ends both in vitro and in cells. Taken together, pol μ activity during NHEJ of noncomplementary ends can thus be primarily linked to pol μ's ability to work together with core NHEJ factors to bridge DNA ends and perform a template-dependent gap fill-in reaction

Solution Structure of Polymerase μ's BRCT Domain Reveals an Element Essential for Its Role in Nonhomologous End Joining †

The solution structure and dynamics of the BRCT domain from human DNA polymerase μ, implicated in repair of chromosome breaks by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), has been determined using NMR methods. BRCT domains are typically involved in protein—protein interactions between factors required for the cellular response to DNA damage. The pol μ BRCT domain is atypical in that, unlike other reported BRCT structures, the pol μ BRCT is neither part of a tandem grouping, nor does it appear to form stable homodimers. Although the sequence of the pol μ BRCT domain has some unique characteristics, particularly the presence of > 10% proline residues, it forms the characteristic αβα sandwich, in which three alpha helices are arrayed around a central four-stranded β-sheet. The structure of helix α1 is characterized by two solvent-exposed hydrophobic residues, F46 and L50, suggesting that this element may play a role in mediating interactions of pol μ with other proteins. Consistent with this argument, mutation of these residues, as well as the proximal, conserved residue R43, specifically blocked the ability of pol μ to efficiently work together with NHEJ factors Ku and XRCC4-ligase IV to join noncomplementary ends together in vitro. The structural, dynamic, and biochemical evidence reported here identifies a functional surface in the pol μ BRCT domain critical for promoting assembly and activity of the NHEJ machinery. Further, the similarity between the interaction regions of the BRCT domains of pol μ and TdT support the conclusion that they participate in NHEJ as alternate polymerases

A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining

Three Pol X family members have been linked to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) in mammals. Template-independent TdT promotes diversity during NHEJ-dependent repair of V(D)J recombination intermediates, but the roles of the template-dependent polymerases μ and λ in NHEJ remain unclear. We show here that pol μ and pol λ are similarly recruited by NHEJ factors to fill gaps when ends have partially complementary overhangs, suggesting equivalent roles promoting accuracy in NHEJ. However, only pol μ promotes accuracy during immunoglobulin kappa recombination. This distinctive in vivo role correlates with the TdT-like ability of pol μ, but not pol λ, to act when primer termini lack complementary bases in the template strand. However, unlike TdT, synthesis by pol μ in this context is primarily instructed by a template from another DNA molecule. This apparent gradient of template dependence is largely attributable to a small structural element that is present but different in all three polymerases.This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA097096 to D.A.R. and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to S.A.N.