Considerable doubt about rubella screening and vaccination among unvaccinated orthodox protestant women: a mixed-methods study

BackgroundWomen who are susceptible to rubella are advised to vaccinate against rubella to prevent infection in future pregnancies, and thus avert the risk of congenital rubella syndrome in their unborn child. Rubella outbreaks periodically occur in the under-vaccinated orthodox Protestant community in the Netherlands. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to determine and understand personal experience with rubella, perceived rubella susceptibility, and intention to accept rubella screening and vaccination among unvaccinated orthodox Protestant women. The ultimate aim of this study was to inform policy and practice and contribute to the prevention of cases of congenital rubella syndrome.MethodsA mixed-methods study was conducted combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews among unvaccinated Dutch orthodox Protestant women aged 18-40 years. Descriptive analysis was used for quantitative data. Qualitative data was analysed using codes and categories.ResultsResults of the survey (167 participants) showed that most participants had personal experience with rubella (74%, 123/167) and 101 women (61%, 101/167) indicated they had had rubella themselves. More than half of the women were undecided whether to accept rubella susceptibility screening (56%; 87/156) or rubella vaccination (55%; 80/146). Qualitative findings (10 participants) showed that most women thought they were not susceptible to rubella. Indecisiveness and negative attitudes to accept rubella vaccination were related with religious arguments to object vaccination and with women's perception of absence of imminent threat of rubella. Furthermore, results showed presence of misconceptions among women in the interpretation of their susceptibility and high confidence in their parents' memory that they had experienced rubella as a child although no laboratory screening had been conducted.ConclusionsIn light of an imminent rubella outbreak in the Netherlands, a tailored education campaign should be prepared aimed at and established in cooperation with the under-vaccinated orthodox Protestant community. Health care providers should provide adequate information on rubella and support decision-making in order to stimulate women to make a deliberate and informed decision on rubella screening and, if necessary, subsequent vaccination

Explaining the long-term impact of chronic Q fever and Q fever fatigue syndrome on psychosocial functioning: A comparison with diabetes and the general population

OBJECTIVE: After Q fever infection, 1-5% of patients develop chronic Q fever, while about 20% develops Q fever fatigue syndrome (QFS). This study examines whether these two conditions have a long-term impact on psychosocial functioning compared to the general population and patients with type 2 diabetes (DM) and investigate which mediating factors influence outcomes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was performed, measuring psychosocial functioning including quality of life (depression and satisfaction with life), anxiety, social functioning and relationship satisfaction in patients with proven or probable chronic Q fever or QFS, 5-9 years after acute Q fever infection. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyse differences between groups, correct for confounders and identify relevant mediators (fatigue, physical or cognitive functioning, illness perception). RESULTS: Quality of life and social functioning of chronic Q-fever and QFS patients was significantly lower and anxiety significantly higher compared to DM patients and the general population. The impact was completely mediated by fatigue in both Q fever groups. Physical and cognitive functioning and illness perception partially mediated the impact. CONCLUSIONS: Health care workers need to be aware of the long-term impact of chronic Q fever and QFS on psychosocial functioning of patients in order to provide proper guidance