Development of a Series of Kynurenine 3-Monooxygenase Inhibitors Leading to a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis

Recently, we reported a novel role for KMO in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP). A number of inhibitors of kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO) have previously been described as potential treatments for neurodegenerative conditions and particularly for Huntington’s disease. However, the inhibitors reported to date have insufficient aqueous solubility relative to their cellular potency to be compatible with the intravenous (iv) dosing route required in AP. We have identified and optimized a novel series of high affinity KMO inhibitors with favorable physicochemical properties. The leading example is exquisitely selective, has low clearance in two species, prevents lung and kidney damage in a rat model of acute pancreatitis, and is progressing into preclinical development

Kynurenine–3–monooxygenase inhibition prevents multiple organ failure in rodent models of acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common and devastating inflammatory condition of the pancreas that is considered to be a paradigm of sterile inflammation leading to systemic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death1,2 Acute mortality from AP-MODS exceeds 20%3 and for those who survive the initial episode, their lifespan is typically shorter than the general population4. There are no specific therapies available that protect individuals against AP-MODS. Here, we show that kynurenine-3-monooxygenase (KMO), a key enzyme of tryptophan metabolism5, is central to the pathogenesis of AP-MODS. We created a mouse strain deficient for Kmo with a robust biochemical phenotype that protected against extrapancreatic tissue injury to lung, kidney and liver in experimental AP-MODS. A medicinal chemistry strategy based on modifications of the kynurenine substrate led to the discovery of GSK180 as a potent and specific inhibitor of KMO. The binding mode of the inhibitor in the active site was confirmed by X-ray co-crystallography at 3.2 Å resolution. Treatment with GSK180 resulted in rapid changes in levels of kynurenine pathway metabolites in vivo and afforded therapeutic protection against AP-MODS in a rat model of AP. Our findings establish KMO inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy in the treatment of AP-MODS and open up a new area for drug discovery in critical illness

Selectivity of d[Cha(4)]AVP and SSR149415 at human vasopressin and oxytocin receptors: evidence that SSR149415 is a mixed vasopressin V(1b)/oxytocin receptor antagonist

1. A possible role of arginine vasopressin (AVP) V(1b) receptor subtype in stress-related disorders has been recently highlighted by the discovery of the agonist [1-deamino-4-cyclohexylalanine] AVP (d[Cha(4)]AVP) and the antagonist SSR149415. Both compounds have been proposed to target specifically V(1b) receptors, since the reported affinities for the related V(1a), V(2) and oxytocin receptors are in the micromolar or submicromolar range. In the present study, we further investigated the binding affinities of d[Cha(4)]AVP and SSR149415 at recombinant human vasopressin V(1b) (hV(1b)) and oxytocin (hOT) receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and functional properties of both compounds at hV(1b), hV(1a), hV(2) and hOT receptors. 2. d[Cha(4)]AVP bound to hV(1b) receptors and hOT receptors with pK(i) values of 9.68±0.06 and 7.68±0.09, respectively. SSR149415 showed pK(i) values of 9.34±0.06 at hV(1b) and 8.82±0.16 at hOT receptors. 3. d[Cha(4)]AVP stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) increase in hV(1b)-CHO cells with a pEC(50) value of 10.05±0.15. It showed pEC(50) values of 6.53±0.17 and 5.92±0.02 at hV(1a) and hV(2) receptors, respectively, and behaved as a weak antagonist at hOT receptors (pK(B)=6.31±0.12). SSR149415 inhibited the agonist-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase with pK(B) values of 9.19±0.07 in hV(1b)-CHO and 8.72±0.15 in hOT-CHO cells. A functional pK(i) value of 7.23±0.10 was found for SSR1494151 at hV(1a) receptors, whereas it did not inhibit 20 nM AVP response at hV(2) receptors up to 3 μM. 4. Data obtained confirmed the high potency and selectivity of d[Cha(4)]AVP at hV(1b) receptors, but revealed that SSR149415, in addition to the high potency at hV(1b) receptors, displays a significant antagonism at hOT receptors

Pharmacology of GPR55 in yeast and identification of GSK494581A as a mixedactivity glycine transporter subtype 1 inhibitor and GPR55

ABSTRACT GPR55 is a G protein-coupled receptor activated by L-␣-lysophosphatidylinositol and suggested to have roles in pain signaling, bone morphogenesis, and possibly in vascular endothelial cells. It has affinity for certain cannabinoids (molecules that interact with the cannabinoid CB 1 and CB 2 receptors), but investigation of its functional role in cell-based systems and in tissue has been limited by a lack of selective pharmacological tools. Here, we present our characterization of GPR55 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. We describe GSK494581A (1-{2-fluoro-4-[1-(methyloxy)ethyl]phenyl}-4-{[4Ј-fluoro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-biphenylyl]carbonyl}piperazine), a selective small-molecule ligand of GPR55 identified through diversity screening. GSK494581A is one of a series of benzoylpiperazines originally identified and patented as inhibitors of the glycine transporter subtype 1 (GlyT1). The structure-activity relationship between GPR55 and GlyT1 is divergent across this series. The most GPR55-selective example is GSK575594A (3-fluoro-4-(4-{[4Ј-fluoro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-biphenylyl]carbonyl}-1-piperazinyl) aniline), which is approximately 60-fold selective for GPR55 (pEC 50 ϭ 6.8) over GlyT1 (pIC 50 ϭ 5.0). Several exemplars with activity at GPR55 and GlyT1 have been profiled at a broad range of other molecular targets and are inactive at cannabinoid receptors and all other targets tested. The benzoylpiperazine agonists activate human GPR55 but not rodent GPR55, suggesting that the relatively low level of sequence identity between these orthologs (75%) translates to important functional differences in the ligand-binding site