17 research outputs found
Incidence of pulmonary hypertension and determining factors in patients with systemic sclerosis
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and determining factors in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and a DLCO < 60% predicted.Methods:In this bicentric, prospective cohort study, patients with SSc were assessed at baseline and after 3 years clinically including right heart catheterization (RHC). Analysis of determining factors for development of PH was performed using univariate and multivariate analysis.Results:Ninety-six patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) <25 mmHg at baseline were followed 2.95±0.7 (median 3) years. Seventy-one had a second RHC; 18 of the 71 patients (25.3%) developed PH, 5 (7%) a SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. For patients with mPAP between 21 and 24 mmHg at baseline, the likelihood of presenting with PH as opposed to normal pressures on follow-up was significantly higher (p=0.026). Pulmonary vascular resistance, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, diffusion capacity and size of inferior vena cava at baseline were independent predictors for development of PH during follow-up.Conclusion:In a selected cohort of SSc patients with a DLCO < 60%, pulmonary pressures appear to rise progressively during follow up. In this population using prospective RHC during follow-up it was possible to identify manifest PH in almost 25% of 44 patients. Therefore, regular clinical assessment including RHC might be useful in SSc-patients.Most important findings:In a selected cohort of SSc patients pulmonary pressures appear to rise progressively, leading to a development of manifest PH in 25% within 3 years
Early treatment with ambrisentan of mildly elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure associated with systemic sclerosis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group study (EDITA study)
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, trial was to assess the effect of ambrisentan on mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and mildly elevated pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: Thirty-eight SSc patients with mildly elevated mPAP at rest between 21 and 24 mmHg and/or > 30 mmHg during low-dose exercise were randomly assigned to treatment with either ambrisentan 5-10 mg/day or placebo. Right heart catheterization and further clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. The primary endpoint was the difference of mPAP change at rest between groups. RESULTS: After 6 months, the two groups did not differ in the primary endpoint (ambrisentan mPAP - 1 ± 6.4 mmHg vs. placebo - 0.73 ± 3.59 mmHg at rest, p = 0.884). However, three patients from the placebo group but none of the ambrisentan group progressed to SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Furthermore, ambrisentan treatment showed significant improvements in the secondary endpoints cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at rest (CI 0.36 ± 0.66 l/min/m2 vs. - 0.31 ± 0.71 l/min/m2, p = 0.010; PVR - 0.70 ± 0.78 WU vs. 0.01 ± 0.71 WU, p = 0.012) and during exercise (CI 0.7 ± 0.81 l/min/m2 vs. - 0.45 ± 1.36 l/min/m2, p = 0.015; PVR - 0.84 ± 0.48 WU vs. - 0.0032 ± 0.34 WU, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study testing the effect of ambrisentan in patients with mildly elevated mPAP and/or exercise PH. The primary endpoint change in mPAP did only tendentially improve in the ambrisentan group, but the significant improvement of other hemodynamic parameters points to a possible benefit of ambrisentan and will be helpful to design future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, unique identifier NCT: NCT02290613 , registered 14th of November 2014
Effect of Supervised Training Therapy on Pulmonary Arterial Compliance and Stroke Volume in Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Inoperable or Persistent Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Background: Pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC) is a prognostic parameter in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) reflecting the elasticity of the pulmonary vessels. Objectives: The objective of this post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess the effect of exercise training on PAC and stroke volume (SV) in patients with PAH and persistent/inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Method: From the previous RCT, 43 out of 87 patients with severe PAH (n = 29) and CTEPH (n = 14) had complete haemodynamic examinations at baseline and after 15 weeks by right heart catheterization and were analysed (53% female, 79% World Health Organization functional class III/IV, 58% combination therapy, 42% on supplemental oxygen therapy, training group n = 24, and control group n = 19). Medication remained unchanged for all patients. Results: Low-dose exercise training at 4-7 days/week significantly improved PAC (training group 0.33 ± 0.65 mL/mm Hg vs. control group -0.06 ± 1.10 mL/mm Hg; mean difference 0.39 mL/mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.94 mL/mm Hg; p = 0.004) and SV (training group 9.9 ± 13.4 mL/min vs. control group -4.2 ± 11.0 mL/min; mean difference 14.2 mL, 95% CI 6.5-21.8 mL; p < 0.001) in the training versus control group. Furthermore, exercise training significantly improved cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance at rest, peak oxygen consumption, and oxygen pulse. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that supervised exercise training may improve right ventricular function and PAC at the same time. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings
Risk stratification and prognostic factors in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and comorbidities a cross-sectional cohort study with survival follow-up
Background: The objective of this study was to analyze prognostic factors and risk stratification in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and comorbidities. Methods: Patients with invasively diagnosed PAH were included in the analysis. Comorbidities were clinically diagnosed as proposed in the 6th World Symposium of pulmonary hypertension. Uni- and multivariate analysis were employed for identification of factors predicting survival and time to first clinical worsening (TTCW). Risk stratification was based on parameters from ESC/ERS-guidelines 2015. Results: In total 142 patients were enrolled in the study, 90 of them were diagnosed as PAH without and 52 with comorbidities. All patients received targeted PAH therapy and were followed for 3.3 ± 2.4 years. In PAH patients without comorbidities survival and TTCW were significantly associated with reduced 6-min walking distance (6MWD), elevated N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), WHO-functional class (WHO-FC) and right atrial (RA) area. In the multivariate analysis, 6MWD was an independent predictor for survival (p = 0.002) and WHO-FC for TTCW (p = 0.001). In patients with PAH and comorbidities these parameters had no significant association with survival and TTCW. Average risk score was significantly associated with survival (p = 0.001) and TTCW (p = 0.013) in PAH but not in PAH with comorbidities (both p > 0.05; figure 1). Conclusion: Risk stratification based on ESC/ERS-guidelines could only be confirmed in patients without comorbidities, but not in patients with PAH and comorbidities. The data of this study suggest, that a different risk stratification needs to be applied to PAH patients with comorbidities. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Trial registration: Not applicable, retrospective registry
Myeloproliferative diseases as possible risk factor for development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension—a genetic study
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease which is often caused by recurrent emboli. These are also frequently found in patients with myeloproliferative diseases. While myeloproliferative diseases can be caused by gene defects, the genetic predisposition to CTEPH is largely unexplored. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyse these genes and further genes involved in pulmonary hypertension in CTEPH patients. A systematic screening was conducted for pathogenic variants using a gene panel based on next generation sequencing. CTEPH was diagnosed according to current guidelines. In this study, out of 40 CTEPH patients 4 (10%) carried pathogenic variants. One patient had a nonsense variant (c.2071A>T p.Lys691*) in the BMPR2 gene and three further patients carried the same pathogenic variant (missense variant, c.1849G>T p.Val617Phe) in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. The latter led to a myeloproliferative disease in each patient. The prevalence of this JAK2 variant was significantly higher than expected (p < 0.0001). CTEPH patients may have a genetic predisposition more often than previously thought. The predisposition for myeloproliferative diseases could be an additional risk factor for CTEPH development. Thus, clinical screening for myeloproliferative diseases and genetic testing may be considered also for CTEPH patients