Prospective evaluation of weekly concomitant tumor bed boost with three-week hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in early breast cancer

Objectives: A prospective study was conducted to assess the acute and late toxicity of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation with a weekly concomitant boost for women with early breast cancer (EBC). Methods: Women with EBC who underwent breast-conserving surgery were eligible. A dose of 40Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks was delivered to the whole breast with a concomitant weekly boost to the post-operative cavity of 3Gy in three fractions. Toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity and RTOG/EORTC late toxicity scales. Results: A total of 67 women were enrolled with a median age of 49 years (range 31–69). Median follow-up was 25 months (range 11–34). Acute skin reactions included grade (G) 1 (n = 47, 70%), G2 (n = 10, 13%), and G3 (n = 1, 1.5%). Late skin toxicity was observed in 13 patients (19%), all of whom experienced G1 toxicity only. On multivariable analysis, diabetes mellitus was predictive of acute skin toxicity (p = 0.003), while age less than 50 years (p = 0.029) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.013) were predictive of late skin toxicity. Conclusions: Whole breast irradiation with concomitant weekly boost appears feasible and safe. Further investigation is required to fully evaluate this schedule as an alternative to conventional whole breast irradiation with a sequential boost

Tangential beam IMRT versus tangential beam 3D-CRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: A dosimetric comparison

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This study evaluates the dose distribution of reversed planned tangential beam intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to standard wedged tangential beam three-dimensionally planned conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) of the chest wall in unselected postmastectomy breast cancer patients</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For 20 unselected subsequent postmastectomy breast cancer patients tangential beam IMRT and tangential beam 3D-CRT plans were generated for the radiotherapy of the chest wall. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Dose-volume histograms were evaluated for the PTV and organs at risk. Parameters of the dose distribution were compared using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Tangential beam IMRT statistically significantly reduced the ipsilateral mean lung dose by an average of 21% (1129 cGy versus 1437 cGy). In all patients treated on the left side, the heart volume encompassed by the 70% isodose line (V70%; 35 Gy) was reduced by an average of 43% (5.7% versus 10.6%), and the mean heart dose by an average of 20% (704 cGy versus 877 cGy). The PTV showed a significantly better conformity index with IMRT; the homogeneity index was not significantly different.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Tangential beam IMRT significantly reduced the dose-volume of the ipsilateral lung and heart in unselected postmastectomy breast cancer patients.</p

A Novel Method for Predicting Late Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Radiation Therapy and the Need for Age-Based Risk-Adapted Dose Constraints

BACKGROUND: There are no well-established normal tissue sparing dose–volume histogram (DVH) criteria that limit the risk of urinary toxicity from prostate radiation therapy (RT). The aim of this study was to determine which criteria predict late toxicity among various DVH parameters when contouring the entire solid bladder and its contents versus the bladder wall. The area under the histogram curve (AUHC) was also analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1993 to 2000, 503 men with prostate cancer received 3-dimensional conformal RT (median follow-up time, 71 months). The whole bladder and the bladder wall were contoured in all patients. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring ≥3 months after completion of RT. Cox regressions of time to grade ≥2 toxicity were estimated separately for the entire bladder and bladder wall. Concordance probability estimates (CPE) assessed model discriminative ability. Before training the models, an external random test group of 100 men was set aside for testing. Separate analyses were performed based on the mean age (≤ 68 vs >68 years). RESULTS: Age, pretreatment urinary symptoms, mean dose (entire bladder and bladder wall), and AUHC (entire bladder and bladder wall) were significant (P<.05) in multivariable analysis. Overall, bladder wall CPE values were higher than solid bladder values. The AUHC for bladder wall provided the greatest discrimination for late bladder toxicity when compared with alternative DVH points, with CPE values of 0.68 for age ≤68 years and 0.81 for age >68 years. CONCLUSION: The AUHC method based on bladder wall volumes was superior for predicting late GU toxicity. Age >68 years was associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity, which suggests that risk-adapted dose constraints based on age should be explored