Daytime sleep has no effect on the time course of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning

Sleep has previously been claimed to be essential for the continued learning processes of declarative information as well as procedural learning. This study was conducted to examine the importance of sleep, especially the effects of midday naps, on motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning. Thirty-five (27 females) healthy, young adults aged between 18 and 30years of age participated in the current study. Addressing potential differences in explicit sequence and motor adaptation learning participants were asked to learn both, a nine-element explicit sequence and a motor adaptation task, in a crossover fashion on two consecutive days. Both tasks were performed with their non-dominant left hand. Prior to learning, each participant was randomized to one of three interventions; (1) power nap: 10-20min sleep, (2) long nap: 50-80min sleep or (3) a 45-min wake-condition. Performance of the motor learning task took place prior to and after a midday rest period, as well as after a night of sleep. Both sleep conditions were dominated by Stage N2 sleep with embedded sleep spindles, which have been described to be associated with enhancement of motor performance. Significant performance changes were observed in both tasks across all interventions (sleep and wake) confirming that learning took place. In the present setup, the magnitude of motor learning was not sleep-dependent in young adults - no differences between the intervention groups (short nap, long nap, no nap) could be found. The effect of the following night of sleep was not influenced by the previous midday rest or sleep period. This finding may be related to the selectiveness of the human brain enhancing especially memory being thought of as important in the future. Previous findings on motor learning enhancing effects of sleep, especially of daytime sleep, are challenged

Early functional connectivity alterations in contralesional motor networks influence outcome after severe stroke: a preliminary analysis

Abstract Connectivity studies have significantly extended the knowledge on motor network alterations after stroke. Compared to interhemispheric or ipsilesional networks, changes in the contralesional hemisphere are poorly understood. Data obtained in the acute stage after stroke and in severely impaired patients are remarkably limited. This exploratory, preliminary study aimed to investigate early functional connectivity changes of the contralesional parieto-frontal motor network and their relevance for the functional outcome after severe motor stroke. Resting-state functional imaging data were acquired in 19 patients within the first 2 weeks after severe stroke. Nineteen healthy participants served as a control group. Functional connectivity was calculated from five key motor areas of the parieto-frontal network on the contralesional hemisphere as seed regions and compared between the groups. Connections exhibiting stroke-related alterations were correlated with clinical follow-up data obtained after 3–6 months. The main finding was an increase in coupling strength between the contralesional supplementary motor area and the sensorimotor cortex. This increase was linked to persistent clinical deficits at follow-up. Thus, an upregulation in contralesional motor network connectivity might be an early pattern in severely impaired stroke patients. It might carry relevant information regarding the outcome which adds to the current concepts of brain network alterations and recovery processes after severe stroke

Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature

<div><p>Background and objective</p><p>To determine rates of adverse events (AEs) related to deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery or implanted devices from a large series from a single institution. Sound comparisons with the literature require the definition of unambiguous categories, since there is no consensus on the reporting of such AEs.</p><p>Patients and methods</p><p>123 consecutive patients (median age 63 yrs; female 45.5%) treated with DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (78 patients), ventrolateral thalamus (24), internal pallidum (20), and centre médian-parafascicular nucleus (1) were analyzed retrospectively. Both mean and median follow-up time was 4.7 years (578 patient-years). AEs were assessed according to three unambiguous categories: (i) hemorrhages including other intracranial complications because these might lead to neurological deficits or death, (ii) infections and similar AEs necessitating the explantation of hardware components as this results in the interruption of DBS therapy, and (iii) lead revisions for various reasons since this involves an additional intracranial procedure. For a systematic review of the literature AE rates were calculated based on primary data presented in 103 publications. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I² statistic and analyzed further by a random effects meta-regression. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plots.</p><p>Results</p><p>Surgery- or hardware-related AEs (23) affected 18 of 123 patients (14.6%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. In 2 patients (1.6%), small hemorrhages in the striatum were associated with transient neurological deficits. In 4 patients (3.3%; 0.7% per patient-year) impulse generators were removed due to infection. In 2 patients electrodes were revised (1.6%; 0.3% per patient-year). There was no lead migration or surgical revision because of lead misplacement. Age was not statistically significant different (p>0.05) between patients affected by AEs or not. AE rates did not decline over time and similar incidences were found among all patients (423) implanted with DBS systems at our institution until December 2016. A systematic literature review revealed that exact AE rates could not be determined from many studies, which could not be attributed to study designs. Average rates for intracranial complications were 3.8% among studies (per-study analysis) and 3.4% for pooled analysis of patients from different studies (per-patient analysis). Annual hardware removal rates were 3.6 and 2.4% for per-study and per-patient analysis, respectively, and lead revision rates were 4.1 and 2.6%, respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I² ranged between 77% and 91% for the three categories; p< 0.0001). For hardware removal heterogeneity (I² = 87.4%) was reduced by taking study size (p< 0.0001) and publication year (p< 0.01) into account, although a significant degree of heterogeneity remained (I² = 80.0%; p< 0.0001). Based on comparisons with health care-related databases there appears to be publication bias with lower rates for hardware-related AEs in published patient cohorts.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The proposed categories are suited for an unequivocal assessment of AEs even in a retrospective manner and useful for benchmarking. AE rates in the present cohorts from our institution compare favorable with the literature.</p></div

Systematic review of the literature based on a triad of categories.

<p>Systematic review of the literature based on a triad of categories.</p

Evaluation of study quality based on questions from common check lists.

<p>Evaluation of study quality based on questions from common check lists.</p

Intracerebral hemorrhages in the striatum along implanted electrodes (arrows) as detected in CT scans obtained on postoperative day three (A and B, patient#1; STN stimulation; diameter 1.2 cm) and day one (C and D, patient#2; GPI stimulation; diameter < 1 cm).

<p>Intracerebral hemorrhages in the striatum along implanted electrodes (arrows) as detected in CT scans obtained on postoperative day three (A and B, patient#1; STN stimulation; diameter 1.2 cm) and day one (C and D, patient#2; GPI stimulation; diameter < 1 cm).</p

Evaluation of publication bias.

<p>Evaluation of publication bias.</p

Percent lead revision per patient-year.

<p>The rate of AEs is color-coded. The number of patient-years calculated for individual studies is indicated by the height of the wedges (cutoff value 1000 patient-years).</p

Percent hardware removal per patient-year.

<p>The rate of AEs is color-coded. The number of patient-years calculated for individual studies is indicated by the height of the wedges (cutoff value 1000 patient-years).</p

Summary of literature-based rates for adverse events related to DBS surgery and implanted hardware.

<p>Summary of literature-based rates for adverse events related to DBS surgery and implanted hardware.</p