60 research outputs found

    Froude supercritical flow processes and sedimentary structures: new insights from experiments with a wide range of grain sizes

    Get PDF
    Recognition of Froude supercritical flow deposits in environments that range from rivers to the ocean floor has triggered a surge of interest in their flow processes, bedforms and sedimentary structures. Interpreting these supercritical flow deposits is especially important because they often represent the most powerful flows in the geological record. Insights from experiments are key to reconstruct palaeo‐flow processes from the sedimentary record. So far, all experimentally produced supercritical flow deposits are of a narrow grain‐size range (fine to medium sand), while deposits in the rock record often consist of a much wider grain‐size distribution. This paper presents results of supercritical‐flow experiments with a grain‐size distribution from clay to gravel. These experiments show that cyclic step instabilities can produce more complex and a larger variety of sedimentary structures than the previously suggested backsets and ‘scour and fill’ structures. The sedimentary structures are composed of irregular lenses, mounds and wedges with backsets and foresets, as well as undulating planar to low‐angle upstream and downstream dipping laminae. The experiments also demonstrate that the Froude number is not the only control on the sedimentary structures formed by supercritical‐flow processes. Additional controls include the size and migration rate of the hydraulic jump and the substrate cohesion. This study further demonstrates that Froude supercritical flow promotes suspension transport of all grain sizes, including gravels. Surprisingly, it was observed that all grain sizes were rapidly deposited just downstream of hydraulic jumps, including silt and clay. These results expand the range of dynamic mud deposition into supercritical‐flow conditions, where local transient shear stress reduction rather than overall flow waning conditions allow for deposition of fines. Comparison of the experimental deposits with outcrop datasets composed of conglomerates to mudstones, shows significant similarities and highlights the role of hydraulic jumps, rather than overall flow condition changes, in producing lithologically and geometrically complex stratigraphy

    Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments

    Full text link

    Improving non-geometric data available to simulation programs

    No full text
    Building performance simulation tools have significantly improved in quality and depth of analysis capability over the past 35 years. Yet, despite these increased capabilities, simulation programs still depend on user entry for significant data about building components, loads, and other typically scheduled inputs. This often forces users to estimate values or find previously compiled sets of data for these inputs. Often there is little information about how the data were derived, what purposes it is fit for, which standards apply, uncertainty associated with each data field as well as a general description of the data.A similar problem bedeviled access to weather data and Crawley et al. [1999. Improving the weather information available to simulation programs, In: Proceedings of building simulation '99, vol. 2,Kyoto, Japan, 13-15 September 1999. IBPSA, p. 529-36.] described a generalized weather data format developed for use with two energy simulation programs, which has subsequently led to a repository which is accessed by thousands of practitioners each year. This paper describes a generalized format and data documentation for such user inputs - whether it is building envelope components, scheduled loads, or environmental emissions - the widgets upon which all models are dependant. We present several examples including building envelope component, a scheduled occupant load, and environmental emissions and speculate on how such data might be incorporated in existing data schemes and simulation tools

    Proper Model Selection with Significance Test

    No full text
    • 

    corecore