17 research outputs found
High Irritation and Removal Rates After Plate or Nail Fixation in Patients With Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
Background: Studies comparing plate with intramedullary nail fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures show faster recovery in the plate group and implant-related complications in both groups after short-term followup (6 or 12 months). Knowledge of disability, complications, and removal rates beyond the first postoperative year will help surgeons in making a decision regarding optimal implant choice. However, comparative studies with followup beyond the first year or two are scarce. Questions/purposes: We asked: (1) Does plate fixation or intramedullary nail fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures result in less disability? (2) Which type of fixation, plate or intramedullary, is more frequently associated with implant-related irritation and implant removal? (3) Is plate or intramedullary fixation associated with postoperative complications beyond the first postoperative year? Methods: Between January 2011 and August 2012, patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled and randomized to plate or intramedullary nail fixation. A total of 58 patients with plate and 62 patients with intramedullary nails initially were enrolled. Minimum followup was 30 months (mean, 39 months; range, 30–51 months). Two patients (3%) with plate fixation and two patients (3%) with intramedullary nails were lost to followup. The Qui
A randomized controlled trial of nonoperative treatment versus open reduction and internal fixation for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head: The RAMBO trial
Background: The choice between operative or nonoperative treatment is questioned for partial articular fractures of the radial head that have at least 2 millimeters of articular step-off on at least one radiograph (defined as displaced), but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments (defined as stable) and that are not associated with an elbow dislocation, interosseous ligament injury, or other fractures. These kinds of fractures are often classified as Mason type-2 fractures. Retrospective comparative studies suggest that operative treatment might be better than nonoperative treatment, but the long-term results of nonoperative treatment are very good. Most experts agree that problems like reduced range of motion, painful crepitation, nonunion or bony ankylosis are infrequent with both nonoperative and operative treatment of an isolated displaced partial articular fracture of the radial head, but determining which patients will have problems is difficult. A prospective, randomized comparison would help minimize bias and determine the balance between operative and nonoperative risks and benefits. Methods/Design. The RAMBO trial (Radial Head - Amsterdam - Amphia - Boston - Others) is an international prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare patient related outcome defined by the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score' twelve months after injury between operative and nonoperative treated patients. Adult patients with partial articular fractures of the radial head that comprise at least 1/3rd of the articular surface, have ≥ 2 millimeters of articular step-off but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments will be enrolled. Secondary outcome measures will be the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), pain intensity through the 'Numeric Rating Scale', range of motion (flexion arc and rotational arc), radiographic appearance of the fracture (heterotopic ossification, radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral arthrosis, fracture healing, and signs of implant loosening or breakage) and adverse events (infection, nerve injury, secondary interventions) after one year. Discussion. The successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head. Trial registration. The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register: NTR3413
Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures
Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo
Arteria brachialis letsels na hartcatheterisatie
Contains fulltext :
mmubn000001_077237447.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Promotor : S. Skotnicki143 p
Recognising vascular causes of leg complaints in endurance athletes.Part 1 Validation of a Decision Algorithm
Flow limitations in the iliac arteries of endurance athletes during exercise were previously ascribed solely to intravascular lesions. We postulate that functional kinking of the arteries can also result in flow limitations. However, the diagnostic tools in routine practice are not effective in diagnosing such flow limitations in a substantial proportion of athletes, mainly because these diagnostic tools do not measure in the provocative situations. Ninety-two symptomatic legs in 80 endurance athletes were examined with newly developed, sports-specific vascular tests. Thirty-five asymptomatic cyclists matched for working capacity served as the control subjects. Legs were classified as vascular or non-vascular following a decision algorithm, based upon the results of these diagnostic tests, excluding orthopaedic causes by the effects of specific treatment. Independently of this clinical classification, an alternative method was applied to find stable characteristics in the total patient group using factor analysis. This characterisation was based on scores on 14 test variables deriving from diagnostic tests that were not used in the decision algorithm, thus avoiding dependency between the clinical categorisation and the statistical categorisation. The hypothesis was that these characteristics were sufficiently sensitive to classify patients with vascular and non-vascular complaints. If so, these characteristics should correspond with the one derived from the decision algorithm. Following the decision algorithm, 58 legs (63 %) were classified as vascular, 29 (32 %) as non-vascular and 5 (5 %) as inconclusive. The latter were considered non-vascular. In a substantial proportion of the vascular patients, kinking of the iliac arteries was identified as the major cause of flow limitation. The characteristics derived from factor analysis proved to classify 87 % in agreement with the decision algorithm (kappa 0.56). The agreement is sufficient for validation of the clinical classification. The algorithm can therefore be applied in clinical situations to diagnose endurance athletes with flow limitations due to both intravascular lesions and kinking of the arteries
Recognising vascular causes of leg complaints in endurance athletes.Part 2
Leg complaints at maximal exercise in endurance athletes may have many causes, including arterial flow limitations in the iliac arteries. Such flow limitations can evolve into serious health problems due to increasing intravascular obstruction or even complete obstruction as a result of dissection or thrombosis. Early detection is therefore of clinical importance, but conventional diagnostic tools often prove inadequate. In the current study simple sports-specific tests are examined for their diagnostic power. Test variables derived from patient history, physical examination, cycling exercise testing followed by arterial pressure measurements at the ankle, and echo-Doppler examination with provocative manoeuvres were tested in 92 symptomatic legs (80 patients). A validated clinical classification acted as a reference. Several test variables proved useful. However, no single test variable combined a high sensitivity with a high specificity. Multivariate testing resulted in the correct classification of 91 % of patients, reaching a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.93 (kappa 0.76). Four patients wrongly classified as non-vascular suffered from kinking in the common iliac artery that could not be visualised using the diagnostic tools currently available in this study. In conclusion: simple sports-specific tests accurately diagnose iliac artery obstruction in endurance athletes