5 research outputs found
A visual survey of the inshore fish communities of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands).
An in situ visual survey technique (5 minutes and 100 m2 area) was used to assess the inshore fishes off Gran Canaria. In 1996, 211 visual surveys were conducted at 7 localities. Locations differed significantly among each other with regards to the number of species per survey (ANOVA: p < 0.01). The five most abundant species were Chromis limbatus, Boops boops, Pomadasys incisus, Abudefduf luridus, and Thalassoma pavo with respective mean abundances of 65.6, 37.4, 16.7, 8.7, and 4.5 per 100 m2. Detrended Correspondence Analysis, a multivariate ordination technique showed that the major determinant of community structure is substrate type. The majority of the surveyed species had low axis 1 ordination scores indicating a strong association with a hard substrate. The step-wise linear
regression models explained 45.3 % and 1 1.4% of the variation in the first and second axis survey ordination scores, respectively
A Methodological Framework for the Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Imputation Methods: Multiple Imputation of Race, Ethnicity and Body Mass Index in the U.S. National COVID Cohort Collaborative
While electronic health records are a rich data source for biomedical
research, these systems are not implemented uniformly across healthcare
settings and significant data may be missing due to healthcare fragmentation
and lack of interoperability between siloed electronic health records.
Considering that the deletion of cases with missing data may introduce severe
bias in the subsequent analysis, several authors prefer applying a multiple
imputation strategy to recover the missing information. Unfortunately, although
several literature works have documented promising results by using any of the
different multiple imputation algorithms that are now freely available for
research, there is no consensus on which MI algorithm works best. Beside the
choice of the MI strategy, the choice of the imputation algorithm and its
application settings are also both crucial and challenging. In this paper,
inspired by the seminal works of Rubin and van Buuren, we propose a
methodological framework that may be applied to evaluate and compare several
multiple imputation techniques, with the aim to choose the most valid for
computing inferences in a clinical research work. Our framework has been
applied to validate, and extend on a larger cohort, the results we presented in
a previous literature study, where we evaluated the influence of crucial
patients' descriptors and COVID-19 severity in patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus whose data is provided by the National COVID Cohort Collaborative
Enclave
Recommended from our members
The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Clinical Characterization and Early Severity Prediction
The majority of U.S. reports of COVID-19 clinical characteristics, disease course, and treatments are from single health systems or focused on one domain. Here we report the creation of the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), a centralized, harmonized, high-granularity electronic health record repository that is the largest, most representative U.S. cohort of COVID-19 cases and controls to date. This multi-center dataset supports robust evidence-based development of predictive and diagnostic tools and informs critical care and policy.
In a retrospective cohort study of 1,926,526 patients from 34 medical centers nationwide, we stratified patients using a World Health Organization COVID-19 severity scale and demographics; we then evaluated differences between groups over time using multivariable logistic regression. We established vital signs and laboratory values among COVID-19 patients with different severities, providing the foundation for predictive analytics. The cohort included 174,568 adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PCR >99% or antigen <1%) as well as 1,133,848 adult patients that served as lab-negative controls. Among 32,472 hospitalized patients, mortality was 11.6% overall and decreased from 16.4% in March/April 2020 to 8.6% in September/October 2020 (p = 0.002 monthly trend). In a multivariable logistic regression model, age, male sex, liver disease, dementia, African-American and Asian race, and obesity were independently associated with higher clinical severity. To demonstrate the utility of the N3C cohort for analytics, we used machine learning (ML) to predict clinical severity and risk factors over time. Using 64 inputs available on the first hospital day, we predicted a severe clinical course (death, discharge to hospice, invasive ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) using random forest and XGBoost models (AUROC 0.86 and 0.87 respectively) that were stable over time. The most powerful predictors in these models are patient age and widely available vital sign and laboratory values. The established expected trajectories for many vital signs and laboratory values among patients with different clinical severities validates observations from smaller studies, and provides comprehensive insight into COVID-19 characterization in U.S. patients.
This is the first description of an ongoing longitudinal observational study of patients seen in diverse clinical settings and geographical regions and is the largest COVID-19 cohort in the United States. Such data are the foundation for ML models that can be the basis for generalizable clinical decision support tools. The N3C Data Enclave is unique in providing transparent, reproducible, easily shared, versioned, and fully auditable data and analytic provenance for national-scale patient-level EHR data. The N3C is built for intensive ML analyses by academic, industry, and citizen scientists internationally. Many observational correlations can inform trial designs and care guidelines for this new disease