20 research outputs found
Mechanism of Photocatalytic Cyclization of Bromoalkenes with a Dimeric Gold Complex
In recent years,
dimeric gold complexes have been extensively used
in photoredox reactions and have successfully mediated a series of
traditionally challenging organic reactions. However, little is known
about the function of the dimeric gold complexes in these reactions.
In this study, we systematically studied the mechanism of the photocatalytic
cyclization of bromoalkenes with the dimeric gold complex [Au<sub>2</sub>(dppm)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (dppm denotes bisÂ(diphenylphosphino)Âmethane).
It is found that the dimeric gold complex acts as the radical initiator
and terminator in this radical chain reaction. In the radical initiation
step, the gold complex first promotes the electron transfer from amine
to the bromoalkene substrate (via a reductive quenching mode) and
then accepts the released bromide (from bromoalkene) to stabilize
the reaction system. In the radical termination step, the dimeric
gold complex mainly works as an unsynchronized bromine and electron
donor. In the photocatalytic cyclization of bromoalkenes, the radical
propagation step operates between the alkyl radical and the dehydrogenated
amine radical. This study sheds light on the function of the dimeric
gold complex in photoredox reactions and will hopefully benefit the
future understanding of similar synthetic reactions
Mechanism of Photocatalytic Cyclization of Bromoalkenes with a Dimeric Gold Complex
In recent years,
dimeric gold complexes have been extensively used
in photoredox reactions and have successfully mediated a series of
traditionally challenging organic reactions. However, little is known
about the function of the dimeric gold complexes in these reactions.
In this study, we systematically studied the mechanism of the photocatalytic
cyclization of bromoalkenes with the dimeric gold complex [Au<sub>2</sub>(dppm)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (dppm denotes bisÂ(diphenylphosphino)Âmethane).
It is found that the dimeric gold complex acts as the radical initiator
and terminator in this radical chain reaction. In the radical initiation
step, the gold complex first promotes the electron transfer from amine
to the bromoalkene substrate (via a reductive quenching mode) and
then accepts the released bromide (from bromoalkene) to stabilize
the reaction system. In the radical termination step, the dimeric
gold complex mainly works as an unsynchronized bromine and electron
donor. In the photocatalytic cyclization of bromoalkenes, the radical
propagation step operates between the alkyl radical and the dehydrogenated
amine radical. This study sheds light on the function of the dimeric
gold complex in photoredox reactions and will hopefully benefit the
future understanding of similar synthetic reactions
Mechanistic Study of Chemoselectivity in Ni-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions between Azoles and Aryl Carboxylates
Itami et al. recently reported the
C–O electrophile-controlled
chemoselectivity of Ni-catalyzed coupling reactions between azoles
and esters: the decarbonylative C–H coupling product was generated
with the aryl ester substrates, while C–H/C–O coupling
product was generated with the phenol derivative substrates (such
as phenyl pivalate). With the aid of DFT calculations (M06L/6-311+GÂ(2d,p)-SDD//B3LYP/6-31GÂ(d)-LANL2DZ),
the present study systematically investigated the mechanism of the
aforementioned chemoselective reactions. The decarbonylative C–H
coupling mechanism involves oxidative addition of CÂ(acyl)–O
bond, base-promoted C–H activation of azole, CO migration,
and reductive elimination steps (C–H/Decar mechanism). This
mechanism is partially different from Itami’s previous proposal
(Decar/C–H mechanism) because the C–H activation step
is unlikely to occur after the CO migration step. Meanwhile, C–H/C–O
coupling reaction proceeds through oxidative addition of CÂ(phenyl)–O
bond, base-promoted C–H activation, and reductive elimination
steps. It was found that the C–O electrophile significantly
influences the overall energy demand of the decarbonylative C–H
coupling mechanism, because the rate-determining step (i.e., CO migration)
is sensitive to the steric effect of the acyl substituent. In contrast,
in the C–H/C–O coupling mechanism, the release of the
carboxylates occurs before the rate-determining step (i.e., base-promoted
C–H activation), and thus the overall energy demand is almost
independent of the acyl substituent. Accordingly, the decarbonylative
C–H coupling product is favored for less-bulky group substituted
C–O electrophiles (such as aryl ester), while C–H/C–O
coupling product is predominant for bulky group substituted C–O
electrophiles (such as phenyl pivalate)
Mechanistic Investigation of Visible-Light-Induced Intermolecular [2 + 2] Photocycloaddition Catalyzed with Chiral Thioxanthone
The
recent thioxanthone-sensitizer-catalyzed intermolecular [2
+ 2] cycloaddition induced by visible-light irradiation set the stage
for the future development of feasible photocycloadditions. Nonetheless,
the mechanism of this reaction still remains under debate, especially
on the activation mode of the thioxanthone photosensitizer (energy
transfer, bielectron exchange, and hydrogen transfer are all possible
mechanisms). To settle this issue, systematic density functional theory
calculations have been carried out. The results indicate that the
energy-transfer pathway is more favorable than the bielectron-exchange
and the hydrogen-transfer pathways. Meanwhile, the overall transformations
involve the complexation and excitation of photosensitizer, the first
C–C bond formation, the dissociation of the sensitizer, the
triplet-to-singlet electronic state crossing, and the second C–C
bond formation. The first C–C bond formation is the rate- and
selectivity-determining step, and synergistic energy and electron
transfer from photosensitizer to substrate moieties takes place along
this process. On this basis, the effect of olefin substrates (ethyl
vinyl ketone vs vinyl acetate) on the stereoselectivity was finally
analyzed
Mechanistic Study on Ligand-Controlled Rh(I)-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of Alkene-Benzocyclobutenone
Recently, Dong’s group [<i>Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.</i> <b>2012</b>, <i>51</i>, 7567–7571; <i>Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.</i> <b>2014</b>, <i>53</i>, 1891–1895] reported the ligand-controlled selectivity of
Rh-catalyzed intramolecular coupling reaction of alkene-benzocyclobutenone:
the direct coupling product (i.e., fused-rings) was formed in the
DPPB-assisted system (DPPB = PPh<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>), while the decarbonylative coupling product (i.e.,
spirocycles) was generated in the PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>-assited system. To explain this interesting selectivity,
density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been carried out
in the present study. It was found that the direct and decarbonylative
couplings experience the same CÂ(acyl)–CÂ(sp<sup>2</sup>) activation
and alkene insertion steps. The following C–C reductive elimination
or β-H elimination–decarbonylation–reductive elimination
leads to the direct or decarbonylative coupling reaction, respectively.
The coordination features of different ligands were found to significantly
influence C–C reductive elimination and decarbonylation step.
The requisite phosphine dissociation of DPPB ligand from Rh center
for the decarbonylation step is disfavored, and thus, the reductive
elimination and direct coupling reaction are favored therein. By contrast,
a free coordination site is available on the Rh center in the PÂ(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>3</sub>-assisted system, facilitating the
decarbonylation process together with the generation of related decarbonylative
coupling product
Size Growth of Au<sub>4</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>: From Increased Nucleation to Surface Capping
The size conversion of atomically precise metal nanoclusters
is
fundamental for elucidating structure-property correlations. In this
study, copper salt (CuCl)-induced size growth from [Au4Cu4(Dppm)2(SAdm)5]+ (abbreviated
as [Au4Cu4S5]+) to [Au4Cu6(Dppm)2(SAdm)4Cl3]+ (abbreviated
as [Au4Cu6S4Cl3]+)
(SAdmH = 1-adamantane mercaptan, Dppm = bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane)
was investigated via experiments and density functional theory calculations.
The [Au4Cu4S5]+ adopts a defective pentagonal bipyramid
core structure with surface cavities, which could be easily filled
with the sterically less hindered CuCl and CuSCy (i.e., core growth)
(HSCy = cyclohexanethiol) but not the bulky CuSAdm. As long as the
Au4Cu5 framework is formed, ligand exchange
or size growth occurs easily. However, owing to the compact pentagonal
bipyramid core structure, the latter growth mode occurs only for the
surface-capped [Au4Cu6(Dppm)2(SAdm)4Cl3]+ structure (i.e., surface-capped
size growth). A preliminary mechanistic study with density functional
theory (DFT) calculations indicated that the overall conversion occurred
via CuCl addition, core tautomerization, Cl migration, the second
[CuCl] addition, and [CuCl]-[CuSR] exchange steps. And the [Au4Cu6(Dppm)2(SAdm)4Cl3]+ alloy nanocluster exhibits aggregation-induced emission
(AIE) with an absolute luminescence quantum yield of 18.01% in the
solid state. This work sheds light on the structural transformation
of Au–Cu alloy nanoclusters induced by Cu(I) and contributes
to the knowledge base of metal-ion-induced size conversion of metal
nanoclusters
Mechanistic Investigation on Oxygen-Mediated Photoredox Diels–Alder Reactions with Chromium Catalysts
The recent dioxygen-mediated, Cr-complex-catalyzed
photoredox Diels–Alder
reaction between
two electron-rich substrates represents the first example of first-row
transition-metal photocatalysis. Motivated by the mechanistic ambiguity
(such as the inherent interactions of O<sub>2</sub> with Cr complexes
and the origin of the high selectivity), we performed systematic density
functional theory (DFT) calculations. The calculation results show
that O<sub>2</sub> shuttles an electron via an inner-sphere mechanism
(in the form of [CrL<sub>3</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>] complexes, L = Ph<sub>2</sub>phen). Meanwhile, the overall transformations involve the
excitation and quenching of the CrL<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> complex,
single-electron transfer from the dienophile to the excited state
CrL<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> catalyst (SET-1), asynchronous cycloaddition
(instead of synchronous), and the final single electron transfer from
the quintet [CrL<sub>3</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> complex (instead
of superoxide) to the radical cationic cycloadduct. The first C–C
bond formation in the asynchronous cycloaddition is the rate-determining
and selectivity-determining step. On this basis, the origins of the
chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity have been identified
Mechanistic Investigation on Oxygen-Mediated Photoredox Diels–Alder Reactions with Chromium Catalysts
The recent dioxygen-mediated, Cr-complex-catalyzed
photoredox Diels–Alder
reaction between
two electron-rich substrates represents the first example of first-row
transition-metal photocatalysis. Motivated by the mechanistic ambiguity
(such as the inherent interactions of O<sub>2</sub> with Cr complexes
and the origin of the high selectivity), we performed systematic density
functional theory (DFT) calculations. The calculation results show
that O<sub>2</sub> shuttles an electron via an inner-sphere mechanism
(in the form of [CrL<sub>3</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>] complexes, L = Ph<sub>2</sub>phen). Meanwhile, the overall transformations involve the
excitation and quenching of the CrL<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> complex,
single-electron transfer from the dienophile to the excited state
CrL<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> catalyst (SET-1), asynchronous cycloaddition
(instead of synchronous), and the final single electron transfer from
the quintet [CrL<sub>3</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> complex (instead
of superoxide) to the radical cationic cycloadduct. The first C–C
bond formation in the asynchronous cycloaddition is the rate-determining
and selectivity-determining step. On this basis, the origins of the
chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity have been identified
How a Single Electron Affects the Properties of the “Non-Superatom” Au<sub>25</sub> Nanoclusters
In this study, we
successfully synthesized the rod-like [Au<sub>25</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SePh)<sub>5</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]<sup><i>q</i></sup> (<i>q</i> = +1 or +2) nanoclusters
through kinetic control. The single crystal X-ray crystallography
determined their formulas to be [Au<sub>25</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SePh)<sub>5</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]Â(SbF<sub>6</sub>) and [Au<sub>25</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SePh)<sub>5</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]Â(SbF<sub>6</sub>)Â(BPh<sub>4</sub>), respectively. Compared to the
previously reported Au<sub>25</sub> coprotected by phosphine and thiolate
ligands (i.e., [Au<sub>25</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(SR)<sub>5</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>), the two new rod-like Au<sub>25</sub> nanoclusters show some interesting structural differences.
Nonetheless, each of these three nanoclusters possesses two icosahedral
Au<sub>13</sub> units (sharing a vertex gold atom) and the bridging
“Au–SeÂ(S)–Au” motifs. The compositions
of the two new nanoclusters were characterized with ESI-MS and TGA.
The optical properties, electrochemistry, and magnetism were studied
by EPR, NMR, and SQUID. All these results demonstrate that the valence
character significantly affects the properties of the “non-superatom”
Au<sub>25</sub> nanoclusters, and the changes are different from the
previously reported “superatom” Au<sub>25</sub> nanoclusters.
Theoretical calculations indicate that the extra electron results
in the half occupation of the highest occupied molecular orbitals
in the rod-like Au<sub>25</sub><sup>+</sup> nanoclusters and, thus,
significantly affects the electronic structure of the “non-superatom”
Au<sub>25</sub> nanoclusters. This work offers new insights into the
relationship between the properties and the valence of the “non-superatom”
gold nanoclusters
Crystal Structures of Two New Gold–Copper Bimetallic Nanoclusters: Cu<sub><i>x</i></sub>Au<sub>25–<i>x</i></sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>(PhC<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>S)<sub>5</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> and Cu<sub>3</sub>Au<sub>34</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>13</sub>(<sup>t</sup>BuPhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>6</sub>S<sub>2</sub><sup>3+</sup>
Herein, we report
the synthesis and atomic structures of the cluster-assembled
Cu<sub><i>x</i></sub>ÂAu<sub>25–<i>x</i></sub>Â(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>Â(PhCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>5</sub>ÂCl<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> and
Cu<sub>3</sub>ÂAu<sub>34</sub>Â(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>13</sub>Â(<sup>t</sup>BuPhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>6</sub>ÂS<sub>2</sub><sup>3+</sup> nanoclusters (NCs). The atomic structures of both NCs
were precisely determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography.
The Cu<sub><i>x</i></sub>ÂAu<sub>25–<i>x</i></sub>Â(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>10</sub>Â(PhC<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>S)<sub>5</sub>ÂCl<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> NC was assembled by two icosahedral M<sub>13</sub> via a vertex-sharing
mode. The Cu atom partially occupies the top and waist sites and is
monocoordinated with chlorine or thiol ligands. Meanwhile, the Cu<sub>3</sub>ÂAu<sub>34</sub>Â(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>13</sub>Â(<sup>t</sup>BuPhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>6</sub>ÂS<sub>2</sub><sup>3+</sup> NC can be described as three 13-atom icosahedra sharing three vertexes
in a cyclic fashion. The three Cu atoms all occupy the internal positions
of the cluster core. What is more important is that all three Cu atoms
in Cu<sub>3</sub>Au<sub>34</sub> are monocoordinated by the bare S
atoms. The absorption spectra of the as-synthesized bimetallic NCs
reveal that the additional metal doping and different cluster assemblies
affect the electronic structure of the monometallic NCs