Effect of Functional Capacity Evaluation information on the judgment of physicians about physical work ability in the context of disability claims

Purpose To test whether Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) information lead insurance physicians (IPs) to change their judgment about the physical work ability of claimants with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Methods Twenty-seven IPs scored twice the physical work ability of two claimants for 12 specified activities, using a visual analogue scale. One claimant performed an FCE, the other served as a control. Outcome measure was the difference between experimental and control group in number of shifts in the physical work ability for the total of 12 specified activities. Results The IPs changed their judgment about the work ability 141 times when using FCE information compared to 102 times when not using this information (P-value = 0.001), both in the direction of more and less ability. Conclusions The IPs change their judgment of the physical work ability of claimants with MSDs in the context of disability claim procedures more often when FCE information is provide

Interviews for the assessment of long-term incapacity for work: a study on adherence to protocols and principles

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessments for long-term incapacity for work are performed by Social Insurance Physicians (SIPs) who rely on interviews with claimants as an important part of the process. These interviews are susceptible to bias. In the Netherlands three protocols have been developed to conduct these interviews. These protocols are expert- and practice-based. We studied to what extent these protocols are adhered to by practitioners.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We compared the protocols with one another and with the ICF and the biopsychosocial approach. The protocols describe semi-structured interviews with comparable but not identical topics. All protocols prescribe that the client's opinion on his capacity for work, and his arguments, need to be determined and assessed. We developed a questionnaire to elicit the adherence SIPs have to the protocols, their underlying principles and topics. We conducted a survey among one hundred fifty-five experienced SIPs in the Netherlands.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ninety-eight SIPs responded (64%). All respondents used some form of protocol, either one of the published protocols or their own mix. We found no significant relation between training and the use of a particular protocol. Ninety percent use a semi-structured interview. Ninety-five percent recognise having to verify what the claimant says and eighty-three percent feel the need to establish a good relation (p = 0.019). Twelve topics are basically always addressed by over eighty percent of the respondents. The claimant's opinion of being fit for his own work or other work, and his claim of incapacity and his health arguments for that claim, reach a hundred percent. Description of claimants' previous work reaches ninety-nine percent.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study shows professional consensus among experienced Dutch SIPs about the principle of assessment on arguments, the principle of conducting a semi-structured interview and the most crucial interview topics. This consensus can be used to further develop a protocol for interviewing in the assessment of incapacity for work in social insurance. Such a protocol can improve the quality of the assessments in terms of transparency and reproducibility, as well as by enabling clients to better prepare themselves for the assessments.</p

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Lung Imaging Confederation.

PurposeTo improve outcomes for lung cancer through low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) early lung cancer detection. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer is developing the Early Lung Imaging Confederation (ELIC) to serve as an open-source, international, universally accessible environment to analyze large collections of quality-controlled LDCT images and associated biomedical data for research and routine screening care.MethodsELIC is an international confederation that allows access to efficiently analyze large numbers of high-quality computed tomography (CT) images with associated de-identified clinical information without moving primary imaging/clinical or imaging data from its local or regional site of origin. Rather, ELIC uses a cloud-based infrastructure to distribute analysis tools to the local site of the stored imaging and clinical data, thereby allowing for research and quality studies to proceed in a vendor-neutral, collaborative environment. ELIC's hub-and-spoke architecture will be deployed to permit analysis of CT images and associated data in a secure environment, without any requirement to reveal the data itself (ie, privacy protecting). Identifiable data remain under local control, so the resulting environment complies with national regulations and mitigates against privacy or data disclosure risk.ResultsThe goal of pilot experiments is to connect image collections of LDCT scans that can be accurately analyzed in a fashion to support a global network using methodologies that can be readily scaled to accrued databases of sufficient size to develop and validate robust quantitative imaging tools.ConclusionThis initiative can rapidly accelerate improvements to the multidisciplinary management of early, curable lung cancer and other major thoracic diseases (eg, coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) visualized on a screening LDCT scan. The addition of a facile, quantitative CT scanner image quality conformance process is a unique step toward improving the reliability of clinical decision support with CT screening worldwide

Compensatie en participatie : Het zoeken naar een balans in de verzekeringsgeneeskunde

De afgelopen jaren zijn de regels rond arbeidsongeschiktheid ingrijpend gewijzigd. Verzekeringsartsen dienen vast te stellen welk werk iemand nog zou kunnen doen na twee jaar ziekte. Die beoordeling heeft een statisch karakter en richt zich niet op de vraag of de patiënt ook daadwerkelijk aan het werk komt. In de toekomst zou de nadruk in de beoordeling meer moeten liggen op participatie en minder op compensatie, waarbij de beoordeling niet per definitie na twee jaar hoeft plaats te vinden. Als terugkeer naar de eigen werkgever niet meer mogelijk is, moet de verzekeringsarts ingeschakeld worden en re-integratie naar passend werk starten. Er zou niet gewacht moeten worden tot de twee jaar voorbij zijn. Alle artsen, zowel behandelende artsen als bedrijfs- en verzekeringsartsen, zijn betrokken bij de terugkeer van zieke werknemers naar werk. Scheiding van behandeling en controle heeft haar langste tijd gehad. Ook het onderscheid tussen bedrijfsartsen en verzekeringsartsen kan verdwijnen

Buitenspel staan met de Participatiewet

In January this year, a new law was introduced in the Netherlands aimed at improving opportunities for people who cannot find work, among them young people with impairments who still have - limited - ability to work. This law, the Participation Act, is executed by municipalities. All young people with the ability to work despite their impairments are entitled to support from the municipalities in finding a job. At present, only a small percentage of these young people are in paid employment. Bureaucracy threatens the proper implementation of the Participation Act and young people with impairments are particularly affected. Integrated action by municipalities and employers, and patience, are important for the promotion of work participation by young workers. The only way to accomplish the objective of the Participation Act is to make the participation in work of the youngster with impairments a central issu