Assessment of the genetic diversity of the Tunisian citrus rootstock germplasm

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Citrus represents a substantial income for farmers in the Mediterranean Basin. However, the Mediterranean citrus industry faces increasing biotic and abiotic constraints. Therefore the breeding and selection of new rootstocks are now of the utmost importance. In Tunisia, in addition to sour orange, the most widespread traditional rootstock of the Mediterranean area, other citrus rootstocks and well adapted to local environmental conditions, are traditionally used and should be important genetic resources for breeding. To characterize the diversity of Tunisian citrus rootstocks, two hundred and one local accessions belonging to four facultative apomictic species (<it>C. aurantium</it>, sour orange; <it>C. sinensis</it>, orange; <it>C. limon</it>, lemon; and <it>C. aurantifolia</it>, lime) were collected and genotyped using 20 nuclear SSR markers and four indel mitochondrial markers. Multi-locus genotypes (MLGs) were compared to references from French and Spanish collections.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The differentiation of the four varietal groups was well-marked. The groups displayed a relatively high allelic diversity, primarily due to very high heterozygosity. Sixteen distinct MLGs were identified. Ten of these were noted in sour oranges. However, the majority of the analysed sour orange accessions corresponded with only two MLGs, differentiated by a single allele, likely due to a mutation. The most frequent MLG is shared with the reference sour oranges. No polymorphism was found within the sweet orange group. Two MLGs, differentiated by a single locus, were noted in lemon. The predominant MLG was shared with the reference lemons. Limes were represented by three genotypes. Two corresponded to the 'Mexican lime' and 'limonette de Marrakech' references. The MLG of 'Chiiri' lime was unique.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Tunisian citrus rootstock genetic diversity is predominantly due to high heterozygosity and differentiation between the four varietal groups. The phenotypic diversity within the varietal groups has resulted from multiple introductions, somatic mutations and rare sexual recombination events. Finally, this diversity study enabled the identification of a core sample of accessions for further physiological and agronomical evaluations. These core accessions will be integrated into citrus rootstock breeding programs for the Mediterranean Basin.</p

Acta Horticulturae

It is believed that Citrus medica, C. maxima, C. reticulata and C. micrantha have generated all cultivated citrus species. Depending on the classification, lemons and limes are classified either into two species, C. limon and C. aurantifolia (Swingle and Reece, 1967) or into more than 30 (Tanaka, 1977). In order to study the molecular phylogeny of this citrus group, we analyzed 23 targeted sequenced nuclear genes and used three mitochondrial and five chloroplastic markers for 15 lemons and limes compared with representatives of the four basic taxa. We observed three main groups, each one derived from direct interspecific hybridizations: (1) the Mexican lime group (C. aurantifolia), including C. macrophylla, arising from hybridizations between papeda (C. micrantha) and citron (C. medica); (2) the yellow lemon group (C. limon) that are hybrids between sour orange (C. aurantium, which is believed to be a hybrid between C. maxima and C. reticulata) and citron; and (3) a rootstock lemon/lime group (Rough lemon and Rangpur lime) that are hybrids between an acid mandarin and a citron. We also identified different probable backcrosses and genotypes with more complex origin. None of the analyzed limes and lemons shared the C. medica cytoplasm, while this taxon is the common nuclear contributor of all limes and lemons. Limes and lemons appear to be a very complex citrus varietal group with the contribution of the 4 basic taxa. Neither the Swingle and Reece classification nor the Tanaka fit with the genetic evidence

NEW INSIGHTS ON LIMES AND LEMONS ORIGIN FROM NUCLEAR AND CYTOPLASMIC MARKERS GENOTYPING AND TARGETED NUCLEAR GENE SEQUENCING

It is believed that Citrus medica, C. maxima, C. reticulata and C. micrantha have generated all cultivated citrus species. Depending on the classification, lemons and limes are classified either into two species, C. limon and C. aurantifolia (Swingle and Reece, 1967) or into more than 30 (Tanaka, 1977). In order to study the molecular phylogeny of this citrus group, we analyzed 23 targeted sequenced nuclear genes and used three mitochondrial and five chloroplastic markers for 15 lemons and limes compared with representatives of the four basic taxa. We observed three main groups, each one derived from direct interspecific hybridizations: (1) the Mexican lime group (C. aurantifolia), including C. macrophylla, arising from hybridizations between papeda (C. micrantha) and citron (C. medica); (2) the yellow lemon group (C. limon) that are hybrids between sour orange (C. aurantium, which is believed to be a hybrid between C. maxima and C. reticulata) and citron; and (3) a rootstock lemon/lime group (Rough lemon and Rangpur lime) that are hybrids between an acid mandarin and a citron. We also identified different probable backcrosses and genotypes with more complex origin. None of the analyzed limes and lemons shared the C. medica cytoplasm, while this taxon is the common nuclear contributor of all limes and lemons. Limes and lemons appear to be a very complex citrus varietal group with the contribution of the 4 basic taxa. Neither the Swingle and Reece classification nor the Tanaka fit with the genetic evidence

Traditional Foods as a Way to Preserve the Genetic Diversity of the Grapevine (Vitis spp.) in Tunisia

Tunisia has a long tradition of viticulture, and the grapevine is used for a variety of traditional foods. The country has traditional plant-based dishes, which may have different compositions and names depending on the region of origin. Unfortunately, over the years, traditional preparations are no longer as popular as they used to be, due to both changing lifestyles and the introduction of new crops and foods. For example, the use of grapevine in traditional dishes has declined as traditions have been lost and habits have changed in favor of new, ready-to-eat foods. The close link between grapevine, culture and territory requires an appropriate evaluation and characterization of traditional foods in order to enhance and extend their use, ensure their sustainability and preserve the varieties used to produce them. This review analyzes the use of local grapevine varieties in different traditional dishes as a means to preserve an invaluable natural and cultural resource and heritage