1,104 research outputs found

    Lattrigen VI-Riedstation. Siedlungsplan und Baugeschichte eines neolithischen Dorfes

    Get PDF
    In der Publikation werden Befund und Baugeschichte der mit einer Tauchgrabung vollständig dokumentierten Seeufersiedlung Lattrigen Riedstation VI vorgestellt. Die Baugeschichte dieser Siedlung lässt sich dank der Dendrochronologie lückenlos verfolgen

    Joint research in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. International archaeological-palaeoecological collaboration within the Beyond Lakes Villages project 2015-2018

    Get PDF
    The prehistoric lakeside settlements in the area of present-day Switzerland, Germany and Austria have been known for more than 150 years. Neolithic and Bronze Ages sites North of the Alps cover a time-span between 4300 and 800 BC. More than one hundred of them were declared UNESCO World Heritage Sites in 2011. Up to now, research has focused almost exclusively on the classical sites on the larger pre-alpine lakes (Lake Constance, Lake Zurich, Three-Lakes-region, Lake Geneva). The focus of the project „Beyond lake villages: Studying Neolithic environmental changes and human impact at small lakes in Switzerland, Germany and Austria „, on the other hand, is located on small lakes (Lakes Burgäschisee and Moossee in the Swiss Plateau, lakes Degersee/Schleinsee in the German Allgäu and Mondsee lake in the Austrian Salzkammergut) and its immediate surroundings in order to gain new insights into the human influence on the landscape and the interaction between prehistoric societies and their environment

    Zwischen Ägäis und Adria. Forschungen zu den Seeufersiedlungen des südlichen Balkans.

    Get PDF
    Das Grenzgebiet von Albanien, Griechenland und Nordmazedonien bildet eine montane Landschaft mit zahlreichen eingestreuten grossen und kleinen Seen. Schon seit längerem ist bekannt, dass hier mit Seeufersiedlungen wie im Alpenraum zu rechnen ist. Moderne Untersuchungen finden aber erst seit 2019 statt (Projekt EXPLO: Exploring the dynamics and causes of prehistoric land use change in the cradle of European farming). Ziel dieses interdisziplinären Verbundprojekts der Universitäten Bern, Oxford und Thessaloniki ist die Klärung von Fragen zur Verbreitung und Chronologie der Fundstellen zwischen dem 6. und dem 1. Jahrtausend v.Chr., zur Landnutzung früher agrarischer Gemeinschaften und zur holozänen Vegetationsgeschichte. Die archäologischen Untersuchungen fokussieren auf Unterwasserausgrabungen im Ohridsee, den Aufbau einer Dendrochronologie für die Region und die finale Auswertung der äusserst reichen Fundstelle von Dispilio am griechischen Kastoriasee. Die paläoökologischen Arbeiten basieren auf zahlreichen neuen on-site und off-site Bohrkernen. Die reichen organischen Schichten der Unterwasser- und Feuchtbodensiedlungen enthalten grosse Mengen an archäo-biologischem Material, das Einblicke in Wirtschaft und Umwelt der frühen agrarischen Gemeinschaften der Region erlaubt. Die Forschungen und Feldarbeiten erfolgen in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Institut für Archäologie der Akademie für Albanologische Studien in Tirana (Albanien), dem Archäologischen Museum von Mazedonien in Skopje (Nordmazedonien) und dem Ephorat von Kastoria, Griechenland. Das EXPLO Projekt wird durch einen Synergy Grant des Europäischen Forschungsrats ERC in den Jahren 2019-2025 gefördert

    Towards a description of the degradation of archaeological birch bark

    Get PDF
    Archaeological birch-bark artefacts from ice patches are rare and little knowledge about their conservation exists. The degradation mechanisms are unknown and it is uncertain how they affect the mechanical properties and the cell structure. Due to this lack of knowledge, the treatments for archaeological birch-bark artefacts usually mimic those for waterlogged wood, which are tuned to the preservation condition of the object. This is assessed by measuring the maximum water content and, in some cases, the basic density and by microscopic examination of microscopic examination. In this paper, it is explored whether these parameters and techniques can be used to characterise the degradation of archaeological birch bark. Light microscopy examinations showed that cell wall deformations and fractures were present in both unaged reference material and archaeological birch bark and are not a distinct attribute of degradation. Cell collapse was not detected in ice-logged samples, while loss of birefringence is a potential tool to characterise degradation. Birch bark cells cannot be saturated with water, not even in the case of waterlogged archaeological samples. The authors conclude that maximum water content is not a diagnostic tool to quantify degradation

    Assessing the Development of Apprentice Principals in Traditional and Residency Programs

    Get PDF
    AbstractProblem Statement and Purpose: Assessing the development of apprentice principals’ knowledge and skills is challenging. The purpose of the study is to compare the outcomes of apprentice principals in a traditional training program and in an alternative residency program.Research Methods: Researchers conducted a survey of current administrative students and a survey of graduates of both the traditional educational administration program and of the alternative residency principal program. They collected self-report data and job status data.Findings: Findings showed that students in the residency program were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their program and were significantly more likely to report being knowledgeable in their field, compared with students in the traditional program. Graduates of residency programs were more likely than traditional graduates to report that their primary job status was “teacher leader”, assistant principal or principal, compared with traditional graduates.Conclusions: Findings will inform the ongoing development of the educational leadership program at the university. It can also inform faculty from other educational leadership programs who seek to develop transformational leaders

    Central European Early Bronze Age chronology revisited: A Bayesian examination of large-scale radiocarbon dating

    Get PDF
    In archaeological research, changes in material culture and the evolution of styles are taken as major indicators for socio-cultural transformation. They form the basis for typo-chronological classification and the establishment of phases and periods. Central European Bronze Age material culture from burials reveals changes during the Bronze Age and represents a perfect case study for analyzing phenomena of cultural change and the adoption of innovation in the societies of prehistoric Europe. Our study focuses on the large-scale change in material culture which took place in the second millennium BC and the emergence at the same period of new burial rites: the shift from inhumation burials in flat graves to complex mounds and simple cremation burials. Paul Reinecke was the first to divide the European Bronze Age (EBA) into two phases, Bz A1 and A2. The shift from the first to the second phase has so far been ascribed to technical advances. Our study adopted an innovative approach to quantifying this phenomenon. Through regressive reciprocal averaging and Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon-dated grave contexts located in Switzerland and southern Germany, we modelled chronological changes in the material culture and changes in burial rites in these regions in a probabilistic way. We used kernel density models to summarize radiocarbon dates, with the aim of visualizing cultural changes in the third and second millennium BC. In 2015, Stockhammer et al. cast doubt on the chronological sequence of the Reinecke phases of the EBA on the basis of newly collected radiocarbon dates from southern Germany. Our intervention is a direct response to the results of that study. We fully agree with Stockhammer’s et al. dating of the start of EBA, but propose a markedly different dating of the EBA/MBA transition. Our modelling of radiocarbon data demonstrates a statistically significant typological sequence of phases Bz A1, Bz A2 and Bz B and disproves their postulated chronological overlap. The linking of the archaeological relative-chronological system with absolute dates is of major importance to understanding the temporal dimension of the EBA phases

    Das Neolithikum in der Schweiz

    Get PDF
    Neolithic research in Switzerland is inseparably bound with its numerous lake side settlements. They were already discovered in the middle of the 19th century and became famous as „Pfahlbauten“. The concept of Neolithic Cultures that was developed in the 1930’s by Emil Vogt was undoubtedly influenced by contemporaneous ethnological thinking („Kulturkreislehre“). In his publications Vogt expresses the conviction that „Neolithic Cultures“ are identical with population groups, tribes or peoples. As modern methods of absolute datings did not exist at that time his observations were dependant on typological comparisons. Most importantly, he could not differentiate chronological gaps of several hundred years. Without natural scientific dating methods and relying solely on topography he developed the view that the evolution of ceramics in a region can only be explained by the immigration of foreign people. His proposed chronological chart, which was updated in the 1960/70’s, is still in use today. However, in our opinion it is antiquated.During the last two decades dendrochronology and C14 has offered a large number of absolute datings for the Neolithic period. This encourages us to follow new approaches of interpretation. Our concept is based on the well dated material of lake side settlements from Switzerland and Southern Germany. We propose a new time/space regionally defined chronological system that is primarily based on absolute dating taking also into consideration that different geographic regions show different evolutions. The idea of Neolithic „Cultures“ and associate folk behind them is abandoned and replaced by the neutral notion of „specific groupings of material finds („Fundkomplexgruppen“). Our proposed overview of the Neolithic in Switzerland elucidates more the gradual evolution of the archaeological material («Kulturwandel») in the 4th millennium BC on theSwiss Plateau. Influences reach this zone variably from Western or Eastern directions depending on the historic period of time we are looking at. The appearance of the Europe-wide discernible beaker phenomena (corded ware/bell beakers) in the 3rd millennium BC also calls for new models of explanation

    Recent Decisions

    Get PDF
    Comments on recent decisions by Louis Albert Hafner, Patrick F. Coughlin, George J. Murphy, Benedict R. Danko, John E. Lindberg, William J. O\u27Connor, Mark Harry Berens, Joseph M. Gaydos, William G. Greif, Lawrence S. May, Jr., Charles James Perrin, Arthur L. Beaudette, F. Richard Kramer, Kenneth N. Obrecht, William T. Huston, and Maurice J. Moriarty

    Neolithic and Bronze Age archery equipment from alpine ice-patches: A review on components, construction techniques and functionality

    Get PDF
    The alpine ice-patch sites of Tisenjoch (I), Schnidejoch and Loetschenpass (CH) brought to light the most complete archery equipments known from the European Prehistory. Bows were simple self bows made from yew (Taxus baccata) or elm wood (Ulmus sp.) of different types, but always of man-tall size. The manufacturing process can be described from several finds of unfinished bow blanks, as in the case of the Tisenjoch. Neolithic arrows were made from shoots of hazel (Corylus avellana), guelder rose (Viburnum sp.) or other hardwoods. They were straightened by heat and generally longer and thicker as modern sporting arrows for increased weight and penetration power. Their fletching of three split feathers was practically the same as it is still used today. Bowstrings are extremely rare in European archaeological sites, only two assured samples are known to date, coming from the Tisenjoch and the Schnidejoch ice-patches. They were made from animal sinew fibres which will not be preserved in non-frozen sites. Although there almost certainly was a need for a protective cover of the bow against bad weather, there is only one example of a Neolithic bow case known to date. The cover, made from water resistant birch bark and a little longer as the bow which was carried inside, was found on Schnidejoch. It incorporates a carrying system of leather straps which enabled the user to wear it over the shoulder, keeping the hands free for other tasks. It is supposed that other bow cases which very probably existed in the neolithic, were made from animal hide or leather which would not survive in waterlogged sites. That there were protective carrying devices for archery gear is testified by the leather arrow quiver found on Tisenjoch and by numerous ethnographic and historic examples
    • …
    corecore