Improve implementation of a novel paediatric therapy programme : taking theories of human behaviour into account

Background: ‘COPing with and CAring for Infants with special Needs’ (COPCA) is a novel family-centred early intervention programme in paediatric physiotherapy. COPCA differs from well-known approaches, e.g. the therapist takes on the role of a coach and uses hands-off approaches. This implies, that to become a COPCA-coach, the therapist needs to change behaviour. Thus, it may be assumed that for successful implementation of new approaches, theories of human behaviour have to be taken into account. Purpose: The study aims to measure behaviour changes in therapists following a COPCA course in order to identify the challenges that interfere with the implementation of the COPCA program in daily practice. Methods: Data were collected during a three-part COPCA course over 6 months (with two months intervals between parts) in which 15 therapists learned to become a COPCA-coach. To document behaviour changes four treatment sessions (one prior to part I T0), one in each interval (T1, T2), and one after part III (T3) of each participant (n=60) were video-recorded and analysed quantitatively with the Groningen Observation Protocol version 2 (GOP 2.0). The videos were randomized and masked to the chronology of recording moment. GOP 2.0 is a quantitative tool to assess therapeutic behaviour in different categories, e.g. “educational actions toward caregivers” or “neuromotor actions”. It allows for a quantification of the relative duration of therapeutic actions (percentage of total treatment time) during a session. Interrater reliability of the GOP 2.0 was evaluated. The first author analysed changes in therapeutic behaviour over time with the Wilcox-sign rank test. Median changes and corresponding non-parametric confidence intervals were computed using the Hodges-Lehmann estimator (HL). Results: Interrater reliability of the GOP 2.0 (ICC2) was 0.48-1.00 (median 0.92). Course participation was associated especially with changes in “educational actions toward caregivers” and “ neuromotor actions”. Time spent on ‘caregiver coaching’ increased: between T0 and T1 by 77.9% (99% confidence interval (CI) 48.7-99.1) and between T0 and T3 by 96.1% (99%CI 51.7-100). Also time spent on hands-off techniques increased, 37.9% (99%CI 18.8-59.5) between T0 and T1 and 40.3% (99%CI 17.8-57.7) between T0 and T3. The implementation of hands-off approaches developed at a slower rate and somewhat less sustainable than that of coaching. Conclusions: Behaviours with a slower and less sustainable rate of change represented strong habits. The neural substrate of strong habits is located subcortically, making them relatively resistant to cognitive input. To overcome this challenge, future COPCA courses need to be adapted, by including (1) more modelling of desired behaviour and (2) more repetition and practice for the behaviours in the neuromotor domain. Implication: Quantitative analysis of therapeutic behaviour is a useful method to monitor changes in behaviour of therapists and – by doing so – may assist the implementation of new approaches. To implement new approaches successfully, theories of human behaviour have to be taken into account. The Behaviour Change Wheel of Michie et al., a method to characterise and design behaviour change in interventions, is a helpful framework to understand the nature of behaviour and to overcome behaviour change barriers

Prescription of the first prosthesis and later use in children with congenital unilateral upper limb deficiency: A systematic review

Background: The prosthetic rejection rates in children with an upper limb transversal reduction deficiency are considerable. It is unclear whether the timing of the first prescription of the prosthesis contributes to the rejection rates. Objective: To reveal whether scientific evidence is available in literature to confirm the hypothesis that the first prosthesis of children with an upper limb deficiency should be prescribed before two years of age. We expect lower rejection rates and better functional outcomes in children fitted at young age. Methods: A computerized search was performed in several databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Amed, Psycinfo, PiCarta and the Cochrane database). A combination of the following keywords and their synonyms was used: "prostheses, upper limb, upper extremity, arm and congenital''. Furthermore, references of conference reports, references of most relevant studies, citations of most relevant studies and related articles were checked for relevancy. Results: The search yielded 285 publications, of which four studies met the selection criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was low. All studies showed a trend of lower rejection rates in children who were provided with their first prosthesis at less than two years of age. The pooled odds ratio of two studies showed a higher rejection rate in children who were fitted over two years of age ( pooled OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6-8.0). No scientific evidence was found concerning the relation between the age at which a prosthesis was prescribed for the first time and functional outcomes. Conclusion: In literature only little evidence was found for a relationship between the fitting of a first prosthesis in children with a congenital upper limb deficiency and rejection rates or functional outcomes. As such, clinical practice of the introduction of a prosthesis is guided by clinical experience rather than by evidence-based medicine

Human face and gaze perception is highly context specific and involves bottom-up and top-down neural processing

This review summarizes human perception and processing of face and gaze signals. Face and gaze signals are important means of non-verbal social communication. The review highlights that: (1) some evidence is available suggesting that the perception and processing of facial information starts in the prenatal period; (2) the perception and processing of face identity, expression and gaze direction is highly context specific, the effect of race and culture being a case in point. Culture affects by means of experiential shaping and social categorization the way in which information on face and gaze is collected and perceived; (3) face and gaze processing occurs in the so-called 'social brain'. Accumulating evidence suggests that the processing of facial identity, facial emotional expression and gaze involves two parallel and interacting pathways: a fast and crude subcortical route and a slower cortical pathway. The flow of information is bi-directional and includes bottom-up and top-down processing. The cortical networks particularly include the fusiform gyrus, superior temporal sulcus (STS), intraparietal sulcus, temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex

Early Diagnostics and Early Intervention in Neurodevelopmental Disorders-Age-Dependent Challenges and Opportunities

This review discusses early diagnostics and early intervention in developmental disorders in the light of brain development. The best instruments for early detection of cerebral palsy (CP) with or without intellectual disability are neonatal magnetic resonance imaging, general movements assessment at 2-4 months and from 2-4 months onwards, the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination and Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment. Early detection of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is difficult; its first signs emerge at the end of the first year. Prediction with the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and Infant Toddler Checklist is possible to some extent and improves during the second year, especially in children at familial risk of ASD. Thus, prediction improves substantially when transient brain structures have been replaced by permanent circuitries. At around 3 months the cortical subplate has dissolved in primary motor and sensory cortices; around 12 months the cortical subplate in prefrontal and parieto-temporal cortices and cerebellar external granular layer have disappeared. This review stresses that families are pivotal in early intervention. It summarizes evidence on the effectiveness of early intervention in medically fragile neonates, infants at low to moderate risk, infants with or at high risk of CP and with or at high risk of ASD