Prioritization strategies for pandemic influenza vaccine in 27 countries of the European Union and the Global Health Security Action Group: a review

Background: Although there is rapid progress in vaccine research regarding influenza pandemic vaccines it is expected that pandemic influenza vaccine production can only start once the pandemic virus has been recognized. Therefore, pandemic vaccine capacity will be limited at least during the first phase of an influenza pandemic, requiring vaccine prioritization strategies. WHO recommends developing preliminary priorities for pandemic vaccine use. The goal of this review is to provide a thorough overview of pandemic vaccine prioritization concepts in the 27 European Union (EU) member states and the four non-EU countries of the Global Health Security Action Group. Methods: Between September and December 2006 data was collected for each country through two data sources: (i) the national influenza pandemic plan; (ii) contacting key persons involved in pandemic planning by email and/or phone and/or fax Results: Twenty-six (84%) countries had established at least one vaccine priority group. Most common reported vaccine priority groups were health care workers (HCW) (100%), essential service providers (ESP) (92%) and high risk individuals (HRI) (92%). Ranking of at least one vaccine priority group was done by 17 (65%) of 26 countries. Fifteen (88%) of these 17 countries including a ranking strategy, decided that HCW with close contact to influenza patients should be vaccinated first; in most countries followed and/or ranked equally by ESP and subsequently HRI. Rationales for prioritization were provided by 22 (85%) of 26 countries that established vaccine priority groups. There was large variation in the phrasing and level of detailed specification of rationales. Seven (32%) of 22 countries providing rationales clearly associated each vaccine priority group with the specific rationale. Ten (32% of the 31 countries studied) countries have consulted and involved ethical experts to guide decisions related to vaccine prioritization. Conclusion: In the majority of the countries the establishment of vaccine priority groups, ranking and underlying rationales are in line with WHO recommendations. In most public plans the criteria by which prioritized groups are identified are not easily recognizable. Clarity however, may be necessary to assure public acceptability of the prioritization. Ethical experts, results of modelling exercises could play an increasing role in the future decision making process

Should HLA and HPA-matched platelet transfusions for patients with Glanzmann Thrombasthenia or Bernard-Soulier syndrome be standardized care? A Dutch survey and recommendations

Background: Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) and Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) patients require frequent platelet transfusions and hence have an increased risk for alloimmunization against donor Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) when no HLA-matching is performed. Knowing that Human Platelet Antigens (HPA) are located on the platelet glycoproteins that can be absent in these patients, preventive HPA-matching may also be considered. Uniform recommendations on this topic lack in transfusion guidelines making standard practice unclear, therefore, we aimed to provide a framework for matched platelet transfusions. Study Design and Methods: We conducted a targeted literature search and a national survey of Dutch (pediatric) hematologists from July to September 2021. Results: We found 20 articles describing platelet transfusion policies in 483 GT-patients and 29 BSS-patients, both adults and children. Twenty surveys were returned for full analysis. All responders treated patients with platelet disorders, including GT (n = 36 reported) and BSS (n = 29 reported). Of respondents, 75% estimated the risk of antibody formation as “likely” for HLA and 65% for HPA. Formation of HLA antibodies was reported in 5 GT and in 5 BSS-patients, including one child. Fifteen respondents gave preventive HLA-matched platelets in elective setting (75%). Three respondents additionally matched for HPA in GT-patients (15%). Main argument for matched platelet transfusions was preventing alloimmunization to safeguard the effectivity of ‘random’ donor-platelets in acute settings. Conclusion: Elective HLA-matching for GT and BSS-patients is already conducted by most Dutch (pediatric) hematologists. HPA-matching is mainly applied when HPA-antibodies are formed. Based on the current literature and the survey, recommendations are proposed.</p

Severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia; epidemiology, clinical management, outcomes and knowledge gaps

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an acquired hemolytic disorder, mediated by auto-antibodies, and has a variable clinical course ranging from fully compensated low grade hemolysis to severe life-threatening cases. The rarity, heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of severe AIHA complicate the recognition and management of severe cases. In this review, we describe how severe AIHA can be defined and what is currently known of the severity and outcome of AIHA. There are no validated predictors for severe clinical course, but certain risk factors for poor outcomes (hospitalisation, transfusion need and mortality) can aid in recognizing severe cases. Some serological subtypes of AIHA (warm AIHA with complement positive DAT, mixed, atypical) are associated with lower hemoglobin levels, higher transfusion need and mortality. Currently, there is no evidence-based therapeutic approach for severe AIHA. We provide a general approach for the management of severe AIHA patients, incorporating monitoring, supportive measures and therapeutic options based on expert opinion. In cases where steroids fail, there is a lack of rapidly effective therapeutic options. In this era, numerous novel therapies are emerging for AIHA, including novel complement inhibitors, such as sutimlimab. Their potential in severe AIHA is discussed. Future research efforts are needed to gain a clearer picture of severe AIHA and develop prediction models for severe disease course. It is crucial to incorporate not only clinical characteristics but also biomarkers that are associated with pathophysiological differences and severity, to enhance the accuracy of prediction models and facilitate the selection of the optimal therapeutic approach. Future clinical trials should prioritize the inclusion of severe AIHA patients, particularly in the quest for rapidly acting novel agents

Anti-glycoprotein antibodies and sequestration pattern of indium-labeled platelets in immune thrombocytopenia

Antiglycoprotein (anti-GP) antibodies play an important role in the pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The sequestration pattern of platelets in the spleen and liver can be studied with (111)In-labeled autologous platelet scans. No studies have investigated the role of anti-GP antibodies in sequestration patterns in ITP patients. In this study, we examined the association between antibodies and (1) platelet sequestration site and (2) clearance rate of platelets. All ITP patients receiving an (111)In-labeled autologous platelet study between 2014 and 2018 were included. Antibodies were measured using the direct MAIPA method to determine the presence and titer of anti-GPIIb/IIIa, anti-GPIb/IX, and anti-GPV antibodies. Multivariate regression models were used to study the association between anti-GP antibodies, sequestration site, and clearance rate. Seventy-four patients were included, with a mean age of 36 years. Forty-seven percent of the patients showed a predominantly splenic sequestration pattern, 29% mixed, and 25% a hepatic pattern. In 53% of the patients, anti-GP antibodies were detected. Regression models showed a significant association between splenic sequestration and GPV autoantibodies. Furthermore, in patients where antibodies were present, the clearance rate was higher in patients with a splenic sequestration. Anti-GPV antibodies are associated with a splenic sequestration pattern in ITP patients. These associations provide insight into the possible pathophysiological mechanisms of ITP, which may lead to better detection and treatment of this partly idiopathic and prevalent disease

Should HLA and HPA-matched platelet transfusions for patients with Glanzmann Thrombasthenia or Bernard-Soulier syndrome be standardized care? A Dutch survey and recommendations

Background: Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) and Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) patients require frequent platelet transfusions and hence have an increased risk for alloimmunization against donor Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) when no HLA-matching is performed. Knowing that Human Platelet Antigens (HPA) are located on the platelet glycoproteins that can be absent in these patients, preventive HPA-matching may also be considered. Uniform recommendations on this topic lack in transfusion guidelines making standard practice unclear, therefore, we aimed to provide a framework for matched platelet transfusions. Study Design and Methods: We conducted a targeted literature search and a national survey of Dutch (pediatric) hematologists from July to September 2021. Results: We found 20 articles describing platelet transfusion policies in 483 GT-patients and 29 BSS-patients, both adults and children. Twenty surveys were returned for full analysis. All responders treated patients with platelet disorders, including GT (n = 36 reported) and BSS (n = 29 reported). Of respondents, 75% estimated the risk of antibody formation as “likely” for HLA and 65% for HPA. Formation of HLA antibodies was reported in 5 GT and in 5 BSS-patients, including one child. Fifteen respondents gave preventive HLA-matched platelets in elective setting (75%). Three respondents additionally matched for HPA in GT-patients (15%). Main argument for matched platelet transfusions was preventing alloimmunization to safeguard the effectivity of ‘random’ donor-platelets in acute settings. Conclusion: Elective HLA-matching for GT and BSS-patients is already conducted by most Dutch (pediatric) hematologists. HPA-matching is mainly applied when HPA-antibodies are formed. Based on the current literature and the survey, recommendations are proposed.</p

The interplay between GPIb/IX antibodies, platelet hepatic sequestration, and TPO levels in patients with chronic ITP

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with an incompletely understood pathophysiology but includes platelet-clearance in the spleen and liver via T cells and/or platelet autoantibodies. Strikingly, thrombopoietin (TPO) levels remain low in ITP. Platelet-glycoprotein (GP)Ibα has been described to be required for hepatic TPO generation; however, the role of GPIb antibodies in relation to platelet hepatic sequestration and TPO levels, with consideration of platelet counts, remains to be elucidated. Therefore, we examined 53 patients with chronic and nonsplenectomized ITP for whom we conducted indium-labeled autologous platelet scintigraphy and measured platelet antibodies and TPO levels. Upon stratification toward the severity of thrombocytopenia, no negative association was observed between GPIb/IX antibodies and TPO levels, suggesting that GPIb/IX antibodies do not inhibit or block TPO levels. Surprisingly, we observed a positive association between GPIb/IX antibody levels and TPO levels and GPIb/IX antibodies and platelet hepatic sequestration in patients with severe, but not mild or moderate, thrombocytopenia. In addition, platelet hepatic sequestration and TPO levels were positively associated. This collectively indicates that GPIb/IX antibodies may be associated with increased platelet hepatic sequestration and elevated TPO levels in patients with severe thrombocytopenic ITP; however, further research is warranted to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms.</p