Absolute quantitative total-body small-animal SPECT with focusing pinholes

Purpose: In pinhole SPECT, attenuation of the photon flux on trajectories between source and pinholes affects quantitative accuracy of reconstructed images. Previously we introduced iterative methods that compensate for image degrading effects of detector and pinhole blurring, pinhole sensitivity and scatter for multi-pinhole SPECT. The aim of this paper is (1) to investigate the accuracy of the Chang algorithm in rodents and (2) to present a practical Changbased method using body outline contours obtained with optical cameras. Methods: Here we develop and experimentally validate a practical method for attenuation correction based on a Chang first-order method. This approach has the advantage that it is employed after, and therefore independently from, iterative reconstruction. Therefore, no new system matrix has to be calculated for each specific animal. Experiments with phantoms and animals were performed with a highresolution focusing multi-pinhole SPECT system (USPECT-II, MILabs, The Netherlands). This SPECT system provides three additional optical camera images of the animal for each SPECT scan from which the animal contour can be estimated. Results: Phantom experiments demonstrated that an average quantification error of –18.7% was reduced to –1.7% when both window-based scatter correction and Chang correction based on the body outline from optical images were applied. Without scatter and attenuation correction, quantification errors in a sacrificed rat containing sources with known activity ranged from –23.6 to –9.3%. These errors were reduced to values between –6.3 and +4.3% (with an average magnitude of 2.1%) after applying scatter and Chang attenuation correction. Conclusion: We conclude that the modified Chang correction based on body contour combined with window-based scatter correction is a practical method for obtaining small-animal SPECT images with high quantitative accuracy.Radiation, Radionuclides and ReactorsApplied Science

Effect of prolonged acquisition intervals for CT-perfusion analysis methods in patients with ischemic stroke

Introduction: The limited axial coverage of many computed tomography (CT) scanners poses a high risk on false negative findings in cerebral CT-perfusion (CTP) imaging. Axial coverage may be increased by moving the table back and forth during image acquisition. However, this method often increases the acquisition interval between CT frames, which may influence the CTP analysis. In this study, we evaluated the influence of different acquisition intervals on quantitative perfusion maps and infarct volumes by analyzing patient data with three CTP analysis methods. Methods: CT-perfusion data from 25 patients with ischemic stroke were used for this study. The acquisition interval was synthetically reduced from 1 to 5 s before calculating perfusion values, which included cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT). The color scaling of the perfusion was scaled such that the mean perfusion value had the same color-coding as the mean perfusion in the 1 s reference. Also, infarct core and penumbra volumes (summary map) were calculated using default thresholds of CBV and relative MTT (rMTT). The original, 1 s acquisition interval scan served as the reference standard. A commercial block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD) based method (ISP; Philips Healthcare), a non-commercial bSVD method, and a non-linear regression (NLR) model-based method were evaluated. Results: Cerebral blood volume values generated with bSVD and NLR were not significantly different from the reference standard, while ISP showed significant differences for acquisition intervals of 3 and 4 s. MTT and CBF values generated with bSVD and ISP were significantly different for all acquisition intervals, whereas NLR did not show any significant differences. Calibrated perfusion maps were able to distinguish healthy from infarcted tissue up to an acquisition interval of 5 s for all methods. The infarct core volumes were significantly different for acquisition intervals of 2 (NLR) and 3 s (bSVD and ISP) or greater. For the penumbra volumes, NLR showed no significant differences, while bSVD and ISP showed significant differences for the 5 s interval and for all intervals, respectively. Visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals of 4 s or less (ISP) and 5 s or less (bSVD and NLR). Conclusion: Altering the acquisition interval may introduce a bias in the perfusion parameters. Calibration of the visualization of the perfusion maps with increasing acquisition intervals allowed distinction between healthy and infarcted tissue. Infarct volumes based on relative MTT can be influenced by the acquisition interval, but visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals up to 4 (ISP) and 5 s (bSVD and NLR). Taken together, axial coverage can be increased by prolonging the acquisition interval up to 5 s depending on the perfusion analysis

Effect of prolonged acquisition intervals for CT-perfusion analysis methods in patients with ischemic stroke

Introduction: The limited axial coverage of many computed tomography (CT) scanners poses a high risk on false negative findings in cerebral CT-perfusion (CTP) imaging. Axial coverage may be increased by moving the table back and forth during image acquisition. However, this method often increases the acquisition interval between CT frames, which may influence the CTP analysis. In this study, we evaluated the influence of different acquisition intervals on quantitative perfusion maps and infarct volumes by analyzing patient data with three CTP analysis methods. Methods: CT-perfusion data from 25 patients with ischemic stroke were used for this study. The acquisition interval was synthetically reduced from 1 to 5 s before calculating perfusion values, which included cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT). The color scaling of the perfusion was scaled such that the mean perfusion value had the same color-coding as the mean perfusion in the 1 s reference. Also, infarct core and penumbra volumes (summary map) were calculated using default thresholds of CBV and relative MTT (rMTT). The original, 1 s acquisition interval scan served as the reference standard. A commercial block-circulant singular value decomposition (bSVD) based method (ISP; Philips Healthcare), a non-commercial bSVD method, and a non-linear regression (NLR) model-based method were evaluated. Results: Cerebral blood volume values generated with bSVD and NLR were not significantly different from the reference standard, while ISP showed significant differences for acquisition intervals of 3 and 4 s. MTT and CBF values generated with bSVD and ISP were significantly different for all acquisition intervals, whereas NLR did not show any significant differences. Calibrated perfusion maps were able to distinguish healthy from infarcted tissue up to an acquisition interval of 5 s for all methods. The infarct core volumes were significantly different for acquisition intervals of 2 (NLR) and 3 s (bSVD and ISP) or greater. For the penumbra volumes, NLR showed no significant differences, while bSVD and ISP showed significant differences for the 5 s interval and for all intervals, respectively. Visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals of 4 s or less (ISP) and 5 s or less (bSVD and NLR). Conclusion: Altering the acquisition interval may introduce a bias in the perfusion parameters. Calibration of the visualization of the perfusion maps with increasing acquisition intervals allowed distinction between healthy and infarcted tissue. Infarct volumes based on relative MTT can be influenced by the acquisition interval, but visual inspection of the summary maps indicated minor differences between the reference standard and acquisition intervals up to 4 (ISP) and 5 s (bSVD and NLR). Taken together, axial coverage can be increased by prolonging the acquisition interval up to 5 s depending on the perfusion analysis

Dose of CT protocols acquired in clinical routine using a dual-layer detector CT scanner: A preliminary report

Purpose To assess the radiation dose associated with always-on dual-energy acquisitions in clinical practice over a broad range of clinical protocols using a dual-layer detector CT (DLCT; IQon spectral CT, Philips Healthcare) as compared to an otherwise technically equivalent single-layer detector CT (SLCT; Brilliance iCT, Philips healthcare). Materials and Methods Dose-length-product data for consecutive examinations over a six-month period acquired with DLCT were retrospectively collected and compared to consecutive examinations from an SLCT. Imaging protocols were optimized for diagnostic image quality for each system prior to data collection. Dose reports of CT protocols that were used at least 50 times on both systems were collected. After exclusion of statistical outliers, protocols were evaluated with regard to reported dose levels. Results In total, 4536 dose reports for DLCT and 5783 reports for SLCT were collected. All DLCT examinations were acquired at 120 kVp, enabling dual-energy analysis. With SLCT, 79% of examinations were acquired at 120 kVp, and 21% at 100/80 kVp. Protocols for 15 indications were used more than 50 times on both scanners. For seven protocols there was no significant difference between the two scanners (p > 0.05), whereas seven protocols were acquired with higher dose levels on SLCT compared to the DLCT (p < 0.03). For one protocol, the DLCT dose was significantly higher (p < 0.005) compared to the SLCT. Conclusion Dual-layer detector CT enables acquisition of dual-energy information over a broad range of clinical indications without increasing radiation dose when compared to a conventional single-layer detector CT