Preclinical evaluation of the cardiac toxicity of HMR-1826, a novel prodrug of doxorubicin

Cardiotoxicity represents the major side-effect limiting the clinical use of anthracyclines, especially doxorubicin, in cancer chemotherapy. The use of non-toxic prodrugs, or of liposome-encapsulated drugs, allows a better targeting of the tumours and may, therefore, improve the tolerance to the treatment. Using the model of isolated perfused rat heart, we have evaluated the cardiotoxicity of a novel prodrug of doxorubicin, HMR-1826, which consists of the association of doxorubicin to glucuronic acid. We have compared the cardiac effects (developed pressure, contractility and relaxation of the left ventricle) induced by HMR-1826 to those induced by doxorubicin and Doxil, a liposomal form of doxorubicin. HMR-1826 was administered intravenously every other day for 11 days at doses of 50–200 mg kg−1 per injection while doxorubicin was administered according to the same protocol at doses of 1–3 mg kg−1 per injection. Doxorubicin strongly decreased the cardiac functional parameters at the doses of 2.5 and 3 mg kg−1 per injection. Doxil (3 mg kg−1) and HMR-1826 (50–150 mg kg−1) were largely devoid of cardiotoxicity. HMR-1826 only induced significant alterations of the cardiac function at the highest dose used (200 mg kg−1 per injection). These alterations were much lower than those of doxorubicin at 2.5 mg kg−1 per injection, despite similar general toxicity symptoms (weight loss, nose bleeding and diarrhoea) at these respective doses. Thus, HMR-1826 appeared about 100-fold less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

Tamoxifen: the drug that came in from the cold

Despite the perception of many oncologists that tamoxifen is an inferior drug, and should be substituted by an aromatase inhibitor in post-menopausal women, the current evidence strongly supports the view that AIs should be used 2–3 years after tamoxifen to achieve the maximal overall survival (OS) advantage

Meta-analysis of trials comparing anastrozole and tamoxifen for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objective</p> <p>It was aimed to review the literature and make a meta-analysis of the trials on both upfront, switching, and sequencing anastrozole in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed for randomized-controlled trials comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The combined hazard rate of 4 trials for event-free survival (EFS) was 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70–0.85) (<it>P </it>< 0.0001) for patients treated with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen. In the second analysis in which only ITA, ABCSG 8, and ARNO 95 trials were included and ATAC (upfront trial) was excluded, combined hazard rate for EFS was 0.64 (95%CI: 0.52–0.79) (<it>P </it>< 0.0001). In the third analysis including hazard rate for recurrence-free survival (excluding non-disease related deaths) of estrogen receptor-positive patients for ATAC trial and hazard rate for EFS of all patients for the rest of the trials, combined hazard rate was 0.73 (95%CI: 0.65–0.81) (<it>P </it>< 0.0001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Anastrozole appears to have superior efficacy than tamoxifen in the adjuvant hormonal treatment of early breast cancer. Until further clinical evidence comes up, aromatase inhibitors should be the initial hormonal therapy in postmenopausal early breast cancer patients and switching should only be considered for patients who are currently receiving tamoxifen.</p

Minimizing early relapse and maximizing treatment outcomes in hormone-sensitive postmenopausal breast cancer: efficacy review of AI trials

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in women. Regardless of prognosis, all women with breast cancer are at risk for early recurrence. Nearly 50% of early recurrences occur within 5 years of surgery, and they peak at 2 years after surgery in women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Most early recurrences are distant metastases, which strongly correlate with increased mortality. Treatments that mitigate the risk of early distant metastases (DM) are, therefore, likely to improve overall survival in women with early breast cancer (EBC). Aromatase inhibitors (AIs)—anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane—have been investigated as alternatives to tamoxifen for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) EBC in postmenopausal women (PMW). AIs are better at minimizing risk of early relapse compared with tamoxifen. However, it is not clear if preferential use of AIs over tamoxifen will benefit all PMW with HR+ EBC. The ability to subtype HR+ breast cancer on the basis of biomarkers predictive of response to AIs and tamoxifen would likely be key to determining the most beneficial hormonal treatment within patient subpopulations, but this process requires thorough investigation. Until then, adjuvant therapies that provide the greatest reduction in risk of DM should be considered for all PMW with HR+ EBC. This article reviews the clinical trials of AI adjuvant therapies for hormone-sensitive breast cancer, particularly in the context of how they compare with tamoxifen in minimizing the risk of relapse, occurrence of DM, and breast cancer-related deaths

Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

This phase I was study conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (600 mg m−2, intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (60, 75 or 85 mg m−2, 1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 85 mg m−2 with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m−2, the dose-limiting toxicity being febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by all patients, but was generally brief. Otherwise, the combination was well tolerated with few acute and no chronic non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4. Activity was observed at all dose levels and disease sites, and the overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 22–61%). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not modified by cyclophosphamide coadministration. These findings establish a recommended dose of docetaxel 75 mg m−2 in combination with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m−2 every three weeks for phase II evaluation

Update on the use of aromatase inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer

Aromatase inhibitors are currently included in the 'optimal' management of early-stage breast cancer. Uncertainty remains, however, as to the most appropriate treatment strategy, particularly for newly diagnosed women as they seek to trade off the cost, toxicities and efficacy of the treatment options. Recent publications provide conflicting advice on the role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This review provides updates on the clinical trials of aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer and tries to provide practical clinical guidance on their optimal use

A randomized trial to assess the biological activity of short-term (pre-surgical) fulvestrant 500 mg plus anastrozole versus fulvestrant 500 mg alone or anastrozole alone on primary breast cancer

Introduction: Fulvestrant shows dose-dependent biological activity. Greater estrogen-receptor (ER) blockade may feasibly be achieved by combining fulvestrant with anastrozole. This pre-surgical study compared fulvestrant plus anastrozole versus either agent alone in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: In this double-blind, multicenter trial, 121 patients received: fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 plus anastrozole 1 mg/day for 14-21 days (F+A); fulvestrant plus anastrozole placebo (F); or fulvestrant placebo plus anastrozole (A), 2-3 weeks before surgery. ER, progesterone-receptor (PgR), and Ki67 expression were determined from tumor biopsies before treatment and at surgery. Results: 103 paired samples were available (F, n = 35; F+A, n = 31; A, n = 37). All treatments significantly reduced mean ER expression from baseline (F: 41%, P = 0.0001; F+A: 39%, P = 0.0001; A: 13%, P = 0.0034). F and F+A led to greater reductions in ER versus A (both P = 0.0001); F+A did not lead to additional reductions versus F. PgR and Ki67 expression were significantly reduced with all treatments (means were 34% to 45%, and 75% to 85%, respectively; all P = 0.0001), with no differences between groups. Conclusions: In this short-term study, all treatments reduced ER expression, although F and F+A showed greater reductions than A. No significant differences were detected between the treatment groups in terms of PgR and Ki67 expression. No additional reduction in tumor biomarkers with combination treatment was observed, suggesting that F+A is unlikely to have further clinical benefit over F alone. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00259090