Persistent Yersinia enterocolitica infection in three rat strains.

Contains fulltext : 20841.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory Haemophilus influenzae isolates from pulmonology services over a six-year period

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTI) are frequently caused by Haemophilus influenzae. Widespread antibacterial resistance among respiratory microorganisms complicates empirical RTI treatment. Therefore, national data on antibiotic resistance for H. influenzae are important for guiding optimal antibiotic choice. METHODS: The antibiotic susceptibility of H. influenzae strains isolated from respiratory specimens of patients admitted to the pulmonology services between 2005 and 2010 was assessed. Isolates were collected annually from 13 hospitals in the Netherlands as part of the national intramural antimicrobial resistance surveillance performed by the Dutch Working Group on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB). Breakpoints for resistance were in accordance with the criteria of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Trend analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 1606 H. influenzae strains were analyzed. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, doxycycline, co-trimoxazole, and clarithromycin was stable over the 6-y period, and there was a trend towards a decrease in the prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing isolates. Regarding prevalences, no significant trends were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant changes in antibiotic resistance for H. influenzae isolated at different hospitals in the Netherlands over a 6-y period. Regular surveillance remains important in controlling the prevalence of resistance, since actual resistance data should be taken into account when the choice of an empiric antibiotic is made

In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica isolates from stools of patients in The Netherlands from 1982-1991

Item does not contain fulltex

Selective digestive decontamination in patients in intensivecare

Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) is the most extensively studied method for the prevention of infection in patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Despite 27 prospective randomized studies and six meta-analyses, routine use of SDD is still controversial. In this review, we summarize the available scientific information on effectiveness of SDD in ICU patients. The effects of SDD have been studied in different combinations of the concept, using different antibiotics. Comparison of the individual studies, therefore, is difficult. In most studies, SDD resulted in significant reductions in the number of diagnoses of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia in control groups ranged from 5% to 85%. Moreover, these reductions in incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia in individual studies were not associated with improved patient survival, reductions of duration of ventilation or ICU stay, or reductions in antibiotic use. The numbers of patients studied are too small to determine effects on patient survival. Although two meta-analyses suggested a 20% mortality reduction when using the full concept of SDD (topical and systemic prophylaxis) these results should be interpreted with caution. Formal cost-benefit analyses of SDD have not been performed. SDD is associated with the selection of microorganisms that are intrinsically resistant to the antibiotics used. However, the studies are too small and too short to investigate whether SDD will lead to development of antibiotic resistance. As long as the benefits of SDD (better patient survival, reduction in antibiotic use or improved cost-effectiveness) have not been firmly established, the routine use of SDD for mechanically ventilated patients is not advised