Suicide and probation: A systematic review of the literature

A narrative systematic review was undertaken of the literature concerning the health of people on probation. In this paper, we provide an up-to-date summary of what is known about suicide and suicidal ideation and probation. This includes estimates of prevalence and possible predictors of suicide and suicidal ideation. Searches were conducted on nine databases from January 2000 to May 2017, key journals from 2000 to September 2017, and the grey literature. A total of 5125 papers were identified in the initial electronic searches but after careful double-blind review only one research paper related to this topic met our criteria, although a further 12 background papers were identified which are reported. We conclude that people on probation are a very high risk group for completed suicide, and factors associated with this include drug overdose, mental health problems, and poor physical health. There is a clear need for high quality partnership working between probation and mental health services, and investment in services, to support appropriate responses to suicide risk

Psychopathological dimensions and the clinician's subjective experience

Classical psychopathology highly valued the interaction between clinician and patient, and recent findings have provided preliminary evidence of an association between categorical psychiatric diagnosis and the clinician's subjective experience during the first clinical assessment. To extend these findings, the present study examined the relationship between psychopathological dimensions and clinicians' subjective experiences. The study involved 45 clinicians and 783 patients in several psychiatric inpatient and outpatient units. When they saw a new patient, the clinicians completed the Assessment of Clinician's Subjective Experience questionnaire (ACSE) and the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Scores on five core psychopathological dimensions supported by meta-analytic evidence (Affect, Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms, Activation, Disorganization) were derived from the BPRS. Multivariate analysis revealed that each psychopathological dimension was characterized by a distinct pattern of independent associations with certain aspects of Clinician's Subjective Experience, as measured by the ACSE. This study provided preliminary evidence of significant and theoretically consistent relationships between major psychopathological dimensions and the psychiatrist's subjective experience during the first clinical evaluation. Improving the understanding of intersubjective processes may have important implications for theory, practice, research, and training