Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Study of motivational constructs, learning orientations and goals affecting engineering students' learning process

10.1109/TALE.2014.7062625Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering: Learning for the Future Now, TALE 2014462-46

Primary biventricular repair of atrioventricular septal defects: an analysis of reoperations

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to analyze the factors affecting reoperation after primary biventricular atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) repair.MethodsBetween April 1997 and April 2007, 93 consecutive patients underwent surgery for biventricular correction of AVSD with a median age of 5.8 months (range, 9 days to 68.9 years). Fifty-three patients had complete AVSD, 6 patients had an intermediate type, and 29 patients had partial AVSD; 4 patients had a complete AVSD with associated tetralogy of Fallot, and 1 patient had a complete AVSD with double-outlet right ventricle.ResultsThere was no in-hospital mortality. There were 2 late deaths (2.2%). Forty-three reoperations were performed in 23 patients (24.7%), of which 18 were for repair of significant left atrioventricular valve regurgitation and 8 were mitral valve replacements. Seven patients (7.5%) required insertion of a permanent pacemaker. The overall 5-year freedom from reoperation after AVSD repair was 73.6% ± 4.8%. In the multivariate analysis for complete AVSDs, Down syndrome (p = 0.01) and the presence of right ventricular dominance (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of reoperation. At last follow-up, 76 patients (83.5%) were in New York Heart Association class I, and 68 patients (74.7%) were not taking any heart failure medications. Echocardiographic examination showed absent to mild left atrioventricular valve regurgitation in 76.5%; moderate, in 19.8%; and severe, in 3.7% of patients.ConclusionsDown syndrome and right ventricular dominance are independent predictors of reoperation after complete AVSD repair. Biventricular repair of isolated AVSD with a small left ventricle can be successfully accomplished with no mortality.<br/