Acute diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients: evidence from an international multicenter observational registry (Web-based International Register of Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Wires-T)

Background: Immunocompromised patients with acute diverticulitis are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare clinical presentations, types of treatment, and outcomes between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with acute diverticulitis. Methods: We compared the data of patients with acute diverticulitis extracted from the Web-based International Registry of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (WIRES-T) from January 2018 to December 2021. First, two groups were identified: medical therapy (A) and surgical therapy (B). Each group was divided into three subgroups: nonimmunocompromised (grade 0), mildly to moderately (grade 1), and severely immunocompromised (grade 2). Results: Data from 482 patients were analyzed—229 patients (47.5%) [M:F = 1:1; median age: 60 (24–95) years] in group A and 253 patients (52.5%) [M:F = 1:1; median age: 71 (26–94) years] in group B. There was a significant difference between the two groups in grade distribution: 69.9% versus 38.3% for grade 0, 26.6% versus 51% for grade 1, and 3.5% versus 10.7% for grade 2 (p < 0.00001). In group A, severe sepsis (p = 0.027) was more common in higher grades of immunodeficiency. Patients with grade 2 needed longer hospitalization (p = 0.005). In group B, a similar condition was found in terms of severe sepsis (p = 0.002), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score > 2 (p = 0.0002), and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (p = 0.010). A Hartmann’s procedure is mainly performed in grades 1–2 (p < 0.0001). Major complications increased significantly after a Hartmann’s procedure (p = 0.047). Mortality was higher in the immunocompromised patients (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Immunocompromised patients with acute diverticulitis present with a more severe clinical picture. When surgery is required, immunocompromised patients mainly undergo a Hartmann’s procedure. Postoperative morbidity and mortality are, however, higher in immunocompromised patients, who also require a longer hospital stay

Significant improvement of a clinical training course in physical examination after basic structural changes in the teaching content and methods

Background: Regular student evaluations at the Technical University Munich indicate the necessity for improvement of the clinical examination course. The aim of this study was to examine if targeted measures to restructure and improve a clinical examination course session lead to a higher level of student satisfaction as well as better self-assessment of the acquired techniques of clinical examination.Methods: At three medical departments of the Technical University Munich during the 2010 summer semester, the quantitative results of 49 student evaluations (ratings 1-6, German scholastic grading system) of the clinical examination course were compared for a course before and a course after structured measures for improvement. These measures included structured teaching instructions, handouts and additional material from the Internet.Results: 47 evaluations were completed before and 34 evaluations after the measures for improvement. The measures named above led to a significant improvement of the evaluative ratings in the following areas: short introduction to the topic of each clinical examination course (from 2.4±1.2 to1.7±1.0; p=0.0020) and to basic measures of hygiene (from 3.8±1.9 to 2.5±1.8; p=0.004), structured demonstration of each clinical examination step (from 2.9±1.5 to 1.8±1.0; p=0.001), sufficient practice of each clinical examination step (from 3.1±1.8 to 2.2±1.4; p=0.030) structured feedback on each clinical examination step (from 3.0±1.4 to 2.3±1.0; p=0.0070), use of handouts (from 5.2±1.4 to 1.8±1.4; p<0.001), advice on additional learning material (from 5.0±1.4 to 3.4±2.0; p<0.001), general learning experience (from 2.4±0.9 to 1.9±0.8; p=0.017), and self-assessment of the acquired techniques of clinical examination (from 3.5±1.3 to 2.5±1.1; p<0.01).Conclusion: Structured changes led to significant improvement in the evaluative ratings of a clinical examination course session concerning preparation of the tutors, structure of the course, and confidence in performing physical examinations.Hintergrund: Die regelmäßigen Evaluationen der Studierenden der Technischen Universität München deuten auf einen Verbesserungsbedarf des klinischen Untersuchungskurses hin. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, zu prüfen, ob gezielte Maßnahmen zur Umstrukturierung und Verbesserung eines Untersuchungskurstages zu einer höheren Zufriedenheit der Studierenden und zu einer besseren Selbsteinschätzung der von ihnen erlernten Untersuchungstechniken führen.Methoden: In drei medizinischen Kliniken der Technischen Universität München wurden im Sommersemester 2010 die quantitativen Evaluationsergebnisse (deutsches Schulnotensystem, Noten 1-6) von insgesamt 49 Studierenden von einem Kurstag vor und einem Kurstag nach strukturierten Verbesserungsmaßnahmen des klinischen Untersuchungskurses verglichen. Zum Einsatz kamen strukturierte Instruktion der Dozenten, Handouts und über das Internet verfügbares Zusatzmaterial.Ergebnisse: Es wurden 47 Evaluationsbögen vor und 34 Evaluationsbögen nach den Verbesserungsmaßnahmen ausgefüllt. Die oben genannten Maßnahmen führten zu signifikanten Verbesserungen der Evaluationsnoten in folgenden Bereichen: Einführen ins jeweilige Kursthema (von 2,4±1,2 auf 1,7±1,0, p=0,002) und in hygienische Maßnahmen (von 3,8±1,9 auf 2,5±1,8, p=0,004), strukturiertes Vorführen der einzelnen Untersuchungsschritte (von 2,9±1,5 auf 1,8±1, p=0,001), Üben der Untersuchungsschritte (von 3,1±1,8 auf 2,2±1,4, p=0,030), strukturiertes Feedback zur Untersuchungstechnik (von 3,0±1,4 auf 2,3±1,0, p0,=0,007), Verwenden von Handouts (von 5,2±1,4 auf 1,8±1,4, p<0,001), Tipps zu weiterem Lernmaterial (von 5,0±1,4 auf 3,4±2,0, p<0,001), Lernerfahrung insgesamt (von 2,4±0,9 auf 1,9±0,8, p=0,017) und Selbsteinschätzung der Studenten bezüglich der Sicherheit bei der Durchführung einer körperlichen Untersuchung (von 3,5±1,3 auf 2,5±1,1, p<0,001).Zusammenfassung: Strukturierte Verbesserungsmaßnahmen führten zu signifikanten Verbesserungen der Evaluationsnoten eines klinischen Untersuchungskurstages in den Bereichen "Vorbereitung der Dozenten", "Struktur des Kurses" und "selbst eingeschätzte Sicherheit beim Durchführen einer Untersuchung"

Improved self- and external assessment of the clinical abilities of medical students through structured improvement measures in an internal medicine bedside course

Background: Bedside courses are of outstanding importance when training medical students. The fact that less and less teaching is taking place nowadays at the patient's bedside makes it all the more important that the available time be put to effective use. The aim of this study was to check whether structured improvement measures in the course (scripts, lecturer briefing, e-learning cases) would improve the abilities of the students on the basis of a subjective self-assessment as well as an external assessment by the lecturers with respect to clinical abilities. Methods: Bedside teaching takes place in the fourth study year in the Medical Clinics of the TU Munich. Both students and lecturers had the chance to hand in an anonymous, quantitative self- and external assessment of the clinical abilities of the students (German grading system) after every course date. This assessment took place online in the three categories "Medical history & examination", "Diagnosis" and "Therapy". An overall period of four semesters, each with 6 course dates, was investigated. After two of the total of four semesters in the study, the course was changed by introducing scripts, lecturer briefing as well as interactive e-learning cases. The self- and external assessment was compared both within the semester (date 1-3: A; date 4-6: B), during the course as well as before and after introducing the improvement measures ("before" (T0): SS 2012, SS 2013, "after" (T1): WS 2013/2014, SS 2014).Results: There was a significant improvement in one's own abilities on the basis of the self-assessment within each semester when comparing the first (A) and the last (B) course dates. Moreover, there was a significant improvement in the performances in all three categories when T0 was compared with T1, from both the point of view of the students ("Medical history & examination": T0 =2.5±0.9, T1=2.2±0.7, pp<0.001; "Diagnosis" T0=3.1±1.0, T1=2.8 ±0.9, pp<0.001; "Therapy": T0=3.8±1.3, T1=3.5±1.2, pp<0.018) and in two of the three categories from the point of view of the lecturers ("Diagnosis": T0=3.0±1.0, T1=2.7±0.7, p.=0.028; "Therapy": T0=3.8±1.1, T1=3.1±1.0, p<0.001). Summary: The structured measures to improve the course including the interactive e-learning cases could have contributed to improved practical abilities with respect to the medical history and examination techniques as well as diagnostic and therapeutic thinking. The external evaluation by lecturers confirmed the improvement with respect to the diagnostic and therapeutic abilities. They only saw no dynamic change in the student's taking histories and clinical examinations

Colorectal neoplastic emergencies in immunocompromised patients: preliminary result from the Web-based International Register of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (WIRES-T trial)

Association of advanced age, neoplastic disease and immunocompromission (IC) may lead to surgical emergencies. Few data exist about this topic. Present study reports the preliminary data from the WIRES-T trial about patients managed for colorectal neoplastic emergencies in immunocompromised patients. The required data were taken from a prospective observational international register. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee with approval n. 17575; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03643718. 839 patients were collected; 753 (80.7%) with mild–moderate IC and 86 (10.3%) with severe. Median age was 71.9&nbsp;years and 73&nbsp;years, respectively, in the two groups. The causes of mild–moderate IC were reported such malignancy (753–100%), diabetes (103–13.7%), malnutrition (26–3.5%) and uremia (1–0.1%), while severe IC causes were steroids treatment (14–16.3%); neutropenia (7–8.1%), malignancy on chemotherapy (71–82.6%). Preoperative risk classification were reported as follow: mild–moderate: ASA 1–14 (1.9%); ASA 2–202 (26.8%); ASA 3–341 (45.3%); ASA 4–84 (11.2%); ASA 5–7 (0.9%); severe group: ASA 1-1 patient (1.2%); ASA 2–16 patients (18.6%); ASA 3–41 patients (47.7%); ASA 4–19 patients (22.1%); ASA 5–3 patients (3.5%); lastly, ASA score was unavailable for 105 cases (13.9%) in mild–moderate group and in 6 cases (6.9%) in severe group. All the patients enrolled underwent urgent/emergency surgery Damage control approach with open abdomen was adopted in 18 patients. Mortality was 5.1% and 12.8%, respectively, in mild–moderate and severe groups. Long-term survival data: in mild–moderate disease-free survival (median, IQR) is 28 (10–91) and in severe IC, it is 21 (10–94). Overall survival (median, IQR) is 44 (18–99) and 26 (20–90) in mild–moderate and severe, respectively; the same is for post-progression survival (median, IQR) 29 (16–81) and 28, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed as the only factor influencing mortality in mild–moderate and severe IC is the ASA score. Colorectal neoplastic emergencies in immunocompromised patients are more frequent in elderly. Sigmoid and right colon are the most involved. Emergency surgery is at higher risk of complication and mortality; however, management in dedicated emergency surgery units is necessary to reduce disease burden and to optimize results by combining oncological and acute care principles. This approach may improve outcomes to obtain clinical advantages for patients like those observed in elective scenario. Lastly, damage control approach seems feasible and safe in selected patients