Nabelvenenkatheter- und periphere zentrale katheterassoziierte Komplikationen bei Frühgeborenen mit einem Geburtsgewicht < 1250 g : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Österreich und Deutschland

Background and objective Umbilical venous catheters (UVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are commonly used in preterm infants but have been associated with a number of serious complications. We performed a survey in Austria and Germany to assess the use of UVCs and PICCs in preterm infants with a birth weight < 1250 g and associated rates of catheter-related adverse events. Methods Electronic survey of participating centers of the NeoVitaA trial. Main outcome parameter was the reported rates of UVC- and PICC-associated complications (infection, thrombosis, emboli, organ injury, arrhythmia, dislocation, miscellaneous). Results In total, 20 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) providing maximal intensive care in Austria and Germany (level I) were contacted, with a senior neonatologist response rate of 12/20 (60%). The reported rates for UVC with a dwell time of 1–10 days were bacterial infection: 4.2 ± 3.4% (range 0–10%); thrombosis: 7.3 ± 7.1% (0–20%); emboli: 0.9 ± 2.0% (0–5%); organ injury: 1.1 ± 1.9% (0–5%); cardiac arrhythmia: 2.2 ± 2.5% (0–5%); and dislocation: 5.4 ± 8.7% (0–30%); and for PICCs with a dwell time of 1–14 days bacterial infection: 15.0 ± 3.4% (range 2.5–30%); thrombosis; 4.3 ± 3.5% (0–10%); emboli: 0.8 ± 1.6% (0–5%); organ injury: 1.5 ± 2.3% (0–5%); cardiac arrhythmia: 1.5 ± 2.3% (0–5%), and dislocation: 8.5 ± 4.6% (0–30%). Conclusion The catheter-related complication rates reported in this survey differed between UVCs and PICCs and were higher than those reported in the literature. To generate more reliable data on this clinically important issue, we plan to perform a large prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the non-inferiority of a prolonged UVC dwell time (up to 10 days) against the early change (up to 5 days) to a PICC.Hintergrund und Ziel Nabelvenenkatheter („umbilical venous catheters“ [UVC]) und periphere zentrale Venenkatheter (PICC) werden häufig bei Frühgeborenen eingesetzt, sind jedoch mit einer Reihe von schwerwiegenden Komplikationen verbunden. In Österreich und Deutschland wurde eine Umfrage durchgeführt, um die Verwendung von UVC und PICC bei Frühgeborenen mit einem Geburtsgewicht < 1250 g und die damit verbundenen Raten von katheterbedingten unerwünschten Ereignissen zu bewerten. Methoden Elektronische Befragung der teilnehmenden Zentren der NeoVitaA-Studie. Hauptergebnisparameter waren die gemeldeten Raten von UVC- und PICC-assoziierten Komplikationen (Infektion, Thrombose, Embolie, Organverletzung, Arrhythmie, Dislokation, Sonstiges). Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden 20 neonatale Intensivstationen (NICU) mit maximaler Intensivpflege in Österreich und Deutschland (Level I) kontaktiert, wobei 12/20 (60 %) von leitenden Neonatologen beantwortet wurden. Die gemeldeten Raten für UVC mit einer Verweildauer von 1 bis 10 Tagen waren bakterielle Infektionen: 4,2 ± 3,4 % (Bereich: 0–10 %); Thrombose: 7,3 ± 7,1 % (0–20 %); Embolie: 0,9 ± 2,0 % (0–5 %); Organverletzung: 1,1 ± 1,9 % (0–5 %); Herzrhythmusstörungen: 2,2 ± 2,5 % (0–5 %); und Dislokation: 5,4 ± 8,7% (0–30 %); und bei PICC mit einer Verweildauer von 1 bis 14 Tagen bakterielle Infektionen: 15,0 ± 3,4 % (Bereich: 2,5–30 %); Thrombose: 4,3 ± 3,5 % (0–10 %); Embolie: 0,8 ± 1,6 % (0–5 %); Organverletzung: 1,5 ± 2,3 % (0–5 %); Herzrhythmusstörungen: 1,5 ± 2,3 % (0–5 %) und Verrenkungen: 8,5 ± 4,6 % (0–30 %). Schlussfolgerung Die in dieser Umfrage berichteten katheterbedingten Komplikationsraten unterschieden sich zwischen UVC und PICC und waren höher als die in der Literatur berichteten. Um zuverlässigere Daten zu diesem klinisch wichtigen Thema zu erhalten, ist eine große prospektive, multizentrische, randomisierte, kontrollierte Studie geplant, in der die Nichtunterlegenheit einer verlängerten UVC-Verweildauer (bis zu 10 Tage) gegenüber dem frühen Wechsel (bis zu 5 Tage) zu einem PICC untersucht werden soll

Cognitive behavioural therapy in elderly type 2 diabetes patients with minor depression or mild major depression: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (MIND-DIA)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The global prevalence of diabetes among adults will be 6.4% in 2010 and will increase to 7.7% by 2030. Diabetes doubles the odds of depression, and 9% of patients with diabetes are affected by depressive disorders. When subclinical depression is included, the proportion of patients who have clinically relevant depressive symptoms increases to 26%. In patients aged over 65 years, the interaction of diabetes and depression has predicted increased mortality, complications, disability, and earlier occurrence of all of these adverse outcomes. These deleterious effects were observed even in minor depression, where the risk of mortality within 7 years was 4.9 times higher compared with diabetes patients who did not have depressive symptoms. In this paper we describe the design and methods of the Minor Depression and Diabetes trial, a clinical trial within the 'Competence Network for Diabetes mellitus', which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Patients' inclusion criteria are: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, 65 to 85 years of age, 3 to 6 depressive symptoms (minor depression or mild major depression). Our aim is to compare the efficacy of diabetes-specific cognitive behavioural therapy adapted for the elderly vs. intensified treatment as usual vs. a guided self-help intervention regarding improvement of health related quality of life as the primary outcome. The trial will be conducted as a multicentre, open, observer-blinded, parallel group (3 groups) randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to one of the three treatment conditions. After 12 weeks of open-label therapy in all treatment conditions, both group interventions will be reduced to one session per month during the one-year long-term phase of the trial. At the one-year follow-up, all groups will be re-examined regarding the primary and secondary parameters, for example reduction of depressive symptoms, prevention of moderate/severe major depression, improvement of glycaemic control, mortality, and cost effectiveness. Depending on additional funding, the sample will be continuously observed as a prospective cohort; the primary outcome will be changed to mortality for all subsequent follow-up measurements.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Current Controlled Trials Register (ISRCTN58007098).</p

Cone beetles of the genus Conophthorus in California (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Volume: 39Start Page: 43End Page: 5

Three new species of Thyanta Stal (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae)

Volume: 33Start Page: 175End Page: 18

Two new species of Brochymena (Pentatomidae, Heteroptera) from Arizona

Volume: 33Start Page: 236End Page: 24

A synopsis of the California deathwatch beetles of the genus Emobius Thomson, with descriptions of two new species which attack pine cones (Coleoptera: Anobiidae)

Volume: 33Start Page: 157End Page: 16